| Literature DB >> 32179580 |
Keith B Moore1, Cheryl K Mitchell1, Ya-Ping Lin1, Yuan-Hao Lee1, Eyad Shihabeddin1,2, John O'Brien3,2.
Abstract
A variety of electrical synapses are capable of activity-dependent plasticity, including both activity-dependent potentiation and activity-dependent depression. In several types of neurons, activity-dependent electrical synapse plasticity depends on changes in the local Ca2+ environment. To enable study of local Ca2+ signaling that regulates plasticity, we developed a GCaMP Ca2+ biosensor fused to the electrical synapse protein Connexin 36 (Cx36). Cx36-GCaMP transfected into mammalian cell cultures formed gap junctions at cell-cell boundaries and supported Neurobiotin tracer coupling that was regulated by protein kinase A signaling in the same way as Cx36. Cx36-GCaMP gap junctions robustly reported local Ca2+ increases in response to addition of a Ca2+ ionophore with increases in fluorescence that recovered during washout. Recovery was strongly dependent on Na+-Ca2+ exchange activity. In cells transfected with NMDA receptor subunits, Cx36-GCaMP revealed transient and concentration-dependent increases in local Ca2+ on brief application of glutamate. In HeLa cells, glutamate application increased Cx36-GCaMP tracer coupling through a mechanism that depended in part on Ca2+, calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) activity. This potentiation of coupling did not require exogenous expression of glutamate receptors, but could be accomplished by endogenously expressed glutamate receptors with pharmacological characteristics reminiscent of NMDA and kainate receptors. Analysis of RNA Sequencing data from HeLa cells confirmed expression of NMDA receptor subunits NR1, NR2C, and NR3B. In summary, Cx36-GCaMP is an effective tool to measure changes in the Ca2+ microenvironment around Cx36 gap junctions. Furthermore, HeLa cells can serve as a model system to study glutamate receptor-driven potentiation of electrical synapses.Entities:
Keywords: Connexin 36; calcium signaling; electrical synapse; optical imaging; plasticity; tracer coupling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32179580 PMCID: PMC7168262 DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0445-19.2020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: eNeuro ISSN: 2373-2822
Primers used for cloning
| Name | Sequence | Template |
|---|---|---|
| Cx36-EGFP and GCaMP cloning | ||
| T7 extended |
| MsCx36 cDNA |
| JOB 284 |
| MsCx36 cDNA |
| JOB 285 |
| MsCx36 cDNA |
| PB513B-1 modification | ||
| KBM 1 | AATTAATGACCTGCAGGTCGACGACTGCATAGGGTTAC | pIRES DsRedT3-KR24 |
| KBM 2 | GCCGGGATTCTCCTCCACGATCCATTATCATCGTGTTTTTCAA | pIRES DsRedT3-KR24 |
| KBM 3 |
| PB513B-1 |
| KBM 4 | TGCAGGTCATTAATTAAGGTGGCGTCTAGCGTAGGCG | PB513B-1 |
| Cx36-GCaMP – NR1 dual vector cloning | ||
| KBM 7 |
| Cx36-GCaMP |
| KBM 8 |
| Cx36-GCaMP |
| KBM 405 |
| NR1 |
| KBM 406 |
| NR1 |
| NR2 cloning | ||
| KBM 11 |
| NR2C |
| KBM 12 |
| NR2C |
| KBM 13 |
| NR2A |
| KBM 14 |
| NR2A |
| KBM 15 |
| NR2B |
| KBM 16 |
| NR2B |
Figure 1.Properties of Cx36-GCaMP. , Intrinsic fluorescence of Cx36-GCaMP expressed in HEK293 cells. Cx36-GCaMP assembles into gap junctions at cell-cell boundaries. , Tracer coupling measurements of Cx36-GCaMP expressed in HeLa cells. , Neurobiotin loading and diffusion from the scraped edge in cells in control conditions (Con) or treated with 10 μM PKA inhibitor (Rp) or 10 μM PKA activator (Sp). , Fits of linear compartmental diffusion model to Cy-3 streptavidin fluorescent labeling of Neurobiotin tracer for each of the images shown. Diffusion coefficient k determined from the fit, in cells2/s, is shown on each graph. , Mean (bars) diffusion coefficients (k) for Neurobiotin tracer coupling in HeLa cells transfected with EGFP, Cx36-EGFP, or Cx36-GCaMP. All data are shown for six (EGFP, Cx36-GCaMP) or three (Cx36-EGFP) experiments. Error bars show 95% confidence limits of the mean; ****p < 0.0001 versus control.
