Association of Maternal and Umbilical Cord Blood Lipid Parameters with Uterine and Fetal-Placental Blood Flow in Hypertensive and Normotensive Pregnancies.

PURPOSE: There is a growing evidence suggesting that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), especially preeclampsia, are associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic disease for both mother and child later in life. The objective of this study was to determine the association of maternal and umbilical cord blood (UCB) lipid profiles with uterine and fetal-placental blood flow at the third trimester of pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,135 women were prospectively followed through pregnancy and data for 812 mother-newborn pairs, including 170 HDP ‎developed subjects and ‎642 ‎normotensive subjects were analyzed at the end of the study. Maternal serum and UCB triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and non-HDL-C levels were compared between HDP and normotensive groups; moreover, the association between lipid parameters and abnormal pulsatility indices (PIs) of uterine (UtA), umbilical (UA), and middle cerebral (MCA) arteries was evaluated with multivariate regression analysis models. The same analyses were carried out on subgroups of HDP (preeclampsia vs gestational hypertension).
RESULTS: The mean TG, TC, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C levels were significantly higher in mother-newborn pairs of the HDP group compared to the normotensive group. In the HDP group, maternal TG and non-HDL-C levels were shown to have a significant association with abnormal UtA-PI (p<0.001 and p=0.039, respectively). We also found a positive significant association of fetal hypertriglyceridemia with abnormal UA-PI and MCA-PI in the HDP group (p=0.042 and p=0.021, respectively). However, no such associations were observed in normotensive mother-newborn pairs. Similar trends were observed in preeclamptic subjects after subgroup analysis.
CONCLUSION: Maternal TG and non-HDL-C levels as well as fetal TG level are significantly associated with disturbed uterine and fetal-placental blood flow in HDP.

Introduction

Pregnancy is a unique period in life associated with metabolic changes in order to ensure an adequate supply of energy source including glucose, amino acids, and lipids, to the developing fetus. Maternal blood lipid concentrations increase progressively with advancing gestation, which is considered a physiological adaptation to normal pregnancy.1,2 However, exaggerated elevations in maternal blood cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels during pregnancy apparently are associated with preterm birth,3 gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM),3,4 hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP),4–7 macrosomia,4 and also an increased risk of atherosclerotic events later in life for both mothers and their babies.3,8

In a meta-analysis,9 it was demonstrated that maternal triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and non-HDL-C levels during pregnancy are significantly associated with the risk of preeclampsia, which is the main subtype of HDP. While, the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and preeclampsia was not conclusive.9 A growing number of studies suggest that dyslipidemia during pregnancy especially in those complicated with preeclampsia may play a role in endothelial dysfunction and the subsequent atherosclerosis formation.10,11 Therefore, we hypothesized that the latter process may be present upon diagnosing preeclampsia and there may be a pathophysiological link between abnormal lipid levels and disturbed uteroplacental blood flow during pregnancy. Accordingly, it was suggested that increased maternal blood TG and TC/HDL-C ratio could potentially worsen the uterine blood flow assessed by Doppler ultrasound in pregnancies complicated with GDM;12 however, there is no large-scale analysis of this association for patients with HDP.

Third-trimester Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis is a noninvasive and useful method for assessing fetal growth. Additionally, it has been used successfully for prediction of perinatal morbidity and mortality among high-risk pregnancies, such as those complicated with HDP.13,14 This method is clinically important because the impaired uterine and/or fetal placental blood perfusion caused by vascular dysfunction precedes clinical manifestations of HDP;15 therefore, this would provide enough time for clinicians to apply the most appropriate treatment options.

To date, there is no evidence of the association of maternal and umbilical cord blood (UCB) lipid parameters with uterine and fetal-placental blood flow, neither in hypertensive nor in normotensive pregnancies. In addition, most studies compare the lipid levels between normotensive and hypertensive women without considering the preconception lipid status of study subjects, which may lead to a false conclusion; for example, a proportion of patients may already have dyslipidemia and associated vascular dysfunction before conception, which is not attributable to the HDP.

