| Literature DB >> 32173900 |
Akimichi Morita1, Yumiko Tani2, Kazuko Matsumoto2, Masako Yamaguchi2, Rie Teshima2, Mamitaro Ohtsuki3.
Abstract
The molecular basis of interleukin (IL)-17A in driving psoriasis pathogenesis is not fully elucidated yet. To investigate the underlying mechanisms and biomarkers associated with IL-17A and the role in psoriasis pathogenesis, over 30 serum proteins were evaluated in a study assessing the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, where treatment was directly switched from cyclosporin A to secukinumab. Serum β-defensin 2 (BD-2) levels rapidly and robustly reduced following secukinumab treatment. BD-2 levels were well-correlated with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score; changes in BD-2 levels preceded change in PASI score. Serum BD-2, an easily measurable protein, can possibly be used as a suitable surrogate biomarker to monitor responses to IL-17A-targeted therapies for psoriasis in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; interleukin-17A; psoriasis; secukinumab; β-defensin 2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32173900 PMCID: PMC7318330 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dermatol ISSN: 0385-2407 Impact factor: 4.005
Serum proteins at baseline
| Chemokine | Median (quartile), ng/L | Reference, | Cytokine | Median (quartile), ng/L | Reference, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eotaxin | 98.0 (74.4–142.0) | 55.9 | GM‐CSF | 0.31 (0.24–0.39) | 0.18 |
| Eotaxin‐3 | 10.1 (6.5–16.6) | 8.2 | IFN‐γ | 3.90 (2.98–5.12) | 3.77 |
| IL‐8 (HA) | 662.0 (452.0–788.0) | 575.0 | IL‐1α | 0.10 (0.03–0.15) | 1.18 |
| IP‐10 | 319.0 (239.0–404.0) | 80.9 | IL‐1β | 0 (0–0.2) | 0.16 |
| MCP‐1 | 226.5 (188.0–274.0) | 118.0 | IL‐2 | 0.27 (0.16–0.33) | 0.52 |
| MCP‐4 | 103.5 (74.0–142.0) | 44.3 | IL‐4 | 0.06 (0.03–0.07) | ND |
| MDC | 1130.0 (828.0–1590.0) | 1350.0 | IL‐5 | 0.07 (0–0.47) | 0.28 |
| MIP‐1α | 14.8 (13.7–16.4) | 37.0 | IL‐6 | 0.79 (0.56–1.40) | 0.47 |
| MIP‐1β | 106.0 (72.4–137.0) | 53.1 | IL‐7 | 25.60 (18.0–32.80) | 0.92 |
| TARC | 287.5 (178.0–412.0) | 29.1 | IL‐8 | 10.85 (8.56–13.40) | 9.61 |
| IL‐10 | 0.28 (0.20–0.36) | 0.20 | |||
|
|
|
| IL‐12/IL‐23p40 | 56.00 (39.80–79.00) | 53.30 |
| BD‐2 | 5850.0 (1910.0–11 000.0) | 0.2 | IL‐12p70 | 0.20 (0.11–0.25) | 0.29 |
| IL‐13 | 0.79 (0.62–1.05) | 1.65 | |||
| IL‐15 | 2.22 (1.87–2.58) | 1.29 | |||
| IL‐16 | 224.00 (188.00–328.00) | 59.90 | |||
| IL‐17A | 3.44 (2.02–5.72) | 0.93 | |||
| TNF‐α | 2.42 (1.84–2.86) | 0.36 | |||
| TNF‐β | 0.34 (0.24–0.42) | 0.15 | |||
| VEGF‐A | 90.90 (57.40–157.00) | 9.62 |
Reference values refer to assay kit product insert and published report on healthy human subjects. pg/mL is equivalent to ng/L. Different detection antibodies were used for IL‐8 measurement in chemokine and cytokine panel according to manufacturers’ instructions. BD, β‐defensin; GM, geometric mean; GM‐CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factors; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; IP, interferon‐γ‐inducible protein; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MDC, macrophage derived chemokine; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; ND, non‐detectable; TARC, thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 1Serum chemokine, cytokine and BD‐2 levels pre‐/post‐secukinumab treatment. Serum (a) chemokine, (b) cytokine and (c) BD‐2 levels were measured in samples collected at baseline, and weeks 2 and 16. Mean (x), median (o), 25 percentile (lower line) and 75 