Literature DB >> 32174647

Norm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction.

Gilad Feldman1, Dolores Albarracín2.   

Abstract

The action-effect (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982) is one of the most widely cited and replicated effects in the regret literature, showing that negative outcomes are regretted more when they are a result of action compared to inaction. Building on theoretical arguments by norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) and the concept of normality, we examine the role of social norms for action and inaction in affecting regret. In four experiments we manipulated social norms and action-effect scenarios and found that social norms matter. For decisions resulting in negative outcomes, action is regretted more than inaction when social norms are for inaction, but when social norms are for action the effect is significantly weakened (Experiments 1 and 4) or reversed (Experiments 2 and 3).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action; Action-effect; Norm theory; Normality; Social norms

Year:  2016        PMID: 32174647      PMCID: PMC7069598          DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1031


  2 in total

1.  Action and inaction in multi-behaviour recommendations: a meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions.

Authors:  Dolores Albarracín; Kristina Wilson; Man-Pui Sally Chan; Marta Durantini; Flor Sanchez
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-09-22

2.  Distinguishing Active and Passive Outgroup Tolerance: Understanding Its Prevalence and the Role of Moral Concern.

Authors:  Levi Adelman; Maykel Verkuyten; Kumar Yogeeswaran
Journal:  Polit Psychol       Date:  2021-11-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.