Benoît S Assogba1,2,3,4, Nicole Pasteur5, Patrick Makoundou5, Sandra Unal5, Lamine Baba-Moussa6, Pierrick Labbé5, Mylène Weill5. 1. Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), UMR CNRS-IRD-EPHE-Université de Montpellier, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France. assobe80@gmail.com. 2. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Laboratoire de Biologie et de Typage Moléculaire en Microbiologie, Université d'Abomey Calavi, 05 BP 1604, Cotonou, Benin. assobe80@gmail.com. 3. Institut Régional de Santé Publique, Université d'Abomey Calavi, 01 BP 918, Cotonou, Benin. assobe80@gmail.com. 4. Disease Control and Elimination Department, Medical Research Council, Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia. assobe80@gmail.com. 5. Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), UMR CNRS-IRD-EPHE-Université de Montpellier, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095, Montpellier, France. 6. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Laboratoire de Biologie et de Typage Moléculaire en Microbiologie, Université d'Abomey Calavi, 05 BP 1604, Cotonou, Benin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insecticide resistance is a growing concern for malaria control and vector control effectiveness relies on assessing it distribution and understanding its evolution. METHODS: We assessed resistance levels and the frequencies of two major target-site mutations, L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1, conferring resistance to pyrethroids (PYRs) and carbamates/organophosphates (CXs/OPs) insecticides. These data were compared to those acquired between 2006 and 2010 to follow resistance evolutionary trends over ten years. RESULTS: We report the results of a 3-year survey (2013-2015) of insecticide resistance in 13 localities across the whole country of Benin. Permethrin (PYR) resistance was found in all populations tested, L1014F-VGSC being almost fixed everywhere, while bendiocarb resistance was limited to a few localities, G119S-ace-1 remaining rare, with very limited variations during surveyed period. Interestingly, we found no effect of the type of insecticide pressure on the dynamics of these mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm both the high prevalence of PYR resistance and the potential of CXs/OPs as short- to medium-term alternatives in Benin. They also underline the need for regular resistance monitoring and informed management in their usage, as the G119S-ace-1 mutation is already present in Benin and surrounding countries. Their unwise usage would rapidly lead to its spread, which would jeopardize PYR-resistant Anopheles control.
BACKGROUND: Insecticide resistance is a growing concern for malaria control and vector control effectiveness relies on assessing it distribution and understanding its evolution. METHODS: We assessed resistance levels and the frequencies of two major target-site mutations, L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1, conferring resistance to pyrethroids (PYRs) and carbamates/organophosphates (CXs/OPs) insecticides. These data were compared to those acquired between 2006 and 2010 to follow resistance evolutionary trends over ten years. RESULTS: We report the results of a 3-year survey (2013-2015) of insecticide resistance in 13 localities across the whole country of Benin. Permethrin (PYR) resistance was found in all populations tested, L1014F-VGSC being almost fixed everywhere, while bendiocarb resistance was limited to a few localities, G119S-ace-1 remaining rare, with very limited variations during surveyed period. Interestingly, we found no effect of the type of insecticide pressure on the dynamics of these mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm both the high prevalence of PYR resistance and the potential of CXs/OPs as short- to medium-term alternatives in Benin. They also underline the need for regular resistance monitoring and informed management in their usage, as the G119S-ace-1 mutation is already present in Benin and surrounding countries. Their unwise usage would rapidly lead to its spread, which would jeopardize PYR-resistant Anopheles control.