Statistical outcomes
| Test/comparison | Multiple comparison/effect size | 95% CI of effect size | n1 | exps 1 | n2 | exps 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Two-way ANOVA | Tukey | ||||||
| EGFP Rp vs Con | 5.690 e-005 | 0.0002499 to –0.0001361 | 0.7662 | 29 | 6 | 29 | 6 |
| EGFP Sp vs Con | –1.034 e-005 | 0.0001827 to –0.0002033 | 0.9912 | 29 | 6 | 29 | 6 |
| Cx36-EGFP Rp vs Con | 0.0007820 | 0.001050 to 0.0005136 | <0.0001 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| Cx36-EGFP Sp vs Con | –9.667e-005 | 0.0001717 to –0.0003650 | 0.6722 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Rp vs Con | 0.0009282 | 0.001120 to 0.0007368 | <0.0001 | 29 | 6 | 30 | 6 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Sp vs Con | 0.0001067 | 0.0002964 to –8.309e-005 | 0.3819 | 30 | 6 | 30 | 6 |
| Two-way ANOVA | Dunnett | ||||||
| Cx36-EGFP vs EGFP Con | 6.494e-005 | 0.0002863 to –0.0001564 | 0.7451 | 15 | 3 | 29 | 6 |
| Cx36-GCaMP vs EGFP Con | 0.0002149 | 0.0003962 to 3.368e-005 | 0.0167 | 30 | 6 | 29 | 6 |
| Cx36-EGFP vs EGFP Rp | 0.0007900 | 0.001011 to 0.0005686 | <0.0001 | 15 | 3 | 29 | 6 |
| Cx36-GCaMP vs EGFP Rp | 0.001086 | 0.001269 to 0.0009034 | <0.0001 | 29 | 6 | 29 | 6 |
| Cx36-EGFP vs EGFP Sp | –2.138e-005 | 0.0002000 to –0.0002428 | 0.9680 | 15 | 3 | 29 | 6 |
| Cx36-GCaMP vs EGFP Sp | 0.0003320 | 0.0005132 to 0.0001507 | 0.0001 | 30 | 6 | 29 | 6 |
|
| |||||||
| Two-way ANOVA | Tukey | ||||||
| EGFP 100 Glu vs Con | 0.0001200 | 0.0008372 to –0.0005972 | 0.9996 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP 100 Glu vs Con | 0.001400 | 0.002117 to 0.0006828 | <0.0001 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| Cx36, NR1 100 Glu vs Con | 0.0008867 | 0.001604 to 0.0001695 | 0.0052 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| Cx36, NR1, NR2A 100 Glu vs Con | 0.001527 | 0.002244 to 0.0008095 | <0.0001 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| 100 Glu Cx36-GCaMP vs EGFP | 0.001337 | 0.002054 to 0.0006195 | <0.0001 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| 100 Glu Cx36, NR1 vs EGFP | 0.0007433 | 0.001461 to 2.617e-005 | 0.0365 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| 100 Glu Cx36, NR1, NR2A vs EGFP | 0.001443 | 0.002161 to 0.0007262 | <0.0001 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| 100 Glu Cx36-GCaMP vs Cx36, NR1 | 0.0005933 | –0.0001238 to 0.001311 | 0.1837 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| 100 Glu Cx36-GCaMP vs Cx36, NR1, NR2A | –0.0001067 | –0.0008238 to 0.0006105 | 0.9998 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
| 100 Glu Cx36, NR1 vs Cx36, NR1, NR2A | –0.0007000 | –0.001417 to 1.717e-005 | 0.0610 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
|
| |||||||
| One-way ANOVA | Tukey | ||||||
| Glu vs Con | 0.001032 | 0.001242 to 0.0008212 | <0.0001 | 42 | 6 | 37 | 6 |
