Christy J W Ledford1, Carla L Fisher2, Lauren A Cafferty3, Jeremy T Jackson4, Paul F Crawford5, Dean A Seehusen6. 1. Military Primary Care Research Network, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. University of Florida, College of Journalism and Communications, P.O. Box 118400, Gainesville, FL, USA. 3. Henry M. Jackson Foundation, 6720A Rockledge Dr. Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation, 6720A Rockledge Dr. Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Henry M. Jackson Foundation, 6720A Rockledge Dr. Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation, 6720A Rockledge Dr. Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: jtjackson@hjf.org. 5. Henry M. Jackson Foundation, 6720A Rockledge Dr. Bethesda, MD, USA; Nellis Family Medicine Residency, 4700 Las Vegas Boulevard North, Las Vegas, NV, USA. 6. Augusta University, Department of Family Medicine, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To identify communication cycles patients use to make sense of a diabetes diagnosis and barriers patients encounter in their sensemaking process. METHODS: Researchers conducted interviews with 33 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes at medical centers in Georgia and Nevada. A thematic analysis using the constant comparative method identified communication cycles. RESULTS: Patients reported engaging three communication cycles to make sense of the diagnosis: (1) interacting with healthcare clinicians; (2) seeking information online; and (3) taking a nutrition/diabetes management class. Patients reported system-level barriers that impact sensemaking: (1) lack of consistent or routine care; and (2) lack of access to resources. CONCLUSION: Results here reinforce the theoretical proposition that receiving a diagnosis is an equivocal process that requires patients to make sense of new information through communication cycles. Patients in this sample repeatedly described communication cycles to interpret this new information rather than relying on assembly rules. Clinicians can promote patient understanding of diabetes and self-management by taking time to explain the diagnosis, maintaining consistent care, providing guidance to online sources, and ensuring patients have access to diabetes education. Published by Elsevier B.V.
AIMS: To identify communication cycles patients use to make sense of a diabetes diagnosis and barriers patients encounter in their sensemaking process. METHODS: Researchers conducted interviews with 33 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes at medical centers in Georgia and Nevada. A thematic analysis using the constant comparative method identified communication cycles. RESULTS:Patients reported engaging three communication cycles to make sense of the diagnosis: (1) interacting with healthcare clinicians; (2) seeking information online; and (3) taking a nutrition/diabetes management class. Patients reported system-level barriers that impact sensemaking: (1) lack of consistent or routine care; and (2) lack of access to resources. CONCLUSION: Results here reinforce the theoretical proposition that receiving a diagnosis is an equivocal process that requires patients to make sense of new information through communication cycles. Patients in this sample repeatedly described communication cycles to interpret this new information rather than relying on assembly rules. Clinicians can promote patient understanding of diabetes and self-management by taking time to explain the diagnosis, maintaining consistent care, providing guidance to online sources, and ensuring patients have access to diabetes education. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnosis delivery; Patient communication; Prediabetes; Type 2 diabetes mellitus