Controlling mosquito vectors of human diseases is a major health issue, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa where Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) is the main vector of malaria transmission. Malaria control is mainly based on insecticide use in the form of LLINs (long-lasting insecticide nets) and IRS (indoor residual spraying) [1]. Pyrethroid insecticides (PYRs) have been the cornerstone of malaria prevention in Africa for almost two decades, after Abuja Declaration in 2000, when Benin and the rest West African countries set-up a proper plan against malaria control [2]. However, the ability of vectors to survive insecticide treatments (i.e. become resistant) is a growing concern, as it may threaten vector control effectiveness for preventing malaria transmission [3-6]. Insecticide resistance is indeed widespread in natural populations in West Africa and more particularly in Benin, Burkina Faso and Ivory Coast [7-9].In Benin, the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) started a large and extensive distribution programme of pyrethroid-treated LLINs across the country in 2008 [2]. Moreover, through the USA PMI programme (President Malaria Initiative), large-scale indoor spraying campaigns are implemented since 2008, using carbamate (CXs) and organophosphate (OPs) insecticides [10].In addition to this insecticide pressure due to malaria vector control, insecticides are widely used in agriculture for crop protection. Agricultural pesticides often belong to the same classes as those used for vector control [7, 11]. Thus, they can affect the susceptibility of vector populations by increasing the frequencies of existing resistance mechanisms, or by selecting new mechanisms [11-14]. Because these selective pressures are heterogeneous, resistance frequency and its effect on vector control could vary from one population to another and over time [12].This situation called the World Health Organization (WHO) to publish a Global Plan for Insecticide Resistance Management (GPIRM) [15] in 2012 (recently extended by guidelines at the national level), which emphasized the need for improved strategies for insecticide resistance management and prevention [16]. This objective cannot be achieved if the forces driving insecticide resistance evolution are not clearly understood and monitored.Insecticide resistance dynamics, and thus long-term efficacy of vector control strategies, indeed depends on the biological characteristics of vectors, and the intensity and spatio-temporal distribution of selection pressures. It is therefore crucial to monitor the general patterns of resistance allele variations in relation with the various selective pressures that could drive these variations in vector populations. In the present study, we performed an updated overview of resistance status of An. gambiae (s.l.) in different agroclimatic zones with varying practices of insecticide across the whole Benin country. We acquired relevant information regarding selection pressure sources and its evolution to assess how they could contribute to the selection of two major target sites resistance mechanisms (the L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 mutations, respectively for PYRs and CXs/OPs resistance). These two mutations are the major one involved into PYR and CXs/OPs resistant in An. gambiae (s.l.) in West Africa. However, other SNPs have been recently identified in the voltage gate sodium channel gene (VGSC), but data on their role in insecticide resistance are lacking [17, 18]. We provide encouraging data for CXs and OPs uses as means to circumvent the high An. gambiae (s.l.) PYR resistance in Benin for short- and medium-term.
Methods
Study sites and mosquito collections
This study was carried out in 13 localities following a longitudinal transect across Benin (Fig. 1): five localities in the southern part, characterized by a Guinean bioclimate (two rainy seasons, April–July and September–November and an average annual rainfall of 1500 mm); four localities in the central part, characterized by a Sudano-Guinean bioclimate (two rainy seasons, April–July and September–November with an average annual rainfall of 1000 mm); and four localities in the northern part, characterized by a Sudanese bioclimate (one rainy season, June to October and an average annual rainfall of 900 mm). These localities were selected according to insecticide use for crops protection or for malaria vector control and priority was given to localities involved in previous studies, to assess resistance dynamics (Table 1): (i) seven localities (Cotonou, Grand-Popo, Bohicon, Abomey, Glazoué, Bembèrèkè and Kandi), where vegetables and cotton are produced, with strong economic interests for the farmers and government, are thus mainly exposed to agricultural treatments; (ii) four localities (Tori-Bossito, Avrankou, Djougou and Natitingou) are less exposed to these agricultural insecticides, but have been selected for specific experimental malaria vector control intervention (MVCI), with more intense vector control interventions, i.e. more frequent turnover of bednets and IRS implementation; and (iii) two localities have little insecticide exposure, with limited insecticides usage for domestic production or public-health (Covè and Comè).
