Literature DB >> 32183509

Timepoint Selection Strategy for In Vivo Proteome Dynamics from Heavy Water Metabolic Labeling and LC-MS.

Vugar R Sadygov1, William Zhang2, Rovshan G Sadygov3.   

Abstract

Protein homeostasis, proteostasis, is essential for healthy cell functioning and is dysregulated in many diseases. Metabolic labeling with heavy water followed by liquid chromatography coupled online to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a powerful high-throughput technique to study proteome dynamics in vivo. Longer labeling duration and dense timepoint sampling (TPS) of tissues provide accurate proteome dynamics estimations. However, the experiments are expensive, and they require animal housing and care, as well as labeling with stable isotopes. Often, the animals are sacrificed at selected timepoints to collect tissues. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize TPS for a given number of sampling points and labeling duration and target a specific tissue of study. Currently, such techniques are missing in proteomics. Here, we report on a formula-based stochastic simulation strategy for TPS for in vivo studies with heavy water metabolic labeling and LC-MS. We model the rate constant (lognormal), measurement error (Laplace), peptide length (gamma), relative abundance of the monoisotopic peak (beta regression), and the number of exchangeable hydrogens (gamma regression). The parameters of the distributions are determined using the corresponding empirical probability density functions from a large-scale dataset of murine heart proteome. The models are used in the simulations of the rate constant to minimize the root-mean-square error (rmse). The rmse for different TPSs shows structured patterns. They are analyzed to elucidate common features in the patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LC−MS; conditional independence of relative abundance and number of exchangeable hydrogens; distribution of turnover rates; error of relative abundances; heavy water metabolic labeling; isotope distributions; model of protein degradation rate constant; protein turnover; stochastic simulations; timepoint selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32183509      PMCID: PMC8864836          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  23 in total

1.  Measurement of protein turnover rates by heavy water labeling of nonessential amino acids.

Authors:  Robert Busch; Yoo-Kyeong Kim; Richard A Neese; Valerie Schade-Serin; Michelle Collins; Mohamad Awada; James L Gardner; Carine Beysen; Michael E Marino; Lisa M Misell; Marc K Hellerstein
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-01-24

2.  Compartment modeling for mammalian protein turnover studies by stable isotope metabolic labeling.

Authors:  Shenheng Guan; John C Price; Sina Ghaemmaghami; Stanley B Prusiner; Alma L Burlingame
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Optimal timepoint sampling in high-throughput gene expression experiments.

Authors:  Bruce A Rosa; Ji Zhang; Ian T Major; Wensheng Qin; Jin Chen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  d2ome, Software for in Vivo Protein Turnover Analysis Using Heavy Water Labeling and LC-MS, Reveals Alterations of Hepatic Proteome Dynamics in a Mouse Model of NAFLD.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov; Jayant Avva; Mahbubur Rahman; Kwangwon Lee; Sergei Ilchenko; Takhar Kasumov; Ahmad Borzou
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Calculation of the Protein Turnover Rate Using the Number of Incorporated 2H Atoms and Proteomics Analysis of a Single Labeled Sample.

Authors:  Serguei Ilchenko; Andrew Haddad; Prabodh Sadana; Fabio A Recchia; Rovshan G Sadygov; Takhar Kasumov
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Selecting the most appropriate time points to profile in high-throughput studies.

Authors:  Michael Kleyman; Emre Sefer; Teodora Nicola; Celia Espinoza; Divya Chhabra; James S Hagood; Naftali Kaminski; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Ziv Bar-Joseph
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  High-Throughput Measurement of Lipid Turnover Rates Using Partial Metabolic Heavy Water Labeling.

Authors:  Byoungsook Goh; Jinwoo Kim; Seungwoo Seo; Tae-Young Kim
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Gene expression prediction by soft integration and the elastic net-best performance of the DREAM3 gene expression challenge.

Authors:  Mika Gustafsson; Michael Hörnquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  NITPicker: selecting time points for follow-up experiments.

Authors:  Daphne Ezer; Joseph Keir
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Assessment of cardiac proteome dynamics with heavy water: slower protein synthesis rates in interfibrillar than subsarcolemmal mitochondria.

Authors:  Takhar Kasumov; Erinne R Dabkowski; Kadambari Chandra Shekar; Ling Li; Rogerio F Ribeiro; Kenneth Walsh; Stephen F Previs; Rovshan G Sadygov; Belinda Willard; William C Stanley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.125

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using Heavy Mass Isotopomers for Protein Turnover in Heavy Water Metabolic Labeling.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Partial Isotope Profiles Are Sufficient for Protein Turnover Analysis Using Closed-Form Equations of Mass Isotopomer Dynamics.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Protein turnover models for LC-MS data of heavy water metabolic labeling.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for In Vivo Proteome Dynamics using Heavy Water Metabolic Labeling.

Authors:  Rovshan G Sadygov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.