The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) assessing the link between HDP-induced blood flow changes in the mother, revealed as changes in the uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), with maternal blood lipid levels; 2) assessing ‎the link between HDP-induced blood flow changes in the fetus, revealed as changes in the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries pulsatility indices (UA-PI and MCA-PI), with UCB lipid levels; 3) comparing and showing whether these relationships are significantly different between hypertensive and normotensive pregnancies; and 4) conducting a separate analysis regarding this association on subgroups of the HDP group (preeclampsia vs gestational hypertension).

Methods and Materials

Study Population

Pregnant women who had their prenatal care and delivery at Hafez and Hazrat Zeinab Hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences were prospectively recruited for the present study from January 2018 to August 2019. All participants provided the study with written informed consent. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (97-01-01-18902).

The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) maternal age of 20–35 years; 2) singleton pregnancies; 3) naturally fertilized; and 4) having complete medical records and a clear gestational age confirmed by the first trimester ultrasound. Exclusion criteria of the pregnant women were as follows: 1) women with chronic medical conditions that may affect the lipid profile such as pre-existing diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, thyroid diseases, renal diseases, autoimmune disorders etc.; 2) polycystic ovary syndrome; 3) preconception BMI≥ 30; 4) fetal/neonatal death; 5) non-fasting state at the time of maternal blood sampling (less than 8 hours); 6) intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR), which may occur simultaneously with HDP and negatively affects UA-PI and MCA-PI; 7) pregnancies with GDM were also excluded due to the possibility of increasing maternal lipid levels and disturbing uterine blood perfusion during pregnancy;12 and 8) delivery≤ 30 weeks of gestation. Also, mothers aged > 35 years were not included in the study because of their potential to have disturbed uterine blood flow possibly leading to bias.16

During the study period, 1,240 women were initially enrolled. We excluded 428 participants for the following reasons: pre-existing dyslipidemia at the first antenatal visit (n=63), pre-existing chronic diseases (n=42), fetal/neonatal death (n=15), IUGR and/or GDM (n=182), failing in follow-up or delivery at another healthcare facility (n=87), missing data on maternal or UCB lipid levels (n=39). Finally, 812 pairs of mothers and newborns remained for analysis in the current report (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Schematic presentation of the study cohort.

Data Collection and Measurements

All data about maternal age, body mass index (BMI), obstetrical history, gestational age (confirmed by the first trimester ultrasound), and lipid status of patients was collected at the first antenatal visit (ranging from 8 to 14 weeks of gestation). Women with previously known dyslipidemia were not included in the study. However, serum lipid profile was screened for women with unknown status of lipid profile before entry to the study cohort and individuals with abnormal lipid parameters according to new recommendations from the American Heart Association were considered ineligible for recruitment.17

The study population was followed from recruitment at the first antenatal visit to 28 days postpartum to ensure neonatal survival. Blood pressure measurement, urine dipstick test, weight gain measurement, and other routine examinations were performed at each antenatal visit. Women with blood pressure of ≥ 140/90 mm Hg, measured twice at least 6 hours apart, after 20 weeks of gestation were considered as the gestational hypertension group. Additionally, patients who met the above-mentioned criteria plus proteinuria ≥300 mg in 24 hour urine or ≥ 1+ using a urine dipstick were considered as the preeclampsia group. At the end of the study, participants were grouped into one of the following groups: HDP (n=170), including preeclampsia (n=80) and gestational hypertension (n=90), and normotensive uncomplicated pregnancies (n=642).

Maternal blood samples were taken after overnight fasting from all mothers at the third trimester of pregnancy (≥ 28 weeks of gestation). The study population was followed to the delivery and blood samples were taken from the umbilical cord immediately after delivery. The serum samples were separated by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes and then serum samples were stored at −70°C immediately after centrifugation until further analysis. Serum TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C was analyzed by the enzymatic colorimetric method (Pars Azmoon, Tehran, Iran) and non-HDL-C was calculated as TC (mg/dL) – HDL-C (mg/dL).

