Nicola Maffulli1,2,3, Alessio D'Addona4, Gayle D Maffulli5, Nikolaos Gougoulias6,7, Francesco Oliva1. 1. Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy. 2. Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK. 3. School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Faculty of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK. 4. Department of Public Health, Section of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery "Federico II," Naples, Italy. 5. Wholelife Clinics, London, UK. 6. Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, UK. 7. Foot Surgery Private Practice, Thessaloniki and Athens, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures has been performed for several years, resulting in reduced morbidity as compared with open repair. HYPOTHESIS: A minimally invasive technique can be used to manage Achilles tendon ruptures in patients presenting between 14 and 30 days from injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 21 consecutive patients who presented between 14 and 30 days after the index injury, and we compared them with 21 patients who were matched according to sex, age (±2 years), and level of activity, who presented within 14 days of the index injury. All patients underwent the same minimally invasive procedure under local anesthesia: a core suture repair consisting of a modified Bunnell suture in the proximal stump and a modified Kessler suture in the distal stump. RESULTS: At 12 months after minimally invasive repair, patients with delayed treatment had a median Achilles tendon rupture score of 91 (SD, 2.4; range, 87-96) as compared with 91 (SD, 2.2; range, 86-96) in patients treated acutely, who presented at a median 2.4 days (range 1-6 days) from the injury. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of mean (SD) Achilles tendon resting angle: delayed repair group, -3.9° (2.0); acute repair group, -3.7° (1.9) (P = .69). No patient in either group developed a wound infection. One patient in the acute group experienced an iatrogenic sural nerve injury. CONCLUSION: Patients with Achilles tendon rupture treated by percutaneous repair 14 to 30 days after injury achieved similar results at 1 year as patient treated <14 after injury.
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures has been performed for several years, resulting in reduced morbidity as compared with open repair. HYPOTHESIS: A minimally invasive technique can be used to manage Achilles tendon ruptures in patients presenting between 14 and 30 days from injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 21 consecutive patients who presented between 14 and 30 days after the index injury, and we compared them with 21 patients who were matched according to sex, age (±2 years), and level of activity, who presented within 14 days of the index injury. All patients underwent the same minimally invasive procedure under local anesthesia: a core suture repair consisting of a modified Bunnell suture in the proximal stump and a modified Kessler suture in the distal stump. RESULTS: At 12 months after minimally invasive repair, patients with delayed treatment had a median Achilles tendon rupture score of 91 (SD, 2.4; range, 87-96) as compared with 91 (SD, 2.2; range, 86-96) in patients treated acutely, who presented at a median 2.4 days (range 1-6 days) from the injury. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of mean (SD) Achilles tendon resting angle: delayed repair group, -3.9° (2.0); acute repair group, -3.7° (1.9) (P = .69). No patient in either group developed a wound infection. One patient in the acute group experienced an iatrogenic sural nerve injury. CONCLUSION:Patients with Achilles tendon rupture treated by percutaneous repair 14 to 30 days after injury achieved similar results at 1 year as patient treated <14 after injury.
Authors: Francesco Oliva; Emanuela Marsilio; Giovanni Asparago; Alessio Giai Via; Carlo Biz; Johnny Padulo; Marco Spoliti; Calogero Foti; Gabriella Oliva; Stefania Mannarini; Alessandro Alberto Rossi; Pietro Ruggieri; Nicola Maffulli Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.964