percentile (upper line) are presented. Different detection antibodies were used for IL‐8 measurement in chemokine and cytokine panel according to the manufacturers’ instructions. BD, β‐defensin; GM‐CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factors; IL, interleukin; IP, interferon‐γ‐inducible protein; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MDC, macrophage‐derived chemokine; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; TARC, thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Correlation between PASI score and serum proteins
| Baseline ( | All time points | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficient |
| Correlation coefficient |
| |
| Chemokine | ||||
| Eotaxin | 0.006 | 0.972 | 0.002 | 0.982 |
| Eotaxin‐3 | 0.125 | 0.481 | 0.022 | 0.825 |
| IL‐8 (HA) | −0.197 | 0.263 | −0.022 | 0.83 |
| IP‐10 | 0.134 | 0.451 | −0.06 | 0.548 |
| MCP‐1 | 0.120 | 0.499 | −0.037 | 0.715 |
| MCP‐4 | −0.004 | 0.983 | 0.07 | 0.482 |
| MDC |
|
| 0.187 | 0.06 |
| MIP‐1α |
|
| 0.076 | 0.448 |
| MIP‐1β | −0.033 | 0.854 | −0.169 | 0.09 |
| TARC | 0.264 | 0.131 | 0.167 | 0.094 |
| Cytokine | ||||
| GM‐CSF | −0.173 | 0.328 | −0.117 | 0.242 |
| IFN‐γ |
|
|
|
|
| IL‐1α | −0.138 | 0.435 | 0.075 | 0.455 |
| IL‐1β | −0.143 | 0.419 | 0.07 | 0.482 |
| IL‐2 | −0.221 | 0.209 | −0.037 | 0.714 |
| IL‐4 | 0.256 | 0.143 | 0.16 | 0.109 |
| IL‐5 | −0.182 | 0.303 | −0.073 | 0.464 |
| IL‐6 | 0.231 | 0.189 | 0.167 | 0.093 |
| IL‐7 | 0.164 | 0.354 | 0.105 | 0.295 |
| IL‐8 | 0.122 | 0.491 | 0.128 | 0.199 |
| IL‐10 | −0.186 | 0.293 | 0.133 | 0.184 |
| IL‐12/IL‐23p40 | 0.104 | 0.557 | 0.009 | 0.925 |
| IL‐12p70 | −0.247 | 0.159 | −0.164 | 0.099 |
| IL‐13 | 0.141 | 0.428 | 0.046 | 0.644 |
| IL‐15 | −0.112 | 0.528 | −0.002 | 0.981 |
| IL‐16 |
|
| 0.195 | 0.05 |
| IL‐17A | 0.220 | 0.211 |
|
|
| TNF‐α | 0.329 | 0.058 | 0.076 | 0.446 |
| TNF‐β | −0.212 | 0.228 | 0.034 | 0.734 |
| VEGF‐A | 0.228 | 0.194 | 0.169 | 0.09 |
| Other | ||||
| BD‐2 |
|
|
|
|
Pearson correlation analysis presented in this table was evaluated using the baseline and pooled data of PASI scores and serum proteins observed at the three time points (baseline, week 2 and week 16). Different detection antibodies were used for IL‐8 measurement in chemokine and cytokine panel according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Bold indicates positive/negative correlation and significance at P < 0.05. BD, β‐defensin; GM‐CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factors; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; IP, interferon‐γ‐inducible protein; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MDC, macrophage‐derived chemokine; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; TARC, thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 2Correlation between PASI score and serum BD‐2 level. Serum samples from baseline, and weeks 2 and 16 were pooled for analysis and the correlation was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient using PASI score and BD‐2 concentration. Data from FAS. BD, β‐defensin; FAS, full analysis set; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index.
Figure 3Relative change in individual PASI score from baseline and in individual serum BD‐2 level from baseline. PASI score and blood samples were collected at baseline, and weeks 2 and 16. Change of (a) PASI score and (b) serum BD‐2 at weeks 2 and 16 were evaluated relative to baseline. Data from FAS. BD, β‐defensin; FAS, full analysis set; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index.