| Literature DB >> 32183484 |
Sherry Shiqian Gao1, Kitty Jieyi Chen1, Duangporn Duangthip1, Edward Chin Man Lo1, Chun Hung Chu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the caries, periodontal status, and toothbrushing practices of Chinese elderly people with and without dementia.Entities:
Keywords: dementia; dental caries; elderly; periodontal diseases; survey; toothbrushing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32183484 PMCID: PMC7143847 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061913
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Age, sex, toothbrushing frequency, caregiver-assisted toothbrushing, difficulty in toothbrushing, and dental visit behavior of the elderly with or without dementia.
| Independent Variables | Elderly with Dementia | Elderly without Dementia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | (n = 129) | (n = 99) | 0.428 |
| 80.9 ± 7.5 | 79.4 ± 6.7 | ||
| Sex | (n = 129) | (n = 99) | 0.113 |
| Male | 32 (25%) | 16 (16%) | |
| Female | 97 (75%) | 83 (84%) | |
| Toothbrushing frequency | (n = 125) | (n = 99) | 0.189 |
| None or less than once daily | 4, 3% | 0, 0% | |
| Once daily | 19, 15% | 14, 14% | |
| Twice or more daily | 102, 82% | 85, 86% | |
| Caregiver-assisted toothbrushing | (n = 126) | (n = 98) | 0.001 |
| Yes | 22, 17% | 3, 3% | |
| No | 104, 83% | 95, 97% | |
| Difficulty in toothbrushing | (n = 115) | (n = 98) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 65, 57% | 8, 8% | |
| No | 50, 43% | 90, 92% | |
| Last dental visit | (n = 116) | (n = 88) | 0.241 |
| Within 1 year | 42, 36% | 39, 44% | |
| More than 1 year | 74, 64% | 49, 56% |
Caries experience, edentulous status, periodontal status, and oral hygiene condition of the elderly with or without dementia.
| Independent Variables | Elderly with Dementia | Elderly without Dementia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caries experience | (n = 129) | (n = 99) | |
| Decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) | 22.5 ± 7.9 | 19.2 ± 9.3 | 0.041 |
| Decayed teeth (DT) | 2.1 ± 3.1 | 2.3 ± 2.6 | 0.997 |
| Missing teeth (MT) | 16.5 ± 9.5 | 13.0 ± 9.2 | 0.528 |
| Filled teeth (FT) | 4.0 ± 4.6 | 3.9 ± 5.2 | 0.677 |
| Edentulous status | (n = 129) | (n = 99) | 0.059 |
| Non-edentulous | 115, 89% | 95, 96% | |
| Edentulous | 14, 11% | 4, 4% | |
| Gingival bleeding (GB) | (n = 100) | (n = 92) | 0.512 |
| No | 1, 1% | 2, 2% | |
| Yes | 99, 99% | 90, 98% | |
| Periodontal pocket (PP) | (n = 100) | (n = 92) | 0.478 |
| 0–3 mm | 28, 28% | 33, 36% | |
| 4–5 mm | 59, 59% | 47, 51% | |
| 6 mm or above | 13, 13% | 12, 13% | |
| Loss of attachment (LoA) | (n = 99) | (n = 92) | 0.967 |
| 0–3 mm | 13, 13% | 13, 14% | |
| 4–5 mm | 32, 32% | 29, 32% | |
| 6–8 mm | 40, 40% | 34, 37% | |
| 9–11 mm | 10, 10% | 12, 13% | |
| 12 mm or above | 4, 4% | 4, 4% | |
| Oral hygiene condition | (n = 108) | (n = 94) | 0.027 |
| Visible plaque index (VPI) | 77 ± 28 % | 63 ± 33 % |