Literature DB >> 32182944

Intercomparison of Indoor Radon Measurements Under Field Conditions In the Framework of MetroRADON European Project.

Daniel Rabago1, Ismael Fuente1, Santiago Celaya1, Alicia Fernandez1, Enrique Fernandez1, Jorge Quindos1, Ricardo Pol1, Giorgia Cinelli2, Luis Quindos1, Carlos Sainz1.   

Abstract

Interlaboratory comparisons are a basic part of the regular quality controls of laboratories to warranty the adequate performance of test and measurements. The exercise presented in this article is the comparison of indoor radon gas measurements under field conditions performed with passive detectors and active monitors carried out in the Laboratory of Natural Radiation (LNR). The aim is to provide a direct comparison between different methodologies and to identify physical reasons for possible inconsistencies, particularly related to sampling and measurement techniques. The variation of radon concentration during the comparison showed a big range of values, with levels from approximately 0.5 to 30 kBq/m3. The reference values for the two exposure periods have been derived from a weighted average of participants' results applying an iterative algorithm. The indexes used to analyze the participants' results were the relative percentage difference D(%), the Zeta score ( ζ ), and the z-score ( z ). Over 80% of the results for radon in air exposure are within the interval defined by the reference value and 20% and 10% for the first and the second exposure, respectively. Most deviations were detected with the overestimating of the exposure using passive detectors due to the related degassing time of detector holder materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interlaboratory comparison; metrology; proficiency test; quality assurance; radon

Year:  2020        PMID: 32182944     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  5 in total

1.  A new approach to radon temporal correction factor based on active environmental monitoring devices.

Authors:  T Dicu; B D Burghele; M Botoş; A Cucoș; G Dobrei; Ș Florică; Ș Grecu; A Lupulescu; I Pap; K Szacsvai; A Țenter; C Sainz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Radon Adsorption in Charcoal.

Authors:  Andreas Maier; Jesse Jones; Sonja Sternkopf; Erik Friedrich; Claudia Fournier; Gerhard Kraft
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Residential Radon in Central and South America: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Giraldo-Osorio; Alberto Ruano-Ravina; Leonor Varela-Lema; Juan M Barros-Dios; Mónica Pérez-Ríos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Intercomparison of Radon Flux Monitors at Low and at High Radium Content Areas under Field Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Rábago; Luis Quindós; Arturo Vargas; Carlos Sainz; Ileana Radulescu; Mihail-Razvan Ioan; Francesco Cardellini; Marco Capogni; Alessandro Rizzo; Santiago Celaya; Ismael Fuente; Marta Fuente; Maria Rodriguez; Claudia Grossi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Radon Progeny Adsorption on Facial Masks.

Authors:  Annika Hinrichs; Claudia Fournier; Gerhard Kraft; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.