| Literature DB >> 32182647 |
Tomasz Kaźmierczak1, Piotr Niedzielski1, Witold Kaczorowski1.
Abstract
Diamond-like carbon (DLC) flakes were produced using a dual-frequency method: microwave/radiofrequency plasma-assisted chemical vapour deposition (MW/RF PACVD) with the use of methane or its mixture with gases such as hydrogen, argon, oxygen or nitrogen. Their modification was performed using a planetary ball mill with and without a fluid: deionised water or methanol. Changes occurring in the morphology of flake surfaces were presented in pictures taken using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Their composition and chemical structure were analysed using Raman spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The presented research results show that it is possible to control the size of flakes and their chemical structure. An increase in the C-C sp3 bond content in produced carbon-based materials is only possible by modifying DLC flakes during their production process by introducing oxygen or argon into the working chamber together with the carbon-carrying gas. In the processes of mechanical DLC flake modification, it is necessary to add fluid to limit the occurrence of graphitisation processes. The research conducted shows that methanol is best used for this purpose as its use results in a decrease in the percentage of C-C sp3 bonds as compared to the materials, before milling, of only 1.7%. A frequent problem both in the production of DLC flakes and during their mechanical modification is the introduction of additional elements into their structure. Admixing electrode materials from the plasma-chemical device (iron) or grinding beads (zirconium) to DLC flakes was observed in our studies. These processes can be limited by the appropriate selection of production conditions or by mechanical modifications.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; diamond-like carbon; flakes; milling; plasma
Year: 2020 PMID: 32182647 PMCID: PMC7085027 DOI: 10.3390/ma13051209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Parameters of carbon powder production processes.
| RF Power [W] | MW Power [W] | Gas Flow [sccm] | Pressure [Pa] | Time of Deposition [min] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH4 | H2 | Ar | O2 | N2 | ||||
| 500 | 500 | 180 | - | - | - | - | 100–130 | 120–200 |
| 20 | - | - | - | 120 | ||||
| - | 20 | - | - | 120 | ||||
| - | - | 20 | - | 120 | ||||
| - | - | - | 20 | 120 | ||||
Figure 1Powder produced using (a) methane; (b) methane and hydrogen mixture; (c) methane and argon mixture; (d) methane and oxygen mixture; and (e) methane and nitrogen mixture.
Figure 2Raman spectra of powder produced using (a) methane; (b) methane and hydrogen mixture; (c) methane and argon mixture; (d) methane and oxygen mixture; and (e) methane and nitrogen mixture.
Analysis of Raman spectra of produced carbon flakes.
| Sample | ID/IG | G Position (cm−1) | D Position (cm−1) | FWHM of G Peak (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.63 | 1521 | 1299 | 177 |
|
| 0.65 | 1521 | 1303 | 177 |
|
| 0.60 | 1519 | 1274 | 186 |
|
| 0.46 | 1519 | 1264 | 192 |
|
| 2.64 | 1582 | 1333 | 115 |
Analysis of chemical and phase composition of produced carbon flakes.
| Sample | Structural Composition | Chemical Composition | sp3/ (sp3+sp2) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C=C sp2 (284.5 eV) | C-C sp3 (285.3 eV) | C=N (285.9 eV) | C-O (286.1 eV) | C-N (287 eV) | C=O (288 eV) | C (%) | 0 (%) | Fe (%) | N (%) | ||
|
| 68.1 | 24.3 | 0.4 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 92.8 | 6.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.26 |
|
| 68.9 | 24.0 | 0.1 | 6.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 92.6 | 6.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.25 |
|
| 64.6 | 27.1 | 0.3 | 7.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 91.5 | 7.9 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.29 |
|
| 54.6 | 28.8 | 0.6 | 10.7 | 0.2 | 5.1 | 82.1 | 16.9 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.35 |
|
| 67.7 | 20.5 | 2.7 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 87.8 | 6.1 | 0.1 | 6.0 | 0.23 |
Figure 3Analysis of C1 peaks obtained in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies of carbon flakes produced using (a) methane; (b) methane and hydrogen mixture; (c) methane and argon mixture; (d) methane and oxygen mixture; and (e) methane and nitrogen mixture.
Figure 4SEM pictures of powders: (a) produced using the chemical vapour deposition (CVD) method; (b) dry-milled; (c) milled in water; (d) milled in methanol.
Figure 5Raman spectra of powders: (a) produced using the CVD method; (b) dry-milled; (c) milled in water; (d) milled in methanol.
Analysis of Raman spectra of powders produced using the CVD method, dry-milled, milled in water, milled in methanol.
| Sample | ID/IG | G Position (cm−1) | D Position (cm−1) | FWHM of G Peak (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.60 | 1528 | 1327 | 169 |
|
| 0.75 | 1523 | 1299 | 159 |
|
| 0.61 | 1526 | 1340 | 158 |
|
| 0.60 | 1526 | 1314 | 166 |
Analysis of chemical and phase composition of powders produced using the CVD method, dry-milled, milled in water, milled in methanol.
| Sample | Structural Composition | Chemical Composition | sp3/(sp3 + sp2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C=C sp2 (284.5 eV) | C-C sp3 (285.3 eV) | C-O (286.1 eV) | C=O (288 eV) | C (%) | 0 (%) | Zr (%) | ||
|
| 66.1 | 25.9 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 90.5 | 9.5 | - | 0.28 |
|
| 75.2 | 11.0 | 11.3 | 2.5 | 85.7 | 13.8 | 0.5 | 0.13 |
|
| 66.8 | 21.6 | 11.6 | - | 88.3 | 11.6 | 0.1 | 0.24 |
|
| 62.1 | 24.2 | 11.1 | 2.6 | 87.4 | 12.8 | 0.8 | 0.28 |
Figure 6Analysis of C1s peaks obtained in XPS tests of powders produced using (a)the CVD method; (b) dry-milled; (c) milled in water; (d) milled in methanol.