| Literature DB >> 32178686 |
Yang Zhou1,2,3, Yuanzhi Guo4,5, Yansui Liu4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the health status of the poor households and the influence of unhealthy on their income can provide some vital insights into the effectiveness and appropriateness of poverty reduction solutions.Entities:
Keywords: Health intervention; Health status; Poor households; Poverty alleviation; Rural China
Year: 2020 PMID: 32178686 PMCID: PMC7076955 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-1121-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Fig. 1The nexus between poverty and health
Variables and data sources involved in this study
| Variable | Definition | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Poor households | The households with relatively difficult life. Their per capita net income is lower than the national poverty alleviation standard, and there are difficulties in eating and dressing, or their housing safety, basic medical care and compulsory education are not guaranteed. | Field investigation |
| Causes of poverty | The causes of farmers’ poverty | Field investigation |
| The total income of rural households from various sources in the current year after deducting the expenses incurred | Field investigation | |
| Number of family members aged 60 and over | Field investigation | |
| The number of people who have the ability to work from 16 to 60 years old | Field investigation | |
| The number of disabled family members | Field investigation | |
| The number of chronic patients in family members | Field investigation | |
| The number of patients with infectious diseases in family members | Field investigation | |
| The elevation of the residence of the farmer’s house | Field investigation |
Fig. 2Causes of poverty for the interviewed households
Fig. 3Health status of the surveyed household members (Notes: In unhealthy families, a family may have both chronic or infectious patients and disabled people, so the proportion in the right figure is more than 100%.)
Fig. 4Types of NCDs
Descriptive statistics
| Variable | Average value | Standard deviation | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5870.71 | 5721.70 | 29,712 | |
| 0.79 | 0.82 | 29,712 | |
| 0.55 | 0.78 | 29,712 | |
| 0.25 | 0.49 | 29,712 | |
| 0.75 | 0.91 | 29,712 | |
| 0.02 | 0.15 | 29,712 | |
| 830.15 | 888.17 | 29,712 |
Notes: Per GDP is per capita GDP; AGE60 is the number of household members aged 60 and over; WCP is the number of household members with working capacity; ND, N_NCDs and N_CDs are the number of households affected by disability, NCDs and CDs respectively; and Elv is the elevation of the interviewed households’ residence
Partial correlation analysis results
| Control variable | Variable | Elv | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | 1 | − 0.12*** | 0.20*** | −0.05*** | − 0.12*** | − 0.02*** | − 0.02*** | |
| −0.10*** | 1 | −0.09*** | 0.05*** | 0.25*** | 0.001 | −0.14*** | ||
| 0.20*** | −0.10*** | 1 | −0.07*** | − 0.07 | − 0.04*** | 0.09*** | ||
| −0.05*** | 0.05*** | −0.07*** | 1 | −0.14*** | − 0.03*** | − 0.05*** | ||
| − 0.12*** | 0.25*** | − 0.07*** | − 0.14*** | 1 | − 0.02*** | − 0.14*** | ||
| −0.02*** | 0.001 | −0.04 | − 0.03*** | − 0.02*** | 1 | − 0.01* | ||
| −0.02*** | − 0.14*** | 0.09*** | − 0.05*** | − 0.14*** | − 0.010* | 1 | ||
| Elv | 1 | −0.10*** | 0.20*** | −0.05*** | −0.15*** | − 0.02*** | ||
| −0.10*** | 1 | −0.08*** | 0.04*** | 0.24*** | 0 | |||
| 0.20*** | −0.08*** | 1 | −0.07*** | −0.06*** | − 0.003 | |||
| −0.05*** | 0.04*** | −0.07*** | 1 | −0.15*** | −0.03*** | |||
| −0.12*** | 0.24*** | −0.06*** | −0.15*** | 1 | −0.02*** | |||
| −0.02*** | 0 | 0 | −0.03*** | −0.02*** | 1 |
Notes: Per GDP is per capita GDP; AGE60 is the number of household members aged 60 and over; WCP is the number of household members with working capacity; ND, N_NCDs and N_CDs are the number of households affected by disability, NCDs and CDs respectively; and Elv is the elevation of the interviewed households’ residence. The sample size is 29,712. * Indicate statistical significance at the 10% level. *** Indicate statistical significance at the 1% level
Summary statistics for the regression models between health, per capita income and geographical location
| Variable | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity Statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | |||
| (Constant) | 6167 | 69.96 | 88.15 | 0.000 | |||
| −0.120 | 0.037 | − 0.019 | −3.234 | 0.001 | 0.960 | 1.041 | |
| − 419.855 | 40.930 | −0.060 | −10.258 | 0.000 | 0.914 | 1.094 | |
| 1386.370 | 41.950 | 0.188 | 33.048 | 0.000 | 0.979 | 1.021 | |
| − 569.758 | 67.053 | −0.049 | −8/497 | 0.000 | 0.963 | 1.038 | |
| − 615.258 | 37.472 | −0.098 | −16.419 | 0.000 | 0.897 | 1.115 | |
| − 854.289 | 213.857 | −0.023 | −3.995 | 0.000 | 0.998 | 1.002 | |
| Adjusted | 0.058 | ||||||
| F( | 305.598 (0.00) | ||||||
Notes: Dependent variable: Per_GDP; Independent variable: Elv, AGE60, WCP, ND N_NCDs, N_CDs. Per_GDP is per capita GDP; Elv is the elevation of the interviewed households; AGE60 is the number of household members aged 60 and over; WCP is the number of household members with working capacity; ND, N_NCDs and N_CDs are the number of households affected by disability, NCDs and CDs, respectively. The sample size is 29,712