Purpose: To study the levels of complement activation in different disease stages of AMD and the influence of genetic polymorphisms in complement genes. Methods: We included 797 patients with AMD and 945 controls from the European Genetic Database. Patients were grouped into five AMD stages: early AMD, intermediate AMD, central geographic atrophy, active choroidal neovascularization or inactive choroidal neovascularization. Differences in complement activation, as defined by the systemic C3d/C3 ratio, between AMD stages were evaluated using general linear modeling. In addition, we evaluated the influence of 18 genetic AMD polymorphisms in complement genes and their effect on complement activation. Differences in complement activation between stages were evaluated stratifying by complement associated haplotypes. Results: Complement activation levels differed significantly between AMD disease stages. As compared with controls, the C3d/C3 ratio was higher in patients with intermediate AMD (P < 0.001) and central geographic atrophy (P = 0.001). Two polymorphisms in CFH (rs10922109 and rs570618) and one in CFB (rs116503776) were significantly associated with complement activation. The association between AMD disease stage and complement activation was more pronounced in patients with haplotypes associated with the highest complement activation. Conclusions: In general, consecutive AMD disease stages showed increasing levels of complement activation, especially in individuals with a genetic burden in complement genes. These findings contribute to the discussion on the pathogenesis of AMD in relation to complement activation and might suggest refinement in patient selection and the optimum window of treatment with complement inhibitors. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
Purpose: To study the levels of complement activation in different disease stages of AMD and the influence of genetic polymorphisms in complement genes. Methods: We included 797 patients with AMD and 945 controls from the European Genetic Database. Patients were grouped into five AMD stages: early AMD, intermediate AMD, central geographic atrophy, active choroidal neovascularization or inactive choroidal neovascularization. Differences in complement activation, as defined by the systemic C3d/C3 ratio, between AMD stages were evaluated using general linear modeling. In addition, we evaluated the influence of 18 genetic AMD polymorphisms in complement genes and their effect on complement activation. Differences in complement activation between stages were evaluated stratifying by complement associated haplotypes. Results: Complement activation levels differed significantly between AMD disease stages. As compared with controls, the C3d/C3 ratio was higher in patients with intermediate AMD (P < 0.001) and central geographic atrophy (P = 0.001). Two polymorphisms in CFH (rs10922109 and rs570618) and one in CFB (rs116503776) were significantly associated with complement activation. The association between AMD disease stage and complement activation was more pronounced in patients with haplotypes associated with the highest complement activation. Conclusions: In general, consecutive AMD disease stages showed increasing levels of complement activation, especially in individuals with a genetic burden in complement genes. These findings contribute to the discussion on the pathogenesis of AMD in relation to complement activation and might suggest refinement in patient selection and the optimum window of treatment with complement inhibitors. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.
Authors: Adnan H Khan; Charles O Pierce; Gabriella De Salvo; Helen Griffiths; Marie Nelson; Angela J Cree; Geeta Menon; Andrew J Lotery Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Sarah de Jong; Anita de Breuk; Elena B Volokhina; Bjorn Bakker; Alejandro Garanto; Sascha Fauser; Suresh Katti; Carel B Hoyng; Yara T E Lechanteur; Lambert P van den Heuvel; Anneke I den Hollander Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Benjamin J Kim; Dimitrios C Mastellos; Yafeng Li; Joshua L Dunaief; John D Lambris Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2020-12-13 Impact factor: 19.704
Authors: Emilie Grarup Jensen; Thomas Stax Jakobsen; Steffen Thiel; Anne Louise Askou; Thomas J Corydon Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Patty P A Dhooge; Esmee H Runhart; Catherina H Z Li; Corrie M de Kat Angelino; Carel B Hoyng; Renate G van der Molen; Anneke I den Hollander Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thomas J Heesterbeek; Mansour Rouhi-Parkouhi; Stephanie J Church; Yara T Lechanteur; Laura Lorés-Motta; Nikolaos Kouvatsos; Simon J Clark; Paul N Bishop; Carel B Hoyng; Anneke I den Hollander; Richard D Unwin; Anthony J Day Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.467