Matthew E Levy1, Caleb Griffith2, Nicole Ellenberger3, Anne K Monroe1, Amanda D Castel1, Natella Rakhmanina2,4,5. 1. From the Department of Epidemiology, Milken Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University, Washington, DC. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC. 3. The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia. 4. Department of Pediatrics, the George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. 5. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Data on integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) use in children, adolescents and young adults with HIV are limited. We evaluated virologic and safety outcomes following INSTI initiation among treatment-experienced children, adolescents and young adults. METHODS: The DC Cohort is a multicenter observational study of individuals receiving HIV care in Washington, DC. This analysis included treatment-experienced participants 0-24 years of age who initiated an INSTI during 2011-2017. Viral suppression (VS) and safety outcomes were quantified. Differences in VS by age, sex and CD4 count were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Of 141 participants (median age 20 years; 35% <18 years; 60% male; 89% Black; 62% perinatally-infected), 35% had VS and 65% lacked VS on INSTI initiation. Dolutegravir was the most commonly prescribed INSTI (55%). Among participants without VS at INSTI initiation, 46% achieved VS after a median of 2.7 months. Participants 13-24 (vs. 0-12) years old (P = 0.011) and participants with CD4 counts <350 (vs. >500) cells/μL were less likely to achieve VS (P < 0.001). Among participants with VS at INSTI initiation, 51% sustained VS through a median of 11.0 months of follow-up; of the 49% with transient viremia, 77% later achieved VS again. There were no safety concerns associated with the use of INSTIs. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of treatment-experienced children, adolescents and young adults with detectable viremia at INSTI initiation did not achieve VS, while half of those with prior VS experienced transient viremia. Further evaluation of long-term outcomes associated with INSTI use among children, adolescents and young adults is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Data on integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) use in children, adolescents and young adults with HIV are limited. We evaluated virologic and safety outcomes following INSTI initiation among treatment-experienced children, adolescents and young adults. METHODS: The DC Cohort is a multicenter observational study of individuals receiving HIV care in Washington, DC. This analysis included treatment-experienced participants 0-24 years of age who initiated an INSTI during 2011-2017. Viral suppression (VS) and safety outcomes were quantified. Differences in VS by age, sex and CD4 count were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Of 141 participants (median age 20 years; 35% <18 years; 60% male; 89% Black; 62% perinatally-infected), 35% had VS and 65% lacked VS on INSTI initiation. Dolutegravir was the most commonly prescribed INSTI (55%). Among participants without VS at INSTI initiation, 46% achieved VS after a median of 2.7 months. Participants 13-24 (vs. 0-12) years old (P = 0.011) and participants with CD4 counts <350 (vs. >500) cells/μL were less likely to achieve VS (P < 0.001). Among participants with VS at INSTI initiation, 51% sustained VS through a median of 11.0 months of follow-up; of the 49% with transient viremia, 77% later achieved VS again. There were no safety concerns associated with the use of INSTIs. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of treatment-experienced children, adolescents and young adults with detectable viremia at INSTI initiation did not achieve VS, while half of those with prior VS experienced transient viremia. Further evaluation of long-term outcomes associated with INSTI use among children, adolescents and young adults is warranted.
Authors: Daniel da Silva; Liesbeth Van Wesenbeeck; Dominique Breilh; Sandrine Reigadas; Guerric Anies; Kurt Van Baelen; Philippe Morlat; Didier Neau; Michel Dupon; Linda Wittkop; Hervé Fleury; Bernard Masquelier Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-04-12 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Jeffrey L Lennox; Raphael J Landovitz; Heather J Ribaudo; Ighovwerha Ofotokun; Lumine H Na; Catherine Godfrey; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Manish Sagar; Todd T Brown; Susan E Cohn; Grace A McComsey; Francesca Aweeka; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Rachel M Presti; Susan L Koletar; David W Haas; Kristine B Patterson; Constance A Benson; Bryan P Baugh; Randi Y Leavitt; James F Rooney; Daniel Seekins; Judith S Currier Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Eva Natukunda; Aditya H Gaur; Pope Kosalaraksa; Jagmohan Batra; Natella Rakhmanina; Danielle Porter; Yongwu Shao; Heather Zhang; Cheryl Pikora; Martin S Rhee Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2017-06-29
Authors: Sharon Nachman; Carmelita Alvero; Edward P Acosta; Hedy Teppler; Brenda Homony; Bobbie Graham; Terence Fenton; Xia Xu; Matthew L Rizk; Stephen A Spector; Lisa M Frenkel; Carol Worrell; Edward Handelsman; Andrew Wiznia Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Mark A Winters; Robert M Lloyd; Robert W Shafer; Michael J Kozal; Michael D Miller; Mark Holodniy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 3.240