| Glu+ACET vs Con | –3.643e-006 | 0.0002442 to –0.0002515 | >0.9999 | 23 | 3 | 37 | 6 |
| Glu+CNQX vs Con | 0.0002729 | 0.0005364 to 9.411e-006 | 0.0377 | 19 | 3 | 37 | 6 |
| Glu+GYKI vs Con | 0.0002369 | 0.0005227 to –4.882e-005 | 0.1651 | 15 | 3 | 37 | 6 |
| Glu+CPP vs Con | –6.046e-006 | 0.0002574 to –0.0002695 | >0.9999 | 19 | 3 | 37 | 6 |
| Glu+ACET vs Glu | –0.001035 | –0.0007932 to –0.001278 | <0.0001 | 23 | 3 | 42 | 6 |
| Glu+CNQX vs Glu | –0.0007588 | –0.0005007 to –0.001017 | <0.0001 | 19 | 3 | 42 | 6 |
| Glu+GYKI vs Glu | –0.0007948 | –0.0005139 to –0.001076 | <0.0001 | 15 | 3 | 42 | 6 |
| Glu+CPP vs Glu | –0.001038 | –0.0007796 to –0.001296 | <0.0001 | 19 | 3 | 42 | 6 |
|
| |||||||
| Two-way ANOVA | Tukey | ||||||
| EGFP Rp vs Con | –5.000e-005 | 0.0003220 to –0.0004220 | 0.9960 | 18 | 3 | 18 | 3 |
| EGFP Rp+KN93 vs Con | –1.944e-005 | 0.0003526 to –0.0003914 | >0.9999 | 18 | 3 | 18 | 3 |
| EGFP Glu vs Con | 5.408e-005 | 0.0004315 to –0.0003233 | 0.9948 | 17 | 3 | 18 | 3 |
| EGFP Glu+KN93 vs Con | 7.173e-005 | 0.0004492 to –0.0003057 | 0.9848 | 17 | 3 | 18 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Rp vs Con | 0.001030 | 0.001390 to 0.0006693 | <0.0001 | 22 | 3 | 17 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Rp+KN93 vs Con | 0.001068 | 0.001441 to 0.0006954 | <0.0001 | 19 | 3 | 17 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Glu vs Con | 0.001686 | 0.002054 to 0.001317 | <0.0001 | 20 | 3 | 17 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Glu+KN93 vs Con | 0.0004001 | 0.0007605 to 3.976e-005 | 0.0213 | 22 | 3 | 17 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Rp+KN93 vs Rp | 3.828e-005 | 0.0003878 to –0.0003112 | 0.9982 | 19 | 3 | 22 | 3 |
| Cx36-GCaMP Glu+KN93 vs Glu | –0.001285 | –0.0009407 to –0.001630 | <0.0001 | 22 | 3 | 20 | 3 |
Figure 2.Calcium responses of Cx36-GCaMP. , Fluorescence response to application of 5 μM ionomycin for 40 s (black bar). Data shown are means of 15 gap junctions in three experiments ± 95% confidence limits of the mean. Note that one of three experiments ended at 92 s, so the final 28 s show 10 gap junctions. , Fluorescence response to application of 100 nM thapsigargin (gray bar). Data shown are means of five gap junctions in one experiment ± 95% confidence limits of the mean. , Fluorescence response to application of 5 μM ionomycin (black bar) in the presence of 100 nM thapsigargin. Shown are means of 15 gap junctions in three experiments ± 95% confidence limits of the mean. The mean response to ionomycin in control conditions is shown by the black line for reference. , Fluorescence response to application of 5 μM ionomycin (black bar) in the presence of 200 nM SEA 0400. Shown are means of 14 gap junctions in three experiments ± 95% confidence limits of the mean. The mean response to ionomycin in control conditions is shown by the black line for reference.
