| Literature DB >> 32174894 |
Corinna Westphal1, Dennis Görlich2, Stefanie Kampmeier3, Susann Herzog1, Nadja Braun1, Carina Hitschke1, Alexander Mellmann3, Georg Peters1, Barbara C Kahl1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most isolated pathogens from the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. There is a lack of information about the clonal nature of S. aureus cultured from CF patients and their impact on disease. We hypothesized that patients would differ in their clinical status depending on S. aureus clonal carriage profiles during persistence.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; airway infection; clonal lineages; cystic fibrosis; persistent infection; spa-typing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32174894 PMCID: PMC7055462 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Population structure according to spa clonal complexes (CC) of S. aureus CF isolates. This figure demonstrates the clonal relatedness of all 265 spa-types of the 3893 S. aureus study across the 17 participating centers consisting of 16 German and 1 Austrian center. The analysis of the relationship of spa-types was performed based on the BURP algorithm as implemented in the Ridom StaphType software. 192 of the spa-types could be assigned to 12 CC: CC015, CC02, CC05, CC08, CC084, CC166, CC189, CC1245/5761, CC159/284/435, CC359, CC078, and CC156. The main founder spa-type is shown in blue in the middle of each CC, the sub founder marked in yellow, which leads to the following branch. All descendant spa-types are grouped around their respective founder. The size of each circle demonstrates the number of S. aureus isolates with the respective spa-type. For 19 spa-types, the BURP algorithm could determine no founder spa-type and therefore no clonal complex. These spa-types are presented as “no founder” and appear at the bottom of the figure. Thirty-six spa-types could not be related to other spa-types in our study. Therefore, BURP assigned them as singletons (dots not shown in this figure). Spa-types with four or less repeats were excluded from the analysis (n = 18, <1% of all spa-types), since no reliable information about the phylogenetic relatedness can be inferred. Singletons: t099, t185, t246, t370, t377, t488, t647, t746, t803, t1345, t1406, t1416, t1491, t1707, t2441, t2553, t2845, t3258, t5152, t5682, t5683, t5688, t5690, t5758, t5759, t6191, t6193, t6194, t6195, t6375, t7271, t9886, t9887, t9888, t9896, t12680. Excluded spa-types: t026, t103, t129, t227, t362, t390, t524, t559, t605, t693, t779, t1050, t1544, t1991, t2383, t3745, t5687, t7065.
Patients with prevalent spa-types.
| Isolates ( | Percentage of all isolates (%) | Patients ( | Percentage of patients1 (%) | Patients with persistence2 ( | Percentage of patients with persistence (%) | Centers3 ( | ||
| t084 | CC084 | 310 | 7.8 | 36 | 19 | 18 | 50 | 16 |
| t091 | CC084 | 178 | 4.5 | 27 | 14 | 11 | 40 | 14 |
| t008 | CC008 | 138 | 3.5 | 18 | 9 | 11 | 61 | 10 |
| t015 | CC015 | 112 | 2.8 | 18 | 9 | 7 | 39 | 12 |
| t002 | CC002 | 108 | 2.8 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 44 | 9 |
| t012 | CC015 | 208 | 5.2 | 15 | 8 | 9 | 60 | 8 |
| t346 | CC084 | 72 | 1.8 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 21 | 9 |
| t056 | CC078 | 75 | 1.9 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 42 | 9 |
Mutations within the VNTR region of related spa-types.
| Patient | All clones1 | Related clones2 | Non-related3 | Percentage of related clones4 (%) | Number of isolates5 | VNTR region7 | Mutations8 | Repeat9 | Nucleotide sequence of the repeat region10 | |
| C1P4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 80 | 20 | 08-16-02-16-34-34-17-34- | ||||
| 1 | t295 | 08-16-02-16-34-34-17-34-34 | del | |||||||
| 2 | 11- | |||||||||
| 1 | t024 | 11-12-21-17-34-24-34-22-25 | del | |||||||
| C1P7 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 56 | 1 | 09- | r20 | AAAGAAGACAACAA | ||
| 1 | t040 | 09- | del and pm | r02 | AAAGAAGACAACAA | |||||
| 13 | t004 | 09-02-16-13-13-17-34-16-34 | pm | |||||||
| 7 | 07-23-12-34-12- | r12 | AAAGAAGACA | |||||||
| 1 | t2398 | 07-23-12-34-12- | pm | r66 | AAAGAAGACA | |||||
| C2P6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 67 | 4 | 07-23-12-34-34-12-12-23-02-12-23 | r12 | AAAGAAGACAACAACAAGCCTGG | ||
| 1 | t4096 | 07-23- | dupl and pm | r21 | AAAGAAGACAACAACAAGCCTGG | |||||
| C2P9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 43 | 26 | 07-23-12-34- | ||||
| 1 | t346 | 07-23-12-34-12-12-23-02-12-23 | del | |||||||
| 1 | t085 | 07-23-12-34-34-12-23-02-12-23 | del | |||||||
| C3P3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50 | 7 | 04-21-12-41-20-17-12- | ||||
| 6 | t081 | 04-21-12-41-20-17-12-17 | del | |||||||
| C3P9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40 | 13 | 07-23-12-12-34-12-12-23-02-12-23 | ||||
| 1 | t9897 | 07-23-12-12-34-12-12- | dupl |
FIGURE 2Minimum spanning tree of S. aureus isolates illustrating their genotypic relationship. 24 S. aureus strains are displayed representing different carriage profiles based on 1861 cgMLST target genes, pairwise ignoring missing values. Size of circles correlates with the number of identical genotypes. Different colors of circles indicate patients, from which S. aureus strains were chosen. Spa-types are given within different circles. Numbers on connecting lines indicate allele differences, gray shading indicates a close genetic similarity between different genotypes.