Literature DB >> 32173753

Reply to Y Gao et al.

Iván Cavero-Redondo1,2, Celia Álvarez-Bueno1,2, Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino1,3.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32173753      PMCID： PMC7073311          DOI： 10.1093/advances/nmz109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN： 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Jüni; A Witschi; R Bloch; M Egger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  P Jüni; D G Altman; M Egger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

3.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Candyce Hamel; George A Wells; Lex M Bouter; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Jeremy Grimshaw; David A Henry; Maarten Boers
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Milk and Dairy Product Consumption and Risk of Mortality: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Ivan Cavero-Redondo; Celia Alvarez-Bueno; Mercedes Sotos-Prieto; Angel Gil; Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino; Jonatan R Ruiz
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Barnaby C Reeves; George Wells; Micere Thuku; Candyce Hamel; Julian Moran; David Moher; Peter Tugwell; Vivian Welch; Elizabeth Kristjansson; David A Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-09-21

6.  Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  Michelle Pollock; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.

Authors:  Dawid Pieper; Nadja Koensgen; Jessica Breuing; Long Ge; Uta Wegewitz
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Lex M Bouter; Joan Peterson; Maarten Boers; Neil Andersson; Zulma Ortiz; Tim Ramsay; Annie Bai; Vijay K Shukla; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.