Wei-Hong Zheng1,2,3,4, Xiao-Jun He1,2,3,4, Fo-Ping Chen1,2,3,4, Li Lin1,2,3,4, Xiao-Dan Huang1,2,3,4, Hua-Qiang Zhou2,3,5, Jia Kou1,2,3,4, Jia-Wei Lv1,2,3,4, Jun Ma1,2,3,4, Guan-Qun Zhou1,2,3,4, Ying Sun1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, China. 3. Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. 4. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou 510060, China. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Significance of plasma Epstein-Barr virus deoxyribonucleic acid (EBV DNA)-a proven robust indicator for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)-is not yet clarified in risk stratification of metastatic NPC (mNPC). We aim to establish effective M1 stage subdivisions in mNPC by integrating radiological features and EBV DNA at diagnosis of metastasis (mEBV DNA). METHODS: The study comprised 1,007 mNPC patients, including 817 metachronous mNPC (mmNPC) patients randomized into training (n=613) and internal validation (n=204) cohorts, and 190 synchronous mNPC (smNPC) patients defined as smNPC validation cohort. Primary clinical end-point was overall survival (OS). Covariate inclusion to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)-generated risk stratification was qualified by a multivariable two-sided P<0.05. Performances of different models were compared using area under ROC curve (AUC), Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). RESULTS: Compared with other simply image-based models, the ultimate RPA-EBV-stage presented a best performance [c-index =0.68 (training), 0.70 (internal validation), 0.64 (smNPC validation); AUC =0.69 (training), 0.72 (internal validation), 0.70 (smNPC validation)]: M1a (low mEBV DNA + oligo lesion), M1b (low mEBV DNA + multiple lesions), M1c (high mEBV DNA + no liver involvement), and M1d (high mEBV DNA + liver involvement). Corresponding 3-year OS rates were 49.9%, 33.4%, 22.6%, and 6.7%, respectively (P<0.001). In mmNPC patients, compared with chemotherapy alone, addition of local treatment demonstrated superiority in M1a and M1b; systemic therapy combined with targeted therapy conferred benefit on patients of M1c and M1d (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This RPA-EBV-stage provided favorable prognostic value for survival outcomes and could assist clinical and investigative management. Low-risk patients are considered suitable candidate for curative local treatment, and high-risk patients are recommended to undergo intensive systemic treatment. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Significance of plasma Epstein-Barr virus deoxyribonucleic acid (EBV DNA)-a proven robust indicator for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)-is not yet clarified in risk stratification of metastatic NPC (mNPC). We aim to establish effective M1 stage subdivisions in mNPC by integrating radiological features and EBV DNA at diagnosis of metastasis (mEBV DNA). METHODS: The study comprised 1,007 mNPC patients, including 817 metachronous mNPC (mmNPC) patients randomized into training (n=613) and internal validation (n=204) cohorts, and 190 synchronous mNPC (smNPC) patients defined as smNPC validation cohort. Primary clinical end-point was overall survival (OS). Covariate inclusion to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)-generated risk stratification was qualified by a multivariable two-sided P<0.05. Performances of different models were compared using area under ROC curve (AUC), Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC). RESULTS: Compared with other simply image-based models, the ultimate RPA-EBV-stage presented a best performance [c-index =0.68 (training), 0.70 (internal validation), 0.64 (smNPC validation); AUC =0.69 (training), 0.72 (internal validation), 0.70 (smNPC validation)]: M1a (low mEBV DNA + oligo lesion), M1b (low mEBV DNA + multiple lesions), M1c (high mEBV DNA + no liver involvement), and M1d (high mEBV DNA + liver involvement). Corresponding 3-year OS rates were 49.9%, 33.4%, 22.6%, and 6.7%, respectively (P<0.001). In mmNPC patients, compared with chemotherapy alone, addition of local treatment demonstrated superiority in M1a and M1b; systemic therapy combined with targeted therapy conferred benefit on patients of M1c and M1d (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This RPA-EBV-stage provided favorable prognostic value for survival outcomes and could assist clinical and investigative management. Low-risk patients are considered suitable candidate for curative local treatment, and high-risk patients are recommended to undergo intensive systemic treatment. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Authors: Edwin P Hui; Sing F Leung; Joseph S K Au; Benny Zee; Stewart Tung; Daniel Chua; Wai M Sze; Chun K Law; To W Leung; Anthony T C Chan Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162