Literature DB >> 32184153

Clinical duration of action of different botulinum toxin types in humans.

Roberto Eleopra1, Sara Rinaldo2, Cesare Montecucco3, Ornella Rossetto4, Grazia Devigili5.   

Abstract

The Botulinum NeuroToxin (BoNT) comprises several serotypes with distinct properties, mechanisms of action, sensitivity and duration of effect in different species. The serotype A (BoNT/A) is the prevalent neurotoxin applied in human's disease. In this paper we present an overview of the current knowledge regarding the duration of effect and the neuromuscular sprouting of different BoNT serotypes in humans. Then, we report the original results of a study in healthy subjects treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F using different neurophysiological techniques. Twelve healthy volunteers (7 men, 5 women) are treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F or placebo in Abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle of the hand. Before and after injections, an extensive neurophysiological study is performed with the CMAP amplitude variation, Multi-Motor Unit Action Potentials (MUAPs) analysis, the Turns/Amplitude ratio of interference pattern (IP) and determination of jitter and Fiber Density (FD) at single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG), at week 2 (w2), 4 (w4), 6 (w6) and 8 (w8). A maximal neuromuscular block is obtained at w2 for all the serotypes. Afterwards, the CMAP trend appear similar for BoNT/A, B, and C while, BoNT/F shows a faster recover. Multi-MUAPs analysis and IP detect mild changes at w2 for all serotypes, except for BoNT/F that shows a greater change since w4. SFEMG have minimal changes in FD while, Jitter increase at w2 with a slower decrease over the time for all BoNTs. In conclusion, BoNT/F has earlier sprouting and complete recovery at w8. Other serotypes present a slower and similar profile. The EMG appear useful to study the functional recovery in humans, and these results should provide new evidence for assessing different serotypes. These findings improve our knowledge regarding the methods to evaluate duration of effects and dose equivalents in different serotypes, that in the future could change the clinicians strategy for disease-tailored BoNT therapies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Botulinum neurotoxins; Botulinum toxins serotypes; EDB test; MUAPs analysis; cMAP test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32184153     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  10 in total

Review 1.  Lacrimal gland botulinum toxin injection for epiphora management.

Authors:  Johnathan Jeffers; Katherine Lucarelli; Sruti Akella; Pete Setabutr; Ted H Wojno; Vinay Aakalu
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2021-08-15

Review 2.  Engineering Botulinum Neurotoxins for Enhanced Therapeutic Applications and Vaccine Development.

Authors:  Christine Rasetti-Escargueil; Michel R Popoff
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  Temporary Botulinum Immobilization of Residuum Muscles for Facilitation of the Initial Ingrowth of Skin to the Porous Skin and Bone Integrated Pylon in the Technology of Direct Skeletal Attachment: Large Animal Model.

Authors:  Zachary Bohart; Charles Cassidy; David Merrill; Mario Villani; Rosanna Villani; Leo Cappabianca; Mark Pitkin
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 4.  Contribution of Single-Fiber Evaluation on Monitoring Outcomes Following Injection of Botulinum Toxin-A: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hélène Moron; Corine Gagnard-Landra; David Guiraud; Arnaud Dupeyron
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Jitter Evaluation in Distant and Adjacent Muscles after Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Injection in 78 Cases.

Authors:  Joao Aris Kouyoumdjian; Carla Renata Graça; Fabio Nazare Oliveira
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  New Modified Recombinant Botulinum Neurotoxin Type F with Enhanced Potency.

Authors:  David Burgin; Cindy Périer; Gavin Hackett; Mark Elliott; Daniel Kwan; Fraser Hornby; Imran Mir; Jacquie Maignel; Sai Man Liu; Matthew Beard
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Structural Analysis of Botulinum Neurotoxins Type B and E by Cryo-EM.

Authors:  Sara Košenina; Markel Martínez-Carranza; Jonathan R Davies; Geoffrey Masuyer; Pål Stenmark
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 8.  Botulinum toxin in cancer therapy-current perspectives and limitations.

Authors:  Tomasz Grenda; Anna Grenda; Paweł Krawczyk; Krzysztof Kwiatek
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Botulinum Toxin for Essential Tremor and Hands Tremor in the Neurological Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yen-Hui Liao; Chien-Tai Hong; Tsai-Wei Huang
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Time to onset and duration of botulinum toxin efficacy in movement disorders.

Authors:  Claudia Ledda; Carlo Alberto Artusi; Leonardo Lopiano; Maurizio Zibetti; Antonella Tribolo; Domiziana Rinaldi; Gabriele Imbalzano
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.682

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.