Doppler Ultrasound Examination

Doppler velocimetry was performed using a Voluson E8 Sonography machine (General Electronic Healthcare Technologies, Wisconsin, USA). All sonographic data collection was done within 28–34 weeks of gestation by an expert sonographer to eliminate inter-observer variability. In order to assess UtA-PI, the probe was placed on the lower quadrants of the abdomen and angled medially, then color Doppler imaging was employed to identify the UtA at the point where it crossed the external iliac artery. Right and left UtA-PI were measured twice with a 5-minute interval, and the mean of the four UtA-PI values (two values for each artery) was defined as mean UtA-PI. Doppler flow spectra of UA and MCA were obtained from the free loop portion of the umbilical cord and the distal portion of the MCA by methods that have been previously described.18 PI values above the 95th percentile standardized for the gestational age were set as abnormal for the UtA and UA,19,20 and below the 10th percentile for the MCA.20

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The data were expressed as the means (SD) or frequency (percentage), respectively. Differences between baseline characteristics of study groups were evaluated by Student’s t-test or chi-square test accordingly. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association between: 1) maternal blood lipid parameters and abnormal UtA-PI after adjustment for potentially confounding risk factors (Model-1: maternal age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, preconception BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, parity, and gestational age at the time of blood sampling); 2) UCB lipid parameters and abnormal UA-PI and MCA-PI after adjustment for potentially confounding risk factors (Model-2: all of the risk factors adjusted in Model-1 in addition to gender of fetus, gestational age at birth, anthropometric measurements of newborn at birth, and maternal blood lipid parameters). The lipid parameters that were significantly associated with the presence of abnormal PI were categorized into quartiles, and the association between the presence of abnormal PI and the different lipid quartiles, with the lowest quartile as reference, was analyzed. All statistical tests were two tailed, and p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Baseline Characteristics, Lipid Parameters, and Doppler Indices

Table 1 presents maternal and neonatal characteristics of our study cohort. Among the 812 eligible women in the present study, the mean (SD) maternal age and preconception BMI were 28.07 (4.97) years old and 23.05 (1.64) kg/m2, respectively. The rate of nulliparity was 49.8% in the study population. Nulliparity was more common among the HDP group than among the normotensive women (60% vs 47.04%, p=0.003). The mean (SD) gestational age of the HDP group at delivery was 37.14 (1.97) weeks, while in the normotensive group it was 38.66 (1.60) weeks (p<0.001). Consequently, first- and fifth-minute APGAR scores, birth weight, height, abdominal circumference, and head circumference in newborns of the HDP group were significantly lower than those in the normotensive group.

Table 1

Maternal and Neonatal Characteristics of Study Population

	All Subjects (N=812)	HDP (n=170)	Normotensive (n=642)	p-value*
Maternal Variables
Maternal age, years	28.07 (4.97)	27.86 (5.02)	28.13 (4.96)	0.530
Preconception BMI, kg/m2	23.05 (1.64)	23.04 (1.80)	23.05 (1.59)	0.936
BMI before delivery, kg/m2	27.85 (1.72)	27.93 (1.96)	27.82 (1.65)	0.488
Weight gain during pregnancy, kg	12.27 (1.29)	12.52 (1.34)	12.21 (1.28)	0.006
SBP, mmHg	129.06 (15.86)	149.83 (16.97)	123.55 (9.88)	<0.001
DBP, mmHg	77.83 (9.32)	87.14 (11.31)	75.36 (6.86)	<0.001
Parity:
Nulliparous	404 (49.8%)	102 (60%)	302 (47.04%)	0.003
Multiparous	408 (50.2%)	68 (40%)	340 (52.96%)
Cesarean section delivery	278 (34.2%)	99 (58.2%)	179 (27.9%)	<0.001
Neonatal Variables
Gestational age, weeks	38.34 (1.79)	37.14 (1.97)	38.66 (1.60)	<0.001
Gender (boy)	427 (52.59%)	94 (55.29%)	333 (51.87%)	0.426
First-minute APGAR	8.32 (1.23)	7.54 (1.43)	8.53 (1.09)	<0.001
Fifth-minute APGAR	9.31 (1.05)	8.76 (1.33)	9.45 (0.91)	<0.001
Weight, gr	2892.94 (288.30)	2831.92 (305.37)	2909.10 (281.64)	0.003
Height, cm	48.60 (2.80)	46.84 (3.22)	49.07 (2.48)	<0.001
Abdominal circumference, cm	31.62 (3.00)	29.98 (2.96)	32.05 (2.86)	<0.001
Head circumference, cm	34.20 (1.35)	33.64 (1.50)	34.34 (1.27)	<0.001

Notes: *P-values were derived from the comparisons between the HDP and normotensive groups.

