| Literature DB >> 32181240 |
Jianbo Jia1,2, Yue Sun1, Yaojie Zhang1, Quanrun Liu1, Jianliang Cao1, Guangxu Huang1,2, Baolin Xing1,2, Chuanxiang Zhang1,2, Lina Zhang1, Yijun Cao2.
Abstract
Low-cost and earth-abundant coal has been considered to have a unique structural superiority as carbon sources of carbon quantum dots (CQDs). However, it is still difficult to obtain CQDs from raw coal due to its compactibility and lower reactivity, and the majority of the current coal-based CQDs usually emit green or blue fluorescence. Herein, a facile two-step oxidation approach (K2FeO4 pre-oxidation and H2O2 oxidation) was proposed to fabricate bandgap tunable CQDs from anthracite. The K2FeO4 pre-oxidation can not only weaken the non-bonding forces among coal molecules which cause the expansion of coal particles, but also form a large number of active sites on the surface of coal particles. The above effects make the bandgap tunable CQDs (blue, green, or yellow fluorescence) can be quickly obtained from anthracite within 1 h in the following H2O2 oxidation by simply adjusting the concentration of H2O2. All the as-prepared CQDs contain more than 30 at% oxygen, and the average diameters of which are <10 nm. The results also indicate that the high oxygen content only can create new energy states inside the band gap of CQDs with average diameter more than 3.2 ± 0.9 nm, which make the as-prepared CQDs emit green or yellow fluorescence.Entities:
Keywords: anthracite; bandgap engineering; carbon quantum dots; coal; photoluminescent
Year: 2020 PMID: 32181240 PMCID: PMC7059121 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1(a) The disperse of anthracite in water (left: raw coal, right: oxidized coal). SEM images of (b) raw coal and (c) oxidized coal. (d) XRD and (e) FTIR spectra of raw coal and oxidized coal. (f) Schematic illustration of CQDs synthesis.
Figure 2(A) Aqoeous solution of CQDs under sunlight and UV light (the left cuvette is CQDs-N10-Y solution, the middle cuvette is CQDs-N20-G solution and the right cuvette is CQDs-N20-G solution). The TEM images, HRTEM images, and size distributions of (B) CQDs-N10-Y, (C) CQDs-N20-G, and (D) CQDs-N30-B.
Figure 3XRD patterns of CQDs-N10-Y, CQDs-N20-G, and CQDs-N30-B.
Figure 4(A) FTIR and (B) Raman spectra of CQDs-N10-Y, CQDs-N20-G, and CQDs-N30-B.
Figure 5(A) XPS survey spectra of CQDs-N10-Y, CQDs-N20-G, and CQDs-N30-B. C 1s high resolution XPS spectra of (B) CQDs-N10-Y, (C) CQDs-N20-G, and (D) CQDs-N30-B. (E) Summary of relative percentage of different functional groups on the surface of CQDs from (B) to (D).
Element content of the as-prepared CQDs calculated based on XPS analysis (atom %).
| CQDs-N10-Y | 63.8 | 34.4 |
| CQDs-N20-G | 57.1 | 40.9 |
| CQDs-N30-B | 55.9 | 42.6 |
Figure 6(A) UV-vis absorption spectra of CQDs-N10-Y, CQDs-N20-G, and CQDs-N30-B. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of (B) CQDs-N10-Y, (C) CQDs-N20-G, and (D) CQDs-N30-B at different excitation wavelengths.