| Literature DB >> 32183447 |
Bo Jiang1,2, Wenbing Yang3, Ziyang Zhang3, Xifeng Li3, Xueping Ren1, Yaoqi Wang2.
Abstract
In order to integrally manufacture the large TC4 titanium alloy part, an electrically-assisted incremental forming process is cleverly proposed to solve the traditional hot forming disadvantages of expensive heating furnaces and long cycle period. The two-step simulation method including thermal-electricity coupling simulation and thermo-mechanical coupling simulation was selected to predict the temperature variations and the sheet deformation behaviors. The electrically-assisted incremental forming experiment of thin TC4 titanium alloy sheet was performed. The highest prediction error is 6% for springback angles. The thrice forming at 10.9 A/mm2 satisfies the precision requirement of the designed part. Therefore, the two-step simulation method can effectively calculate the electrically-assisted incremental process. The electrically-assisted incremental forming technique is very promising for the integral producing large titanium alloy part.Entities:
Keywords: electrically-assisted incremental forming; springback; thin TC4 titanium alloy sheet; two-step simulation method
Year: 2020 PMID: 32183447 PMCID: PMC7143541 DOI: 10.3390/ma13061335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The geometry of forming die.
Figure 2The predicted and measured sheet temperature distributions at different average current densities: (a) 4.8 A/mm2, prediction, (b) 4.8 A/mm2, measurement, (c) 10.9 A/mm2, prediction, (d) 10.9 A/mm2, measurement.
Figure 3The springback angles of formed parts by prediction after thrice electrically-assisted forming at different average current densities: (a) Springback angle definition, (b) springback angles at different average current densities.
Figure 4Electrically-assisted forming setup and firstly formed parts: (a) Forming setup, (b) no pulse current, (c) 10.9 A/mm2.
The effects of forming times and current density on springback angles.
| Forming Times | Springback Angles at Different Current Densities (°) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.8 A/mm2 | 6.0 A/mm2 | 7.9 A/mm2 | 10.9 A/mm2 | |
| 1 | 86 | 86 | 75 | 68 |
| 2 | 71 | 70 | 55 | 50 |
| 3 | 70 | 65 | 45 | 42 |
Figure 5The formed parts after thrice forming at different current densities.
Figure 6The springback angle comparisons between simulation and experiment.