| Literature DB >> 32182577 |
J Michael Maurer1, Subhadip Paul2, Nathaniel E Anderson2, Prashanth K Nyalakanti2, Kent A Kiehl3.
Abstract
Youth with elevated psychopathic traits represent a particularly severe subgroup of adolescents characterized by extreme behavioral problems and exhibit comparable neurocognitive deficits as adult offenders with psychopathic traits. A consistent finding among adults with elevated psychopathic traits is reduced white matter structural integrity of the right uncinate fasciculus (UF). The UF is a major white matter tract that connects regions of the anterior temporal lobe (i.e., the amygdala) to higher-order executive control regions, including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. However, the relationship between youth psychopathic traits and structural integrity of the UF has been mixed, with some studies identifying a negative relationship between adolescent psychopathy scores and FA in the UF, and others identifying a positive relationship. Here, we investigated structural integrity of the left and right UF using fractional anisotropy (FA) in a large sample of n = 254 male adolescent offenders recruited from maximum-security juvenile correctional facilities. Psychopathic traits were assessed using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV). Consistent with hypotheses, interpersonal and affective traits (i.e., PCL:YV Factor 1 and Facet 1 scores) were associated with reduced FA in the right UF. Additionally, lifestyle traits (i.e., PCL:YV Facet 3 scores) were associated with increased FA in the left UF. Results are consistent with previously published studies reporting reduced FA in the right UF in adult psychopathic offenders and increased left UF FA in youth meeting criteria for certain externalizing disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Callous-unemotional traits; Diffusion tensor imaging; Fractional anisotropy; Juvenile delinquency; Uncinate fasciculus
Year: 2020 PMID: 32182577 PMCID: PMC7076567 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Anatomical location of the left and right uncinate fasciculus, defined as per the JHU atlas, is displayed on the JHU template. The left uncinate fasciculus is outlined in the color blue and the right uncinate fasciculus is outlined in the color green. R = right; L = left; A = anterior; S = superior; I = inferior; P = posterior.
Correlations between PCL:YV scores and Covariate measures.
| PCL:YV Total | PCL:YV F1 | PCL:YV F2 | PCL:YV Facet 1 | PCL:YV Facet 2 | PCL:YV Facet 3 | PCL:YV Facet 4 | Sub Use | IQ | Avg. FA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCL:YV Total | ____ | |||||||||
| PCL:YV F1 | .881 | ____ | ||||||||
| PCL:YV F2 | .833 | .516 | ____ | |||||||
| PCL:YV Facet 1 | .722 | .858 | .377 | ____ | ||||||
| PCL:YV Facet 2 | .766 | .828 | .498 | .421 | ____ | |||||
| PCL:YV Facet 3 | .726 | .459 | .861 | .375 | .401 | ____ | ||||
| PCL:YV Facet 4 | .638 | .384 | .777 | .233 | .423 | .349 | ____ | |||
| Num. Sub. Dep. | .040 | −.074 | .140 | .000 | −.130 | .117 | .115 | ____ | ||
| IQ | −.095 | −.063 | −.129 | .024 | −.136 | −.137 | −.068 | .297 | ____ | |
| Avg. FA | .040 | .091 | −.020 | .115 | .034 | .004 | −.042 | −.005 | .086 | ___ |
Note. Assessments: PCL:YV F1 and F2 are the factor scores derived from the PCL:YV (Forth et al., 2003); Num. Sub. Dep. refers to the number of substance dependencies obtained from the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) (Kaufman et al., 1997); Avg. FA refers to the TBSS-skeleton average FA value.
p < .001,.
p < .05.
Multiple Regression Analyses with PCL:YV scores entered with Covariates Predicting FA in the Right UF.
| Regression 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | B | SE B | t | β | Sig. |
| PCL:YV Facet 1 | −0.001 | .000 | −2.062 | −.104 | .040 |
| PCL:YV Facet 2 | −0.001 | .001 | −0.917 | −.050 | .360 |
| PCL:YV Facet 3 | 0.001 | .001 | 1.894 | .097 | .059 |
| PCL:YV Facet 4 | −0.000 | .001 | −0.025 | −.001 | .980 |
| Num. Sub. Dep. | 0.001 | .001 | 2.345 | .112 | .020 |
| IQ | 0.000 | .000 | 1.414 | .066 | .159 |
| Avg. FA | 0.891 | .055 | 16.130 | .711 | < .001 |
Note. Regression 1: R2 = 0.534, R = 0.731, F(253) = 40.261, p < .001; Regression 2: R2 = 0.531, R = 0.729, F(253) = 56.248, p < .001; Regression 3: R2 = 0.521, R = 0.722, F(253) = 67.766, p < .001. Significant results are those that survive a Simes-Hochberg multiple comparison correction.
Multiple Regression Analyses with PCL:YV scores entered with Covariates Predicting FA in the Left UF.
| Regression 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | B | SE B | t | β | Sig. |
| PCL:YV Facet 1 | −0.001 | .000 | −1.473 | −.061 | .142 |
| PCL:YV Facet 2 | 0.000 | .000 | −0.548 | −.024 | .584 |
| PCL:YV Facet 3 | 0.001 | .000 | 2.138 | .090 | .034 |
| PCL:YV Facet 4 | −0.001 | .001 | −0.976 | −.040 | .330 |
| Num. Sub. Dep. | 0.001 | .001 | 1.142 | .045 | .254 |
| IQ | 0.000 | .000 | 1.105 | .043 | .270 |
| Avg. FA | 1.088 | .048 | 22.600 | .821 | < .001 |
Note. Regression 1: R2 = 0.684, R = 0.827, F(253) = 75.997, p < .001; Regression 2: R2 = 0.679, R = 0.824, F(253) = 104.898, p < .001; Regression 3: R2 = 0.676, R = 0.822, F(253) = 129.697, p < .001. Significant results are those that survive a Simes–Hochberg multiple comparison correction.