| Literature DB >> 32180910 |
Ravindra Kumar1, Mendi Prem Shyam Sundar Singh1, Soumendu Mahapatra1, Sonam Chaurasia1, Malay Kumar Tripathi2, John Oommen3, Praveen K Bharti4, Rajasubramaniam Shanmugam1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to enumerate the clinical, hematological, and molecular spectrum of G6PD deficiency in malaria endemic regions of south west Odisha.Entities:
Keywords: G6PD; Malaria; Molecular spectrum; Tribes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32180910 PMCID: PMC7059741 DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2020.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis ISSN: 2035-3006 Impact factor: 2.576
Figure 1Map showing Kalahandi and Rayagada districts (study area) in Odisha state, India.
Distribution of clinical parameters between age, gender and tribal status matched G6PD deficient and normal subjects.
| Variable | G6PD Normal | G6PD Deficient | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pallor | 10(16.9) | 5(8.5) | 0.269 |
| Fatigue | 5(8.5) | 4(6.8) | 1.000 |
| H/O Anemia | 10(16.9) | 13(22.0) | 0.643 |
| H/O Fever | 18(30.5) | 13(22.0) | 0.403 |
| H/O blood Transfusion | 2(3.4) | 4(6.8) | 0.679 |
| H/O Joint Pain | 9(15.3) | 13(22.0) | 0.479 |
| H/O Body Pain | 8(13.6) | 8(13.6) | 1.000 |
| H/O Back Pain | 13(22.0) | 11(18.6) | 0.820 |
| H/O Malaria | 27(45.8) | 26(44.1) | 1.000 |
Number in parenthesis () represents percentages, P value was calculated using Fisher’s Exact Test.
Demographic details of study cohort.
| Variable | G6PD Normal | G6PD Deficient | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Age (in Years) | 24(13–15) | 18(8–32) | 0.011 |
| Male | 742(96.0%) | 31(4.0%) | 0.041, OR=0.578, 95% CI=0.350–0.956 |
| Female | 1180(97.7%) | 28(2.3%) | |
| Tribe | 454(95.2%) | 23(4.8%) | 0.012, OR=2.014, 95%CI =1.206–3.365 |
| Non-Tribe | 1468(97.6%) | 36(2.4%) |
P value for difference in age was calculated using Mann Whitney U Test whereas Fisher’s exact test was applied to see the difference of prevalence of G6PD deficiency among different gender and tribal status.
Figure 2Flow Chart showing the study site and G6PD status in the Odisha state, India.
Figure 3Boxplot showing G6PD activity among different gender.
Anemia status in different settings.
| Anemia | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Mild | Moderate | Severe | ||
| Hospital Setting | 90(18.4) | 129(26.4) | 232(47.4) | 38(7.8) | 489 |
| Community Setting | 515(49.1) | 277(26.4) | 245(23.4) | 12(1.1) | 1049 |
| Total | 605(39.3) | 406(26.4) | 477(31.0) | 50(3.3) | 1538 |
Number in parenthesis () represents percentages. Chi Square for trend P <0.0001.
Hematological profile of age, gender and tribal status matched G6PD deficient and normal subjects.
| Variable | G6PD Normal | G6PD Deficient | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (Hb) | 12.0±2.2 | 12.1±1.9 | 0.772 |
| Hematocrit (HCT) | 38.6±6.6 | 38.5±5.9 | 0.914 |
| Mean Cell Volume (MCV) | 77.5±9.1 | 79.3±8.9 | 0.331 |
| Mean Cell hemoglobin (MCH) | 24.1±3.4 | 25.0±3.4 | 0.167 |
P value was calculated using the independent sample student “t” test.
Figure 4Electropherograms of the G6PD Kaiping and G6PD Union variants.