Literature DB >> 32179675

The intelligent knife (iKnife) and its intraoperative diagnostic advantage for the treatment of cervical disease.

Menelaos Tzafetas1,2,3, Anita Mitra1,2,3, Maria Paraskevaidi1,2, Zsolt Bodai1,2, Ilkka Kalliala1,2,4, Sarah Bowden1,2,3, Konstantinos Lathouras3, Francesca Rosini1,2, Marcell Szasz5, Adele Savage1,2, Julia Balog1,2,6, James McKenzie1,2, Deirdre Lyons3, Phillip Bennett1,2,3, David MacIntyre1,2, Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami1,2,3, Zoltan Takats7,2, Maria Kyrgiou7,2,3.   

Abstract

Clearance of surgical margins in cervical cancer prevents the need for adjuvant chemoradiation and allows fertility preservation. In this study, we determined the capacity of the rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS), also known as intelligent knife (iKnife), to discriminate between healthy, preinvasive, and invasive cervical tissue. Cervical tissue samples were collected from women with healthy, human papilloma virus (HPV) ± cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), or cervical cancer. A handheld diathermy device generated surgical aerosol, which was transferred into a mass spectrometer for subsequent chemical analysis. Combination of principal component and linear discriminant analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was employed to study the spectral differences between groups. Significance of discriminatory m/z features was tested using univariate statistics and tandem MS performed to elucidate the structure of the significant peaks allowing separation of the two classes. We analyzed 87 samples (normal = 16, HPV ± CIN = 50, cancer = 21 patients). The iKnife discriminated with 100% accuracy normal (100%) vs. HPV ± CIN (100%) vs. cancer (100%) when compared to histology as the gold standard. When comparing normal vs. cancer samples, the accuracy was 100% with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 83.9 to 100) and specificity 100% (79.4 to 100). Univariate analysis revealed significant MS peaks in the cancer-to-normal separation belonging to various classes of complex lipids. The iKnife discriminates healthy from premalignant and invasive cervical lesions with high accuracy and can improve oncological outcomes and fertility preservation of women treated surgically for cervical cancer. Larger in vivo research cohorts are required to validate these findings.
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  REIMS; cervical cancer; fertility preservation; iKnife; mass spectrometry

Year:  2020        PMID: 32179675      PMCID: PMC7132269          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1916960117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  Radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  John B Schlaerth; Nicola M Spirtos; Alan C Schlaerth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Radiotherapy and chemoradiation after surgery for early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Linda Rogers; Shing Shun N Siu; David Luesley; Andrew Bryant; Heather O Dickinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

3.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium.

Authors:  Sergio Pecorelli
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer.

Authors:  F Landoni; A Maneo; A Colombo; F Placa; R Milani; P Perego; G Favini; L Ferri; C Mangioni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  David Cibula; Richard Pötter; François Planchamp; Elisabeth Avall-Lundqvist; Daniela Fischerova; Christine Haie Meder; Christhardt Köhler; Fabio Landoni; Sigurd Lax; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Umesh Mahantshetty; Patrice Mathevet; W Glenn McCluggage; Mary McCormack; Raj Naik; Remi Nout; Sandro Pignata; Jordi Ponce; Denis Querleu; Francesco Raspagliesi; Alexandros Rodolakis; Karl Tamussino; Pauline Wimberger; Maria Rosaria Raspollini
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Psychological distress associated with colposcopy: patients' perception.

Authors:  Samina Tahseen; P C Reid
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Accuracy of intraoperative pathological examination of SLN in cervical cancer.

Authors:  A Martínez; E Mery; T Filleron; L Boileau; G Ferron; D Querleu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Identification of phosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylcholine as novel biomarkers for cervical cancers in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ming-Zhu Yin; Shu Tan; Xia Li; Yan Hou; Guosheng Cao; Kang Li; Junping Kou; Ge Lou
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-13

Review 9.  Hooked on fat: the role of lipid synthesis in cancer metabolism and tumour development.

