Literature DB >> 32184210

Occupational lifting and adverse pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Agathe Croteau1.   

Abstract

This systematic review was conducted to help clarify the effect of lifting at work on pregnancy outcome, by focusing on specific exposure categories. A search in Medline and Embase identified 51 articles reporting association of spontaneous abortion (SA), preterm delivery (PTD) or small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infant with exposure to occupational lifting. A global validity score was assigned to each study and six potential sources of bias were considered in sensitivity analyses. For each exposure-outcome combination, a summary risk estimate (RE) was obtained from all studies and from a subset of studies with high validity score, this latter summary RE was selected as a final result. Statistical heterogeneity was measured with I2 and Q tests and the possibility of a publication bias was also assessed. For each meta-analysis, the strength of evidence was established from explicit criteria. Heavy (or ≥10 kg) loads often (or ≥10x/day) lifted were associated with increased risks of SA (summary RE=1.31, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.47) and PTD (summary RE=1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.43), with good strength of evidence. No association was identified with SGA, nor with lower exposure levels and SA or PTD. These results are reassuring for lower levels of exposure; however, observed associations can guide health professionals' recommendations aimed at the prevention of SA and PTD for pregnant women who frequently lift (or ≥10x/day) heavy (or ≥10 kg) loads at work.Résumé. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  female reproductive effects and adverse pregnancy outcomes; meta-analysis; occupational health practice; physical work; workload

Year:  2020        PMID: 32184210     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  4 in total

1.  Working conditions in low risk nulliparous women in The Netherlands: are legislation and guidelines a guarantee for a healthy working environment? A cohort study.

Authors:  Monique D M van Beukering; Heleen J Schuster; Myrthe J C S Peelen; Marit E A Schonewille; Petra J Hajenius; Ruben G Duijnhoven; Teus Brand; Rebecca C Painter; Marjolein Kok
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.851

2.  Ergonomic demands and fetal loss in women in welding and electrical trades: A Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  Nicola Cherry; Jeremy Beach; Jean-Michel Galarneau
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.079

3.  Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women.

Authors:  Xin Hui Choo; Chee Wai Ku; See Ling Loy; Jerry Kok Yen Chan; Yin Bun Cheung; Keith M Godfrey; Yap-Seng Chong; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Kok Hian Tan; Thiam Chye Tan; Sadhana Nadarajah; Fabian Kok Peng Yap; Marjorelee T Colega; Mary Foong-Fong Chong; Shiao-Yng Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluation of a blended care programme for caregivers and working pregnant women to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes: an intervention study.

Authors:  Monique van Beukering; Adeline Velu; Lydia Henrike Nicole Schonewille; Ruben Duijnhoven; Ben Willem Mol; Teus Brand; Monique Frings-Dresen; Marjolein Kok
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.