Figure 3.Immunofluorescence labeling of Cx36-GCaMP and NMDA receptors transfected into HEK293 cells. For each transfection combination, Cx36-GCaMP is shown in green, NR1 in red, and NR2x in blue. , Cx36-GCaMP + NR1. , Cx36-GCaMP + NR1 + NR2A. , Cx36-GCaMP + NR1 + NR2B. , Cx36-GCaMP + NR1 + NR2C. Well-formed gap junctions at cell-cell boundaries were used for live imaging experiments, while overexpressing cells with diffusely distributed Cx36-GCaMP were avoided.
Figure 4.Cx36-GCaMP gap junction responses to glutamate application. Shown in are representative single gap junction raw fluorescence responses to bath application of 100 μM glutamate (black bar) in HEK293 cells expressing NMDA receptors containing NR1 and NR2A (), NR2B (), or NR2C (). Baseline subtracted average responses to 30 μM (dashed lines) and 100 μM (solid lines) glutamate are shown below in . , 30 μM NR2A, average of eight gap junctions from two experiments; 100 μM NR2A, average of five gap junctions from one experiment. , 30 μM NR2B, average of seven gap junctions from two experiments; 100 μM NR2B, average of four gap junctions from one experiment. , 30 μM NR2C, average of six gap junctions from two experiments; 100 μM NR2C, average of 11 gap junctions from three experiments.
Figure 5.Glutamate concentration-response relationships of Cx36-GCaMP gap junctions in HEK293 cells expressing NR2A-containing and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors. , , Baseline-subtracted fluorescence peak response for NR2A () and NR2B-containing () cells. , , Integrated area under the response curve for NR2A () and NR2B-containing () cells. All data are shown for 8–25 gap junctions from two to eight experiments per condition. The black lines connect the mean responses.
Figure 6.Effects of glutamate application on tracer coupling in HeLa cells expressing EGFP or Cx36-GCaMP with or without added NMDA receptor subunits. The diffusion coefficient (k) for Neurobiotin tracer diffusion is shown for 5-min preincubation plus 10-min tracer diffusion time in control media (Con) or control media plus 100 μM glutamate (100 Glu). All data are shown from three experiments; bars show mean values; error bars show 95% confidence limits of the mean; **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001 versus same transfection composition in control media.
Figure 7.Pharmacological characteristics of endogenous glutamate receptors in HeLa cells expressing Cx36-GCaMP. The diffusion coefficient (k) for Neurobiotin tracer diffusion is shown for 5-min preincubation plus 10-min tracer diffusion time in control media (Con), control media plus 100 μM glutamate (Glu), or control media plus 100 μM glutamate plus 100 nM ACET (Glu+ACET), 10 μM CNQX (Glu+CNQX), 40 μM GYKI 53 655 (Glu+GYKI), or 10 μM CPP (Glu+CPP). All data are shown from six (Con, Glu) or three experiments; bars show mean values; error bars show 95% confidence limits of the mean; *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001 versus control condition; comparison of each drug versus 100 μM Glu, shown by the bracket, yielded p < 0.0001 for all.
