| Literature DB >> 32181283 |
Li Lin1, Ying Wang1, Luyao Liu1, Wenjing Ying1, Wenjie Wang1, Bijun Sun1, Jinqiao Sun1, Xiaochuan Wang1.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that RIPK1 is associated with inflammation and apoptotic. RIPK1 deficiency leads to proinflammatory signaling impaired. However, only few patients with homozygous loss-of-function mutation in RIPK1 gene had been reported until now. Here, we report a Chinese combined immunodeficiency patient. He had recurrent infection, diarrhea after 3 months old. Immune function indicated that T, B and NK cells decreased significantly but immunoglobulins approximately remained normal. Whole-exome sequencing indicated that he had novel compound heterozygous mutations (c.998 C > A from his mother and c.1934 C > T from his father) in RIPK1 gene, which were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Our study reports novel mutations in RIPK1 gene and new phenotype of patient with RIPK1 deficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Combined immunodeficiency; Inflammatory bowel disease; Mutation; RIPK1
Year: 2019 PMID: 32181283 PMCID: PMC7063410 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2019.10.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Dis ISSN: 2352-3042
Serum immunoglobulin level of patient in different age.
| Age (month) | 2 | 4 | 15 | 17 | 24 | 29 | 41 | Reference value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | 11.2 | 15.77 ↑ | 16.32 ↑ | 11.25 | 12.15 | 14.2 ↑ | 4.95–12.74 (g/L) | |
| 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 2.25 ↑ | 0.33–1.89 (g/L) | |
| 0.34 | 0.87 | 1.09 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.65–2.01 (g/L) | |
| 58.7 | 4.1 | 13.1 | <17.8 | <17.9 | 23.3 | 8 | <100 (KU/L) |
The numbers and percent of T, B and NK cells of the patient.
| Age (month) | 15 | 17 | 24 | 29 | 41 | Reference value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total T cell (cells/μL) | 4735.62 | – | – | 2942.50 | 1631.30 | 1794–4247 |
| Total T cell (%) | 83.65 ↑ | 87.21 ↑ | 89.75 ↑ | 87.65 ↑ | 83.4 ↑ | 53.88–72.87 |
| CD4 T cell (cells/μL) | 1286.59 | – | – | 628.33 ↓ | 449.42 ↓ | 902–2253 |
| CD4 T cell (%) | 22.73 | 14.89 ↓ | 20.60 | 18.72 ↓ | 22.98 | 24.08–42.52 |
| CD8 T cell (cells/μL) | 3229.16 ↑ | – | – | 2012.29 ↑ | 1159.54 | 580–1735 |
| CD8 T cell (%) | 57.04 ↑ | 63.12 ↑ | 62.45 ↑ | 59.94 ↑ | 59.28 ↑ | 19.00–31.51 |
| Total B cell (cells/μL) | 398.66 ↓ | – | – | 218.69 ↓ | 158.34 ↓ | 461–1456 |
| Total B cell (%) | 7.04 ↓ | 4.13 ↓ | 4.15 ↓ | 6.51 ↓ | 8.09 ↓ | 13.23–26.39 |
| NK cell (cells/μL) | 508.60 | – | – | 179.52 | 124.75 ↓ | 270–1053 |
| NK cell (%) | 8.98 | 7.30 | 4.6 ↓ | 5.53 ↓ | 6.38 ↓ | 7.21–20.90 |
| CD4/CD8 | 0.4 ↓ | 0.23 ↓ | 0.33 ↓ | 0.31 ↓ | 0.39 ↓ | 0.9–2.13 |
Lymphocyte subpopulation of the patient at 41 months old.
| Value (%) | Reference value (%) (1–4 year old) | |
|---|---|---|
| 50.8 ↑ | 19.00–32.51 | |
| Central memory cytotoxic T cells (CD8 CM, CD3 + CD8 + CD45RA - CD27 + ) | 49.3 ↑ | 5.18–31.66 |
| Naive differentiated cytotoxic T cells (CD8 Naive, CD3 + CD8 + CD45RA + CD27 + ) | 0.4 ↓ | 36.8–83.16 |
| Effector memory cytotoxic T cells (CD8 EM, CD3 + CD8 + CD45RA - CD27 - ) | 50.2 ↑ | 0.7–11.22 |
| Terminally differentiated effector memory cytotoxic T cells (CD8 TEMRA, CD3 + CD8 + CD45RA + CD27 - ) | 0.2 ↓ | 0.84–33.02 |
| 40.10 | 24.08–42.52 | |
| Central memory helper T cells (CD4 CM, CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA - CD27 + ) | 73.1 ↑ | 13.88–48.12 |
| Naive differentiated helper T cells (CD4 Naive, CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA + CD27 + ) | 9.2 ↓ | 46.14–84.4 |
| Effector memory helper T cells (CD4 EM, CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA - CD27 - ) | 17.3 ↑ | 0.94–6.46 |
| Terminally differentiated effector memory helper T cells (CD4 TEMRA, CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA + CD27 - ) | 0.30 | 0–1.36 |
| γδ T cells (γδ T, CD3 + TCRγδ + ) | 7.70 | 4.94–17.98 |
| TCRαβ+ double-negative T (DNT) cells (CD3 + TCRαβ + CD4 - CD8 - ) | 7.2 ↑ | 0.37–1.80 |
| 10.6 ↓ | 13.23–26.39 | |
| Memory B cells (CD19 + CD27 + IgD - ) | 2.3 ↓ | 2.98–14.18 |
| Naïve B cells (CD19 + CD27 - IgD + ) | 89.20 | 65.54–86.62 |
| Transitional B cells (CD19 + CD24 + + CD38 + + | 34.2 ↑ | 5.24–17.22 |
| Plasmablasts (CD19 + CD24 - CD38 + + ) | 5.00 | 0.5–7.06 |
Figure 1Lymphocyte subpopulation of the patient at 41 months old. For T lymphocytes, the percentage of central memory helper T cells (CD4 CM, CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA - CD27V+ ) and effector memory helper T cells (CD4 EM, CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA - CD27 - ) were dramatically rising while naive differentiated helper T cells (CD4 Naive, CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA + CD27 + ) obviously dwindled. A similar change was found in the central memory cytotoxic T cells (CD8 CM, CD3 + CD8 + CD45RA - CD27 + ), effector memory cytotoxic T cells (CD8 EM, CD3 + CD8 + CD45RA - CD27 - ) and naive differentiated cytotoxic T cells (CD8 Naive, CD3 + CD8 + CD45RA + CD27 + ), respectively. In addition, TCRαβ+ double-negative T (DNT) cell was double increased. For B lymphocytes, transitional B cells (CD19 + CD24 + + CD38 + + ) rose markedly while memory B cells (CD19 + CD27 + IgD - ) reduced slightly.
Figure 2The mutation in RIPK1 gene of the patient (A) The above figure illustrates that patient carries RIPK1 compound heterozygous mutation in c.998 C > A (p. S333X, from his mother) and c.1934 C > T (p. T645M, from his father). The black arrow shows the mutation. All RIPK1 mutation sites from literature are indicated in blue while mutations in this study are shown in red in the lower image. X represents stop. The schematic representation of RIPK1 mutation is plotted with DOG. (B) CADD vs MAF plot of RIPK1 by PopViz. The horizontal and vertical axis shows MAF and CADD scores, respectively. The MAF score is −7 and the CADD score is 39, which indicates that the novel mutation c.998 C > A in our patients is malignant.