Literature DB >> 32172330

Evaluation of flexible ureteroscope with an omni-directional bending tip, using a JOYSTICK unit (URF-Y0016): an ex-vivo study.

T Inoue1,2, S Okada3, S Hamamoto4, H Miura5, J Matsuzaki6, M Tambo7, H Fukuhara7, M Fujisawa8, T Matsuda9, K Nutahara10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the range of reach of our newly designed omni-directional ureteroscope (URF-Y0016), compared to the commonly used URF-P6, FlexX2s, and LithoVue™ scopes, in the upper, middle, and lower calyces in an ex-vivo pyelocaliceal model.
METHODS: We fabricated a three-dimensional pyelocaliceal model of the upper, middle, and lower pole calyces using urethane and acrylic resin. The inner surface of the dome of each calyx was engraved with reference lines along eight directions, set at 10° of latitude from the top to the base of the dome, and at angles of 0-90°, to precisely determine the range of reach of each scope. The main feature of the URF-Y0016 scope is the omni-directional bending of the tip of the flexible ureteroscope, with the control of these four directions integrated into a handgun-type control unit with a joystick. The range of reach within each calyx was measured by four expert surgeons.
RESULTS: The URF-Y0016 scope provided a greater range of reach along all directions in the lower pole calyx compared to URF-P6, FlexX2s, and LithoVue™ scopes (p < 0.001), particularly along the anterior-posterior direction in the lower lobe calyx. However, the URF-Y0016 scope did not influence the improvement of reach range in the upper and middle pole calyx compared to URF-P6, FlexX2s, and LithoVue™ scopes (p = 0.08, p = 0.296).
CONCLUSION: The novel design of the URF-Y0016 could improve treatment outcomes for calyceal stones in the lower pole in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Joystick handle; Lower pole access; New technology of fURS; Omni-directional bending

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32172330     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03151-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  3 in total

1.  Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liu Junbo; Li Yugen; Jiang Guo; Huang Jing; Yu Ruichao; Wu Tao
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 1.510

2.  A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.

Authors:  Sercan Sari; Hakki Ugur Ozok; Mehmet Caglar Cakici; Harun Ozdemir; Okan Bas; Nihat Karakoyunlu; Levent Sagnak; Aykut Bugra Senturk; Hamit Ersoy
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.510

3.  Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Sulaiman Sadaf Karim; Luke Hanna; Robert Geraghty; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  3 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Takaaki Inoue; Shinsuke Okada; Shuzo Hamamoto; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.