Authors:  Franziska Baenke; Barrie Peck; Heike Miess; Almut Schulze
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.758

10.  A novel methodology for in vivo endoscopic phenotyping of colorectal cancer based on real-time analysis of the mucosal lipidome: a prospective observational study of the iKnife.

Authors:  James Alexander; Louise Gildea; Julia Balog; Abigail Speller; James McKenzie; Laura Muirhead; Alasdair Scott; Christos Kontovounisios; Shanawaz Rasheed; Julian Teare; Jonathan Hoare; Kirill Veselkov; Robert Goldin; Paris Tekkis; Ara Darzi; Jeremy Nicholson; James Kinross; Zoltan Takats
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of lipid flux to advance translational research: evolution of classic methods to the future of precision health.

Authors:  Amadeo F Salvador; Chi-Ren Shyu; Elizabeth J Parks
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 12.153

2.  Shotgun Lipidomics for Differential Diagnosis of HPV-Associated Cervix Transformation.

Authors:  Natalia L Starodubtseva; Vitaliy V Chagovets; Maria E Nekrasova; Niso M Nazarova; Alisa O Tokareva; Olga V Bourmenskaya; Djamilja I Attoeva; Eugenii N Kukaev; Dmitriy Y Trofimov; Vladimir E Frankevich; Gennady T Sukhikh
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Laser-assisted rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (LA-REIMS) as a metabolomics platform in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Maria Paraskevaidi; Simon J S Cameron; Eilbhe Whelan; Sarah Bowden; Menelaos Tzafetas; Anita Mitra; Anita Semertzidou; Antonis Athanasiou; Phillip R Bennett; David A MacIntyre; Zoltan Takats; Maria Kyrgiou
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 4.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Omics for the Characterization of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Bio-Signature.

Authors:  Ioana-Ecaterina Pralea; Radu-Cristian Moldovan; Adrian-Bogdan Țigu; Corina Ionescu; Cristina-Adela Iuga
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-12-12

5.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Differentiation of Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Nontumor Regions With the SpiderMass Technology.

Authors:  Nina Ogrinc; Christophe Attencourt; Emilien Colin; Ahmed Boudahi; Riad Tebbakha; Michel Salzet; Sylvie Testelin; Stéphanie Dakpé; Isabelle Fournier
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 6.  Recent advances in on-site mass spectrometry analysis for clinical applications.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhou; Wenpeng Zhang; Zheng Ouyang
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 12.296

7.  Rapid diagnosis and tumor margin assessment during pancreatic cancer surgery with the MasSpec Pen technology.

Authors:  Mary E King; Jialing Zhang; John Q Lin; Kyana Y Garza; Rachel J DeHoog; Clara L Feider; Alena Bensussan; Marta Sans; Anna Krieger; Sunil Badal; Michael F Keating; Spencer Woody; Sadhna Dhingra; Wendong Yu; Christopher Pirko; Kirtan A Brahmbhatt; George Van Buren; William E Fisher; James Suliburk; Livia S Eberlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Electrocautery, Diathermy, and Surgical Energy Devices: Are Surgical Teams at Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Kimberley Zakka; Simon Erridge; Swathikan Chidambaram; Michael Kynoch; James Kinross; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Metabolomic Phenotyping of Gliomas: What Can We Get with Simplified Protocol for Intact Tissue Analysis?

Authors:  Paulina Zofia Goryńska; Kamila Chmara; Bogumiła Kupcewicz; Krzysztof Goryński; Karol Jaroch; Dariusz Paczkowski; Jacek Furtak; Marek Harat; Barbara Bojko
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Prospects and challenges of cancer systems medicine: from genes to disease networks.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Karimi; Amir Hossein Karimi; Shamsozoha Abolmaali; Mehdi Sadeghi; Ulf Schmitz
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 11.622

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.