Abbreviations: HDP, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 2 summarizes the Doppler findings, maternal, UCB lipid profiles, and their comparison between study groups. The mean UtA-PI and UA-PI was significantly higher in the HDP than normotensive group (p<0.001), whereas the mean MCA-PI was lower in pregnancies with HDP than normotensive pregnancies (p<0.001). We found that maternal and UCB levels of TG, TC, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C were significantly higher in the HDP group compared to the normotensive group. UCB level of HDL-C was significantly lower in the HDP group than in the normotensive group, while maternal HDL-C level was comparable between the study groups.

Table 2

Doppler Indices and Lipid Parameters of the Study Population

	All Subjects (N=812)	HDP (n=170)	Normotensive (n=642)	p-value*
	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)
Doppler Indices
UtA-PI	0.77 (0.17)	0.91 (0.17)	0.73 (0.15)	<0.001
UA-PI	0.77 (0.16)	0.92 (0.17)	0.73 (0.14)	<0.001
MCA-PI	1.73 (0.25)	1.61 (0.25)	1.77 (0.23)	<0.001
Maternal Lipid Parameters
TG, mg/dL	215.12(40.86)	236.15 (46.81)	209.55 (37.23)	<0.001
TC, mg/dL	224.80 (33.81)	240.14 (43.44)	220.74 (29.49)	<0.001
HDL-C, mg/dL	50.15 (7.22)	50.32 (8.69)	50.11 (6.78)	0.734
LDL-C, mg/dL	131.69 (29.94)	142.41 (36.73)	128.85(27.20)	<0.001
Non-HDL-C, mg/dL	174.97 (33.66)	190.17 (41.37)	170.95(30.07)	<0.001
UCB Lipid Parameters
TG, mg/dL	44.06 (14.04)	50.81 (19.93)	42.25 (11.35)	<0.001
TC, mg/dL	61.77 (11.39)	63.64 (12.90)	61.27 (10.90)	0.016
HDL-C, mg/dL	27.68 (5.73)	26.46 (6.60)	28.01 (5.43)	0.002
LDL-C, mg/dL	25.34 (9.27)	27.32 (9.54)	24.81 (9.13)	0.002
Non-HDL-C, mg/dL	34.09 (9.68)	37.18 (10.13)	33.26 (9.40)	<0.001

Notes: *P-values were derived from the comparisons between the HDP and normotensive groups.

Abbreviations: HDP, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; UtA-PI, uterine artery pulsatility index; UA-PI, umbilical artery pulsatility index; MCA-PI, middle cerebral artery pulsatility index; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Non-HDL-C, non high density lipoprotein cholesterol; UCB, umbilical cord blood.

Association of Abnormal Pulsatility Indices (PIs) of UtA, UA and MCA with Lipid Markers

After adjustment for potential confounding factors of Model 1 (as discussed above), maternal TG exhibits the strongest association with abnormal UtA-PI (p<0.001, AOR = 1.033, 95% CI: 1.020–1.045), followed by non-HDL level (p=0.039, AOR = 1.011, 95% CI: 1.001–1.021) in women with HDP, while no such association was observed in normotensive subjects (Table 3). Moreover, after adjustment for potential confounding factors of Model 2 (as discussed above), UCB TG showed a significant association with abnormal UA-PI (p=0.042, AOR = 1.028, 95% CI: 1.001–1.053) and MCA-PI (p=0.021, AOR = 1.021, 95% CI: 1.003–1.039) in the HDP group (Table 3).