HeLa gene expression analysis
| Glutamate receptor genes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Raw count | Normalized read count | |
| Grik1-As2 | GRIK1 antisense RNA 2 | 1 | 0.033173785 |
| Grin1 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 1 | 1.531111111 | 0.050792751 |
| Grin2c | Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2C | 1 | 0.033173785 |
| Grin3b | Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3B | 1.363636364 | 0.04523698 |
| Grm1 | Glutamate metabotropic receptor 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm2 | Glutamate metabotropic receptor 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm3 | Glutamate metabotropic receptor 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm4 | Glutamate metabotropic receptor 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm5 | Glutamate metabotropic receptor 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm5-As1 | GRM5 antisense RNA 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm6 | Glutamate metabotropic receptor 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm7 | glutamate metabotropic receptor 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm7-As1 | GRM7 antisense RNA 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm7-As2 | GRM7 antisense RNA 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm7-As3 | GRM7 antisense RNA 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Grm8 | Glutamate metabotropic receptor 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Grik1 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grik1-As1 | GRIK1 antisense RNA 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grik2 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Grik3 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Grik4 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Grik5 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor kainate type subunit 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Gria1 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Gria2 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Gria3 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Gria4 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Grid1 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor delta type subunit 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grid1-As1 | GRID1 antisense RNA 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grid2 | Glutamate ionotropic receptor delta type subunit 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Grin2a | Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2A | 0 | 0 |
| Grin2b | Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2B | 0 | 0 |
| Grin2d | Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2D | 0 | 0 |
| Grin3a | Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 3A | 0 | 0 |
| Connexin genes | |||
| Gene | Raw count | Normalized read count | |
| GJA1 | Gap junction protein alpha 1 (Cx43) | 14.45 | 0.479361193 |
| GJA9-MYCBP | GJA9 (Cx59)-MYCBP readthrough transcript | 16.58024691 | 0.550029546 |
| GJB3 | Gap junction protein beta 3 (Cx31) | 1.123076923 | 0.037256712 |
| GJC1 | Gap junction protein gamma 1 (Cx45) | 5.186435986 | 0.172053712 |
| GJC2 | Gap junction protein gamma 2 (Cx47) | 2.0465 | 0.067890151 |
| GJD3 | Gap junction protein delta 3 (Cx31.9) | 2.713594595 | 0.090020204 |
| GJA3 | Gap junction protein alpha 3 (Cx46) | 0 | 0 |
| GJA4 | Gap junction protein alpha 4 (Cx37) | 0 | 0 |
| GJA5 | Gap junction protein alpha 5 (Cx40) | 0 | 0 |
| GJA8 | Gap junction protein alpha 8 (Cx50) | 0 | 0 |
| GJA10 | Gap junction protein alpha 10 (Cx62) | 0 | 0 |
| GJB1 | Gap junction protein beta 1 (Cx32) | 0 | 0 |
| GJB2 | Gap junction protein beta 2 (Cx26) | 0 | 0 |
| GJB4 | Gap junction protein beta 4 (Cx30.3) | 0 | 0 |
| GJB5 | Gap junction protein beta 5 (Cx31.1) | 0 | 0 |
| GJB6 | Gap junction protein beta 6 (Cx30) | 0 | 0 |
| GJB7 | Gap junction protein beta 7 (Cx25) | 0 | 0 |
| GJC3 | Gap junction protein gamma 3 (Cx29) | 0 | 0 |
| GJD2 | Gap junction protein delta 2 (Cx36) | 0 | 0 |
| GJD4 | Gap junction protein delta 4 (Cx40.1) | 0 | 0 |
Figure 8.Protein kinase signaling pathways responsible for potentiation of Cx36-GCaMP tracer coupling by 100 μM glutamate in HeLa cells. The diffusion coefficient (k) for Neurobiotin tracer diffusion is shown using the same experimental paradigm as in Fig. 6. Rp = PKA inhibitor (10 μM); KN-93 = CaMKII inhibitor (10 μM); Glu = 100 μM glutamate. All data are shown from three experiments; bars show mean values; error bars show 95% confidence limits of the mean; *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001; ns = not significant. Symbols above bars represent comparison versus same transfected construct in control media; symbols above brackets represent comparison of the conditions underlying the ends of the brackets.