Literature DB >> 32179192

The Historical Evolution of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.

Anika Sonig1, Fareed Jumah2, Bharath Raju2, Nitesh V Patel2, Gaurav Gupta2, Anil Nanda3.   

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has become an important tool in neurocritical care. Despite being used in intensive care units all over the world, many are unfamiliar with its origins and the people and events that shaped the development of this technique. Herein, we provide a comprehensive historical review of the evolution of ICP monitoring, beginning with the earliest descriptions of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We conducted a database search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Google Books for relevant articles using the key words "cerebrospinal fluid," "intracranial pressure," and "monitoring." Papers were further snowballed using reference lists of relevant papers. Although the earliest descriptions of CSF date back several hundred years bce, the history of ICP monitoring itself is not a long one. Alexander Monro and his student George Kellie laid the foundation of CSF physiology in the early 1800s through the Monro-Kellie doctrine. Their principles were later consolidated by John Abercrombie and Harvey Cushing. However, 10 years earlier than Cushing's work on CSF physiology, Hans Queckenstedt's utilization of a lumbar needle to measure the pressure in CSF marked the beginning of the era of ICP monitoring. Thenceforward, ICP monitoring technology underwent progressive improvements through the contributions of French scientists Jean Guillaume and Pierre Janny, Swedish neurosurgeon Nils Lundberg, among others. Nowadays, ICP monitoring can be performed via direct and indirect methods using a potpourri of devices such as, but not limited to, subarachnoid bolts, microtransducer catheters, and telemetric monitors. Nevertheless, despite advancements in ICP monitoring technology, the criterion standard remains an extraventricular drain catheter connected to an external pressure transducer.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  History; Intracranial pressure; Monitoring; Neurocritical care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32179192     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.210


  7 in total

1.  Worth Their Salt: One Hundred Years of Hyperosmolar Therapy.

Authors:  Bart Lutters; Peter J Koehler; Eelco F Wijdicks
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Effect of dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position through ultrasonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter.

Authors:  Ting Zhu; Chen Yuan; Meijuan Qian; Lihong Zhao; Hui Li; Yang Xie
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Cerebral Ultrasound Time-Harmonic Elastography Reveals Softening of the Human Brain Due to Dehydration.

Authors:  Bernhard Kreft; Judith Bergs; Mehrgan Shahryari; Leon Alexander Danyel; Stefan Hetzer; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack; Heiko Tzschätzsch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  Raman Spectroscopy as a Neuromonitoring Tool in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew R Stevens; Clarissa A Stickland; Georgia Harris; Zubair Ahmed; Pola Goldberg Oppenheimer; Antonio Belli; David J Davies
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  A machine learning approach in the non-invasive prediction of intracranial pressure using Modified Photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Anmar Abdul-Rahman; William Morgan; Dao-Yi Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  The historic evolution of intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure concepts: Two centuries of challenges.

Authors:  Nicollas Nunes Rabelo; Josué da Silva Brito; Jassiara Soares da Silva; Nicolli Bellotti de Souza; Giselle Coelho; Sérgio Brasil; Gustavo Frigieri
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-14

7.  Waveform Morphology as a Surrogate for ICP Monitoring: A Comparison Between an Invasive and a Noninvasive Method.

Authors:  Fabiano Moulin de Moraes; Eva Rocha; Felipe Chaves Duarte Barros; Flávio Geraldo Rezende Freitas; Maramelia Miranda; Raul Alberto Valiente; João Brainer Clares de Andrade; Feres Eduardo Aparecido Chaddad Neto; Gisele Sampaio Silva
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.532

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.