Table 3

Adjusted Odd Ratios for Abnormal Doppler According to Lipid Parameters in the Study Population

	HDP (n=170)		Normotensive (n=642)
	OR (95% CI)	p-value	OR (95% CI)	p-value
Association between maternal lipid parameters and abnormal UtA-PIa
TG	1.033 (1.020–1.045)	<0.001*	1.007 (0.999–1.015)	0.072
TC	1.009 (0.999–1.019)	0.065	1.004 (0.993–1.014)	0.497
HDL-C	0.999 (0.957–1.044)	0.977	0.977 (0.934–1.022)	0.308
LDL-C	1.003 (0.993–1.014)	0.532	1.003 (0.991–1.014)	0.656
Non-HDL-C	1.011 (1.001–1.021)	0.039*	1.009 (0.999–1.018)	0.066
Association between UCB lipid parameters and abnormal UA-PIb
TG	1.028 (1.001–1.053)	0.042*	1.025 (0.934–1.125)	0.597
TC	1.031 (0.984–1.080)	0.196	1.024 (0.890–1.177)	0.744
HDL-C	0.987 (0.914–1.065)	0.735	1.175 (0.888–1.555)	0.258
LDL-C	1.024 (0.967–1.083)	0.420	0.968 (0.839–1.117)	0.659
Non-HDL-C	1.053 (0.996–1.112)	0.067	0.975 (0.846–1.124)	0.728
Association between UCB lipid parameters and abnormal MCA-PIb
TG	1.021 (1.003–1.039)	0.021*	1.015 (0.989–1.041)	0.275
TC	0.991 (0.945–1.039)	0.702	0.981(0.940–1.024)	0.377
HDL-C	0.960 (0.878–1.050)	0.377	1.038 (0.946–1.139)	0.433
LDL-C	0.991 (0.930–1.057)	0.788	0.951 (0.897–1.008)	0.090
Non-HDL-C	1.004 (0.944–1.067)	0.903	0.963 (0.917–1.011)	0.127

Notes: *Statistically significant. aModel 1 adjusted for maternal age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, preconception BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, parity, and gestational age at the time of blood sampling. bModel 2 adjusted for all the risk factors adjusted in Model 1 in addition to gender of fetus, anthropometric measurements of newborn at birth, and maternal blood lipid parameters.

Abbreviations: HDP, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; UtA-PI, uterine artery pulsatility index; UA-PI, umbilical artery pulsatility index; MCA-PI, middle cerebral artery pulsatility index; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Non-HDL-C, non high density lipoprotein cholesterol; UCB, umbilical cord blood.

Association of Abnormal Pulsatility Indices of UtA, UA and MCA with Lipid Quartiles

The lipid parameters that showed significant association with abnormal PI in the HDP group (maternal TG, non-HDL-C, and UCB TG) were categorized into quartiles and the association between each quartile and the presence of abnormal PI was evaluated, with the lowest quartile as reference (Figure 2). Compared to the lowest TG and non-HDL-C quartiles, subjects with the highest TG and non-HDL-C quartiles had significantly higher adjusted odds ratios (AOR) (AOR= 2.688 and AOR= 3.411, respectively) for abnormal UtA-PI after adjusting for confounding factors in Model 1 (Figure 2A and B). The third and fourth quartiles of UCB TG were associated with a higher risk of abnormal UA-PI compared to the lowest quartile (AOR= 3.071 and AOR= 3.256, respectively). In the meanwhile, study subjects with UCB TG in the fourth quartile had significantly increased risk of abnormal MCA-PI (AOR = 4.115, p=0.014) (Figure 2C and D). Consequently, there was a dose-response association between maternal TG, non-HDL-C and UCB TG and odds ratio of abnormal uterine or fetal-placental blood flow.

Figure 2

(A) Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for abnormal UtA-PI across quartiles of maternal TG. (B) Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for abnormal UtA-PI across quartiles of maternal non-HDL-c. (C) Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for abnormal UA-PI across quartiles of UCB-TG. (D) Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for abnormal MCA-PI across quartiles of UCB-TG. *Statistically significant.

Abbreviations: UtA-PI, uterine artery pulsatility index; UA-PI, umbilical artery pulsatility index; MCA-PI, middle cerebral artery pulsatility index; TG, triglycerides; non-HDL, non-high-density lipoprotein.

Separate Analysis on Subgroups of HDP (Preeclampsia and Gestational Hypertension)

We conducted a separate analysis on the study subjects with HDP to find out whether there is a similar association between lipid levels and abnormal blood flow in preeclampsia (n=80) and/or gestational hypertension (n=90) subgroups. In preeclamptic patients, maternal TG, non-HDL-C, and UCB TG levels remained significantly associated with abnormal UtA-PI and UA-PI, respectively (Table 4). In addition to TG and non-HDL-C, maternal TC was shown to be significantly associated with abnormal UtA-PI in preeclampsia (AOR=1.015, p=0.034), while in patients with gestational hypertension only maternal TG level was significantly associated with abnormal UtA-PI and no association was observed between lipid parameters and abnormal UA-PI or MCA-PI (Table 4).

