Literature DB >> 32173047

Minority participation in phase 1 gynecologic oncology clinical trials: Three decades of inequity.

Eli Awad1, Rajesh Paladugu1, Nathaniel Jones1, Jennifer Young Pierce1, Jennifer Scalici1, Chad A Hamilton2, Kathleen M Darcy2, G Larry Maxwell2, Rodney P Rocconi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is important to develop effective therapies in minorities to ensure equity in cancer care. Underrepresentation of minorities in early phase trials may cause therapies that are effective only in majority populations. We evaluated minority participation in gynecologic oncology phase 1 clinical trials.
METHODS: In peer-reviewed published articles of gynecologic oncology phase 1 clinical trials from years 1985 to 2018, we manually abstracted racial distribution of enrolled participants, cancer type, and year published. We calculated expected and observed ratios of racial participation on the basis of age-adjusted cancer incidence for race from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
RESULTS: We identified 357 articles of phase 1 trials (total, 9492 participants), including 213 articles on ovarian cancer (60%). Racial distribution of participants was available in 84 articles (23%) that included 2483 participants (26%): 1950 white (79%), 140 black (5%), and 393 other participants (16%). Other nonwhite races exceeded black enrollment in 46 of 84 trials (55%) that listed race. Enrollment of black participants was less than expected from disease incidence for ovarian (incidence-to-enrollment ratio, 18.5; P < .001), endometrial (3.6; P < .001), and cervical cancer (6.8; P < .001). No phase 1 study met expected enrollment for black participants. Frequency of black participants decreased 1.8-fold from 1995 to 1999 (8 of 70 participants [11%]) to 2015-2018 (55 of 892 participants [6%]; P < .025).
CONCLUSIONS: Major racial underrepresentation exists in gynecologic oncology phase 1 clinical trials. Enrollment of more black participants is needed to achieve racial equity.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Race; Treatment; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32173047     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

Review 1.  Endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Vicky Makker; Helen MacKay; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Douglas A Levine; Shannon N Westin; Daisuke Aoki; Ana Oaknin
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 65.038

Review 2.  Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences.

Authors:  Kate Escritt; Mala Mann; Annmarie Nelson; Emily Harrop
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Disparities in cancer-specific and overall survival in black women with endometrial cancer: A Medicare-SEER study.

Authors:  Daniel H Saris; Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith; Colleen Brensinger; Sarah H Kim; Ashley F Haggerty; Nawar Latif; Lori Cory; Robert L Giuntoli; Mark A Morgan; Lilie L Lin; Emily M Ko
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-06

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Recurrent Microsatellite-Stable Endometrial Cancer in Early-Phase Immunotherapy Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey A How; Amir A Jazaeri; Siqing Fu; Jordi Rodon Ahnert; Jing Gong; Bettzy Stephen; Hanna Ferreira Dalla Pria; Priya Bhosale; Amber Johnson; Ying Yuan; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Aung Naing
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.575

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.