| Literature DB >> 32183587 |
Yanyan Jing1, Fang Li1, Yameng Li1, Peng Jin1, Shengnan Zhu1, Chao He1, Junhui Zhao1, Zhiping Zhang1, Quanguo Zhang1.
Abstract
Corn stovers are rich in carbohydrates and can be used by anaerobic bacteria to produce hydrogen by fermentation. In the present study, using hydrogen production as the main experimental index, the effect of different influential factors on hydrogen production from corn stover saccharification and fermentation was studied, using the response surface method BBD model. The significance of interactions between different influential factors on hydrogen production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of corn stover material were investigated and optimized. Results showed that there were several factors affecting simultaneous saccharification fermentative hydrogen production from corn stover, including substrate concentration, inoculation amount, pH value and enzyme concentration. In linear terms, substrate concentration had the greatest influence on hydrogen production by anaerobic simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. In terms of multi-factor interactions, the interaction between pH and enzyme concentration was the most significant. The optimal hydrogen production conditions established from the BBD model were as follows: substrate concentration of 25 mg/mL, inoculation amount proportion of 32.62%, initial pH value of 6.50 and enzyme concentration of 172.08 mg/g, resulting in the maximum hydrogen production of 55.29 mL/g TS. The actual maximum hydrogen production reached 56.66 mL/g TS, with these experimental results consistent with the predicted value established from equation fitting. This study provides a reference for hydrogen production by anaerobic synchronous saccharification fermentation using corn stover as substrate and lays a foundation and provides technical support for the industrialization of biological hydrogen production using corn stover as substrate.Entities:
Keywords: Corn stover; biological hydrogen production; dark fermentation bacteria; response surface method
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32183587 PMCID: PMC7161564 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1739405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Composition of the corn straw raw material.
| Cellulose/% | Hemicellulose/% | Lignin/% | Moisure content/% | C/% | N/% | O/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.12 | 30.95 | 10.73 | 4.35 | 63.54 | 2.40 | 30.78 |
Variables of the response surface.
| Code | Variables | Unit | Low level (−1) | High level (+1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substrate concentration | mg/ml | 5 | 25 | |
| Inoculation amount | %(v/v) | 20 | 40 | |
| Initial pH | 6 | 7 | ||
| Enzyme concentration | mg/g | 100 | 200 |
Box-Behnken experimental design using four independent variables.
| Substrate concentration | Inoculation (%) | Initial pH | Enzyme concentrations (mg/g) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | Code | Code | Code | Code | Hydrogen Yield (mL/g TS) | ||||
| 1 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 6.0 − 1 | 100 | −1 | 51 | |
| 2 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 6.0 | −1 | 200 | +1 | 47 |
| 3 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 7.0 | +1 | 200 | +1 | 49 |
| 4 | 15 | 0 | 20 | −1 | 6.5 | 0 | 100 | −1 | 51 |
| 5 | 25 | +1 | 40 | +1 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 52 |
| 6 | 15 | 0 | 20 | −1 | 6.5 | 0 | 200 | +1 | 55 |
| 7 | 5 | −1 | 40 | +1 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 20 |
| 8 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 58 |
| 9 | 25 | +1 | 30 | 0 | 7.0 | +1 | 150 | 0 | 46 |
| 10 | 15 | 0 | 40 | +1 | 7.0 | +1 | 150 | 0 | 42 |
| 11 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 57 |
| 12 | 15 | 0 | 20 | −1 | 6.0 | −1 | 150 | 0 | 51 |
| 13 | 25 | +1 | 40 | +1 | 6.5 | 0 | 100 | −1 | 48 |
| 14 | 5 | −1 | 30 | 0 | 6.0 | −1 | 150 | 0 | 29 |
| 15 | 25 | +1 | 30 | 0 | 6.0 | −1 | 150 | 0 | 48 |
| 16 | 5 | −1 | 20 | −1 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 40 |
| 17 | 5 | −1 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 100 | −1 | 31 |
| 18 | 15 | 0 | 40 | +1 | 6.0 | −1 | 150 | 0 | 45 |
| 19 | 5 | −1 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 200 | +1 | 38 |
| 20 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 7.0 | +1 | 100 | −1 | 39 |
| 21 | 15 | 0 | 40 | +1 | 6.5 | 0 | 100 | +1 | 51 |
| 22 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 58 |
| 23 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 52 |
| 24 | 25 | +1 | 20 | −1 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 54 |
| 25 | 15 | 0 | 20 | −1 | 7.0 | +1 | 150 | 0 | 37 |
| 26 | 25 | +1 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 200 | +1 | 53 |
| 27 | 5 | −1 | 30 | 0 | 7.0 | +1 | 150 | 0 | 25 |
| 28 | 25 | +1 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 100 | −1 | 48 |
| 29 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 56 |
Figure 1.Three-dimensional surface plot and Contour plot for hydrogen yield. The response surface model was obtained by the BBD with the date shown in Table 3. (a) the effect of substrate concentration, inoculation amount and their mutual interaction on hydrogen yield; (b) the effect of substrate concentration, initial pH and their mutual interaction on hydrogen yield; (c) the effect of substrate concentration, enzyme concentration and their mutual interaction on 1hydrogen yield. (d) the effect of inoculation amount, initial pH and their mutual interaction on hydrogen yield. (e) the effect of inoculation amount, enzyme concentration and their mutual interaction on hydrogen yield. (f) the effect of initial pH, enzyme concentration and their mutual interaction on hydrogen yield.
Figure 1.(Contined).
ANOVA of the model.
| Sum of | Degree | Mean | F-value | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 2611.48 | 14 | 186.53 | 19.43 | < 0.0001 |
| 1140.75 | 1 | 1140.75 | 118.84 | < 0.0001 | |
| 75.00 | 1 | 75.00 | 7.81 | 0.0140 | |
| 90.75 | 1 | 90.75 | 9.45 | 0.0080 | |
| 48.00 | 1 | 48.00 | 5.00 | 0.0347 | |
| 81.00 | 1 | 81.00 | 8.44 | 0.0113 | |
| 1.00 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 0.7507 | |
| 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.026 | 0.7507 | |
| 30.25 | 1 | 30.25 | 3.15 | 0.0965 | |
| 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.026 | 0.8736 | |
| 49.00 | 1 | 49.00 | 5.10 | 0.0397 | |
| 823.38 | 1 | 823.38 | 85.78 | < 0.0001 | |
| 86.02 | 1 | 86.02 | 8.96 | 0.0101 | |
| 443.27 | 1 | 443.27 | 46.18 | < 0.0001 | |
| 17.48 | 1 | 17.48 | 1.82 | 0.1765 | |
| Residual | 134.38 | 14 | 9.60 | ||
| Lack of fit | 108.58 | 10 | 10.86 | 1.75 | 0.3101 |
| Pure error | 24.80 | 4 | 6.20 | ||
| Cor total | 2745.86 | 28 |
R-Squared= 0.9519 Adj R-Square=0.9039