Table 4

Adjusted Odd Ratios for Abnormal Doppler According to Lipid Parameters in Hypertensive Subgroups

	Preeclampsia (n=80)		Gestational Hypertension (n=90)
	OR (95% CI)	p-value	OR (95% CI)	p-value
Association between maternal lipid parameters and abnormal UtA-PIa
TG	1.032 (1.015–1.049)	<0.001*	1.035 (1.013–1.058)	0.002*
TC	1.015 (1.001–1.029)	0.034*	0.997 (0.981–1.013)	0.674
HDL-C	1.027 (0.969–1.089)	0.372	0.929 (0.852–1.012)	0.092
LDL-C	1.010 (0.994–1.025)	0.214	0.988 (0.969–1.008)	0.248
Non-HDL-C	1.016 (1.001–1.032)	0.031*	0.999 (0.983–1.016)	0.936
Association between UCB lipid parameters and abnormal UA-PIb
TG	1.084 (1.010–1.164)	0.026*	1.019 (0.980–1.059)	0.346
TC	1.022 (0.952–1.098)	0.544	1.230 (0.988–1.531)	0.064
HDL-C	0.984 (0.883–1.097)	0.775	1.105 (0.887–1.377)	0.374
LDL-C	1.009 (0.923–1.104)	0.842	1.081 (0.936–1.249)	0.290
Non-HDL-C	1.040 (0.956–1.131)	0.359	1.178 (0.991–1.399)	0.063
Association between UCB lipid parameters and abnormal MCA-PIb
TG	1.062 (0.956–1.180)	0.266	0.998 (0.916–1.087)	0.964
TC	1.008 (0.906–1.122)	0.879	0.932 (0.850–1.022)	0.137
HDL-C	0.976 (0.849–1.122)	0.735	0.900 (0.743–1.090)	0.281
LDL-C	1.014 (0.893–1.151)	0.832	0.914 (0.807–1.034)	0.153
Non-HDL-C	1.029 (0.911–1.161)	0.650	0.918 (0.814–1.035)	0.162

Notes: *Statistically significant. aModel 1 adjusted for maternal age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, preconception BMI, weight gain during pregnancy, parity, and gestational age at the time of blood sampling. bModel 2 adjusted for all of the risk factors adjusted in Model 1 in addition to gender of fetus, anthropometric measurements of newborn at birth, and maternal blood lipid parameters.

Abbreviations: UtA-PI, uterine artery pulsatility index; UA-PI, umbilical artery pulsatility index; MCA-PI, middle cerebral artery pulsatility index; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Non-HDL-C, non high density lipoprotein cholesterol; UCB, umbilical cord blood.

Discussion

This is the first study to assess lipid risk factors for disturbed uteroplacental blood flow in a pregnant cohort that included both hypertensive and normotensive participants. We noted that maternal serum TG and non-HDL-C concentrations in late pregnancy were independently and positively associated with the risk of disturbed UtA blood flow. Accordingly, there was a dose-response relationship between quartiles of maternal TG and non-HDL-C and the presence of an abnormal UtA-PI, further reinforcing the strength of these findings. Additionally, an increased UA-PI was correlated with fetal hypertriglyceridemia in the HDP group. The association patterns for these lipid parameters and Doppler indices showed a similar trend when preeclamptic subjects (vs gestational hypertension) were analyzed separately, suggesting that preeclampsia-related metabolic changes may play a significant role in deteriorating uteroplacental blood flow.

