Literature DB >> 32180061

Environmental factors, serum biomarkers and risk of atrial fibrillation: an exposure-wide umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Lazaros Belbasis1, Michail C Mavrogiannis1, Maria Emfietzoglou1, Evangelos Evangelou2,3.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. We designed an umbrella review to systematically assess the epidemiological credibility of the associations of non-genetic factors with risk of AF. We searched PubMed and EMBASE from inception to December 31, 2018 to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies for the association of non-genetic factors with risk of AF. For each meta-analysis, we used the random-effects model, and we estimated the 95% confidence and prediction intervals. We also assessed between-study heterogeneity, small-study effects and excess significance bias. We identified 34 eligible papers that examined 51 associations of 42 unique non-genetic factors with risk of AF. Eighteen associations remained statistically significant at P value < 1 × 10-6. Thirty-one associations presented large or very large between-study heterogeneity. Eight associations presented evidence for small-study effects and 13 associations had evidence for excess significance bias. Ten associations, i.e. corrected QT interval, alcohol consumption (highest vs. lowest category, per 1 drink/day increase), body mass index (> 30 units vs. < 30 units, per 5 units increase), waist circumference, body weight, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and smoking (ever vs. never, per 10 cigarettes/day increase) were supported by convincing or highly suggestive evidence in meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, markers of adiposity, alcohol consumption, smoking, and corrected QT interval constitute credible risk factors of AF. Our proposed grading may guide the design of future studies, including Mendelian randomization studies, to assess whether these associations are causal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Bias; Epidemiological credibility; Meta-analysis; Risk factors; Umbrella review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32180061     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-020-00618-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  5 in total

1.  Risk and Protective Factors for Sudden Cardiac Death: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsartsalis; Dafni Korela; Lars O Karlsson; Emmanouil Foukarakis; Anneli Svensson; Aris Anastasakis; Dimitrios Venetsanos; Constantina Aggeli; Costas Tsioufis; Frieder Braunschweig; Elena Dragioti; Emmanouil Charitakis
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 2.  Methodological approaches for assessing certainty of the evidence in umbrella reviews: A scoping review.

Authors:  Saranrat Sadoyu; Kaniz Afroz Tanni; Nontaporn Punrum; Sobhon Paengtrai; Warittakorn Kategaew; Nattiwat Promchit; Nai Ming Lai; Ammarin Thakkinstian; Surachat Ngorsuraches; Mukdarut Bangpan; Sajesh Veettil; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The Association between Treatment with Bisphosphonates and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Park; Hae-Jin Ko
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2022-01-20

4.  The Effect of the Clinical Supervision Model on Nurses' Performance in Atrial Fibrillation Care.

Authors:  Maryam Mokhtari; Asghar Khalifehzadeh-Esfahani; Shahla Mohamadirizi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  Validity of observational evidence on putative risk and protective factors: appraisal of 3744 meta-analyses on 57 topics.

Authors:  Perrine Janiaud; Arnav Agarwal; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Evropi Theodoratou; Konstantinos K Tsilidis; Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.150

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.