Literature DB >> 32184100

Dissociable effects of tDCS polarity on latent decision processes are associated with individual differences in neurochemical concentrations and cortical morphology.

Hannah L Filmer1, Timothy Ballard2, Shane E Ehrhardt2, Saskia Bollmann3, Thomas B Shaw3, Jason B Mattingley4, Paul E Dux2.   

Abstract

Applying a weak electrical current to the cortex has the potential to modulate neural functioning and behaviour. The most common stimulation technique, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been used for causal investigations of brain and cognitive functioning, and to treat psychiatric conditions such as depression. However, the efficacy of tDCS in modulating behaviour varies across individuals. Moreover, despite being associated with different neural effects, the two polarities of electrical stimulation - anodal and cathodal - can result in similar behavioural outcomes. Here we employed a previously replicated behavioural paradigm that has been associated with polarity non-specific disruption of training effects in a simple decision-making task. We then used the linear ballistic accumulator model to quantify latent components of the decision-making task. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging measures were acquired prior to tDCS sessions to quantify cortical morphology and local neurochemical concentrations. Both anodal and cathodal stimulation disrupted learning-related task improvement relative to sham (placebo) stimulation, but the two polarities of stimulation had distinct effects on latent task components. Whereas anodal stimulation tended to affect decision thresholds for the behavioural task, cathodal stimulation altered evidence accumulation rates. Moreover, performance variability with anodal stimulation was related to cortical thickness of the inferior frontal gyrus, whereas performance variability with cathodal stimulation was related to cortical thickness in the inferior precentral sulcus, as well as to prefrontal neurochemical excitability. Our findings demonstrate that both cortical morphology and local neurochemical balance are important determinants of individual differences in behavioural responses to electrical brain stimulation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modelling; Cortical structure; Individual differences; Neurochemicals; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32184100     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  4 in total

1.  Reconciling psychological and neuroscientific accounts of reduced motivation in aging.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Alexandra Bagaïni; Todd A Hare; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Intervention is a better predictor of tDCS mind-wandering effects than subjective beliefs about experimental results.

Authors:  Matilda S Gordon; Jennifer X W Seeto; Paul E Dux; Hannah L Filmer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Applications of open-source software ROAST in clinical studies: A review.

Authors:  Mohigul Nasimova; Yu Huang
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 9.184

4.  Functional Effects of Bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulation During Sequential Decision-Making: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study With Offline Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Iryna Schommartz; Annika Dix; Susanne Passow; Shu-Chen Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.