Although there is a great inconsistency and even contradictory results in the literature about lipid markers in preeclampsia, a recent meta-analysis showed that elevated TC, non-HDL-C, and TG levels are associated with preeclampsia,9 which is partly in line with the findings of the present study. Now, it is well elucidated that preeclampsia is associated with metabolic aberrations; however, scholars suggest that further investigations are needed to understand the role of dyslipidemia in the pathogenesis of this disease.9

The associations found between maternal blood lipid parameters (TG and non-HDL-C) and elevated UtA-PI suggest that a markedly high level of TG may potentially cause deterioration of the uteroplacental blood flow, especially in the case of preeclampsia. The high serum TG level, as an important cardiovascular risk marker, has been proposed to be independently associated with endothelial dysfunction in preeclamptic women.10,21 Along with hypertriglyceridemia, oxidative stress is also considered another process associated with endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia.10,22 Furthermore, a prospective study including 19 women with mild and 15 women with severe preeclampsia showed that severe preeclampsia is associated with oxidative stress, which may impair the placental perfusion measured by the increase of UtA resistance.22

According to recent findings, LDL-C is not the only form of cholesterol linked with adverse events. Studies have shown that atherogenic lipoproteins, referred to as non-HDL have a better predictive value for cardiovascular events than LDL-C levels only.23,24 Interestingly, a significant correlation was found between disturbed uterine perfusion and increased non-HDL-C levels in the current study. This finding could show the “atherogenic” role of non-HDL-C. This pro-atherogenic state in preeclampsia could lead to lipid deposition in the walls of the UtA extending to the spiral arteries. These vascular lesions resemble early stages of atherosclerosis and are thought to play a critical role in pathological vascular remodeling,25 leading to an increased UtA-PI and the subsequent adverse outcomes due to uteroplacental insufficiency.26

In a study by Bugatto et al,12 it was observed that maternal serum TG, HDL, and TC/HDL ratio were significantly associated with disturbed uterine blood flow in pregnancies complicated with GDM, but no association was seen in the control group. However, no study has so far investigated the association between lipid markers and uteroplacental flow in HDP.

Preceding studies have emphasized that vascular and hemodynamic function could be partially programmed during fetal life and that this background could be significantly involved in the arterial stiffening, and process of vascular remodeling in later life.27,28 Consequently, evaluating fetal vessels indirectly through Doppler strategies might be an advantageous technique to detect abnormal blood flow since vascular wall cells undergo metabolic and hormonal changes during the fetal life period.29

Despite several studies evaluating lipid parameters in maternal serum and its association with adverse outcomes, little is known about fetal lipid parameters and their role in different types of pathologies.30,31 Rodie et al30 reported a significant increase in levels of TG, TC, and TC/HDL-C ratio in UCB of fetuses of preeclamptic women, but Ophir et al31 did not find such an association and they only observed a slight increase of LDL-C in UCB of preeclamptic pregnancies. Among lipid parameters measured in newborns of our study population, elevated UCB TG concentration was shown to be associated with abnormal UA-PI and MCA-PI in the HDP group. This association pattern showed a similar trend when newborns of preeclamptic women were analyzed separately. Currently, a theoretical explanation provided by Romanowicz et al32 suggested that cholesterol accumulation in the umbilical artery wall may be responsible for the “early aging” of the umbilical cord tissue and consequently trigger the development of hypertension; however, the potential mechanisms still deserve further exploration.

Overall, our study results suggest that HDP is a pro-atherogenic state, which is mainly attributable to preeclampsia, and elevated lipid levels may play a significant role in disturbing maternal-fetal circulation. In addition, further research should be conducted to study the mechanisms of action of lipids in maternal-fetal blood circulation in depth.

Although this study is the first of its kind to analyze the association between lipid profiles of mother-newborn pairs and uterine and fetal placental blood flow, there are also limitations that should be highlighted: 1) we were not able to adjust for serum markers of inflammation and oxidative stress and these two factors could have confounded our results by affecting uterine blood flow especially in the case of preeclampsia; 2) although all maternal blood samples were collected in the fasting state, a few UCB samples were collected in non-fasting conditions due to emergency cesarean section; and 3) only a small number of patients developed preeclampsia (n=80) or gestational hypertension (n=90).

Conclusion

In summary, our study supports the association of maternal TG and non-HDL-C with abnormal uterine blood flow waveforms in women with HDP. Additionally, we found that fetal hypertriglyceridemia was the only fetal lipid abnormality associated with disturbed blood flow in UA and MCA. We suggest that affected mothers and their children could be targeted for programs aimed at reducing severe clinical cardiovascular diseases, by lifestyle or pharmacological interventions.