Literature DB >> 32174546

The effect of high, medium and low mobilization forces applied during a hip long-axis distraction mobilization on the strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament and psoas muscle: A cadaveric study.

Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel1, Carlos López-de-Celis2, Santos Caudevilla-Polo3, Vanessa González-Rueda2, Elena Bueno-Gracia3, Albert Pérez-Bellmunt4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that the changes in elasticity of the joint capsule and surrounding muscles during a hip long-axis distraction mobilization (LADM) could explain the pain-relieving and mobility-improving effects of the technique.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament and psoas muscle when applying three different magnitudes of force during LADM.
DESIGN: Repeated measures controlled laboratory cadaveric study.
METHODS: Eleven hip joints were mobilized from six fresh-frozen cadavers (mean age, 73.4 ± 5.7 years). Three magnitudes of force (low, medium and high) were applied during a hip LADM in open-packed position according to grades of joint mobilization. Strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament and psoas muscle were measured with strain gauges. The magnitude of the force applied during LADM was recorded.
RESULTS: Strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament during a high-force LADM was significantly higher than strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament during low (p < 0.001) and medium-force LADM (p < 0.001). The strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament during a medium-force LADM was significantly higher than during a low-force LADM (p = 0.004). No changes in strain on psoas muscle were observed. The magnitude of force applied during LADM showed a significant progressive increase from low to high-force LADM.
CONCLUSION: The different magnitudes of forces applied during LADM produce different strains on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament but not on the psoas muscle. The strain on the inferior ilio-femoral ligament during LADM depends on the magnitude of the mobilization force.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32174546     DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract        ISSN: 2468-7812            Impact factor:   2.520


  2 in total

1.  In vivo measurements of glenohumeral distraction technique performed in three different joint positions.

Authors:  Diego Guerra-Rodríguez; Liliana Rozo; Daniel Basilio; Juan Guerrero-Henriquez
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-03-25

2.  The Effect of Scapular Fixation on Scapular and Humeral Head Movements during Glenohumeral Axial Distraction Mobilization.

Authors:  Carlos López-de-Celis; Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Santos Caudevilla-Polo; Vanessa González-Rueda; Elena Bueno-Gracia
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.