Literature DB >> 32184282

Frequency of repeat antinuclear antibody testing in Ontario: a population-based descriptive study.

Shirley Lake1, Zhan Yao2, Natasha Gakhal2, Amanda Steiman2, Gillian Hawker2, Jessica Widdifield2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Repeat antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing may be unnecessary, potentially harmful and costly. Our aim was to assess the frequency and correlates of repeat ANA testing in Ontario.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective descriptive study identifying ANA tests performed over 2008-2015 among adults within the Ontario Laboratories Information System. Our primary outcome was any ANA test performed within 1 year of a previous ANA test. Our secondary outcome was any repeat test after a previous positive result. Repeat testing overall (regardless of who performed the previous test) and repeat testing by the same provider who performed the previous test were determined separately. We assessed correlates of repeat testing (e.g., patient and physician characteristics) and of repeat testing after a positive result using separate logistic regression models by means of generalized estimating equations to account for clustering of repeat testing within patients and within physician practices.
RESULTS: In total, 587 357 ANA tests were performed in 437 966 patients over the study period, of which 126 322 (21.5%) gave a positive result and 164 913 (28.1%) were repeat tests. Family physicians ordered 358 422 tests (61.0%), and rheumatologists ordered 65 071 tests (11.1%). Of the repeat tests, 82 332 (49.9%) were ordered within 12 months of the previous test. Among the 73 961 repeat tests ordered by the same practitioner within 12 months, the previous test result was positive for 22 657 (30.6%). A higher proportion of rheumatologists than other physicians ordered repeat tests within 12 months (36.1% v. 11.3%). The most significant correlate of potentially redundant testing was testing among patients with suspected or confirmed connective tissue disease.
INTERPRETATION: Over a quarter of ANA tests in Ontario were repeat tests; rheumatologists were most likely to order repeat testing. Our findings may be useful to inform quality-improvement initiatives related to the appropriateness of ANA testing. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32184282      PMCID: PMC7082105          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  30 in total

1.  Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunologic tests: antinuclear antibody testing.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Arthur J Kavanaugh; Peter H Schur
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-08

2.  Choosing wisely: the Canadian Rheumatology Association's list of 5 items physicians and patients should question.

Authors:  Shirley L Chow; J Carter Thorne; Mary J Bell; Robert Ferrari; Zarnaz Bagheri; Tristan Boyd; Ann Marie Colwill; Michelle Jung; Damian Frackowiak; Glen S Hazlewood; Bindee Kuriya; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results.

Authors:  D W Bates; L Goldman; T H Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Testing 1, 2, 3: is overtesting undermining patient and system health?

Authors:  Margaret J McGregor; Danielle Martin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. American College of Pathologists.

Authors:  A Kavanaugh; R Tomar; J Reveille; D H Solomon; H A Homburger
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 6.  Diagnostic testing and interpretation of tests for autoimmunity.

Authors:  Christine Castro; Mark Gourley
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Diagnosing senescence: contributions to physician expenditure increases in british columbia, 1996/97 to 2005/06.

Authors:  Kimberlyn M McGrail; Robert G Evans; Morris L Barer; Kerry J Kerluke; Rachael McKendry
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-08

8.  Inappropriate use of commercial Antinuclear Antibody Testing in a community-based US hospital: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Abdul S Mohammed; Prajwal Boddu; David Mael; Mohammed Samee; Dana Villines
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2016-09-07

9.  Designation, diligence and drift: understanding laboratory expenditure increases in British Columbia, 1996/97 to 2005/06.

Authors:  Saskia N Sivananthan; Sandra Peterson; Ruth Lavergne; Morris L Barer; Kimberlyn M McGrail
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  The landscape of inappropriate laboratory testing: a 15-year meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming Zhi; Eric L Ding; Jesse Theisen-Toupal; Julia Whelan; Ramy Arnaout
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Janet E Squires; Danielle Cho-Young; Laura D Aloisio; Robert Bell; Stephen Bornstein; Susan E Brien; Simon Decary; Melissa Demery Varin; Mark Dobrow; Carole A Estabrooks; Ian D Graham; Megan Greenough; Doris Grinspun; Michael Hillmer; Tanya Horsley; Jiale Hu; Alan Katz; Christina Krause; John Lavis; Wendy Levinson; Adrian Levy; Michelina Mancuso; Steve Morgan; Letitia Nadalin-Penno; Andrew Neuner; Tamara Rader; Wilmer J Santos; Gary Teare; Joshua Tepper; Amanda Vandyk; Michael Wilson; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 16.859

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.