Fig. 1
Map of the sample sites and insecticide resistant allele frequencies (L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1) in natural populations of An. gambiae (s.l.) from of Benin. Abbreviation: MVCI, malaria vector control intervention
Table 1
List of studied localities and their characteristics
Locality
Environment
Agricultural practice
Agroclimatic zone
Insecticide pressure origin
Reference
Cotonou
Urban
Vegetables
Guinean
Agriculture (OCs/OPs/PYRs)
[6]
Grand-Popo
Urban
Vegetables
Guinean
Agriculture (OCs/OPs/PYRs)
Present study
Bohicon
Urban
Cereals/Cotton
Soudano-Guinean
Agriculture (OCs/OPs/PYRs)
[6]
Abomey
Urban
Cereals/Cotton
Soudano-Guinean
Agriculture (OCs/OPs/PYRs)
[6]
Glazoue
Urban
Cereals
Soudano-Guinean
Agriculture (OCs/OPs/PYRs)
[6]
Kandi
Rural
Cotton
Soudanian
Agriculture (OCs/OPs/PYRs)
[6]
Bembèrèkè
Rural
Cotton
Soudanian
Agriculture (OCs/OPs/PYRs)
[6]
Tori-Bossito
Rural
Cereals/Fruits
Guinean
MVCI (CXs/PYRs)
[6]
Avrankou
Rural
Cereals
Guinean
MVCI (CXs/PYRs)
Present study
Djougou
Urban
Cotton
Soudanian
MVCI (CXs/PYRs)
[6]
Natitingou
Urban
Cotton
Soudanian
MVCI (OPs/CXs/PYRs)
[6]
Comé
Rural
Cereals
Guinean
Average
[11]
Covè
Rural
Cereals
Soudano-Guinean
Average
Present study
The collection period was from August to September in 2013, 2014 and 2015
Notes: OCs, PYRs, OPs and CXs correspond to organochlorines, pyrethroids, organophosphates and carbamates insecticides, respectively. MVCI corresponds to areas with reinforced malaria vector control interventions. Agriculture corresponds to areas where exposure to insecticides results mostly from their uses for crop cultures. Average corresponds to areas with limited insecticide uses for domestic agriculture and vector control (low turnover of impregnated bednets, see text)
Map of the sample sites and insecticide resistant allele frequencies (L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1) in natural populations of An. gambiae (s.l.) from of Benin. Abbreviation: MVCI, malaria vector control interventionList of studied localities and their characteristicsThe collection period was from August to September in 2013, 2014 and 2015Notes: OCs, PYRs, OPs and CXs correspond to organochlorines, pyrethroids, organophosphates and carbamates insecticides, respectively. MVCI corresponds to areas with reinforced malaria vector control interventions. Agriculture corresponds to areas where exposure to insecticides results mostly from their uses for crop cultures. Average corresponds to areas with limited insecticide uses for domestic agriculture and vector control (low turnover of impregnated bednets, see text)Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) larvae were sampled in these localities over three years (2013–2015). Note that due to field conditions and availability of the larvae during the sampling campaign, we were not able to collect a sample in each locality each year. At least 2000 larvae were collected from different breeding sites within a 1-km radius, in order to have enough adults per locality for the different tests included into this study.
Species identification
All emerged adult mosquitoes were assigned to the An. gambiae (s.l.) cryptic species complex using morphological and molecular tests [19-21] after DNA extraction from whole mosquito as described in Assogba et al. [22].
Insecticide susceptibility bioassays of An. gambiae (s.l.) populations
Susceptibility assays were implemented according to the WHO protocol using 2- to 5-day-old mosquitoes [23]. When enough adults were available, four replicates of 20–25 mosquitoes per tube were exposed to filter papers impregnated with insecticide for 1 h supplied by the WHO Collaborating Centre, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. After exposure, mosquitoes were transferred to a clean holding tube supplied with 10% sugar meal and mortality was recorded 24 h after exposure. Two insecticides were tested: permethrin (0.75%, a pyrethroid type I) and bendiocarb (0.1% carbamate). According to the WHO recommendations [23], the susceptibility status of each locality was accessed as susceptible, likely resistant and resistant, when observed mortality was 98–100%, 90–98% and less than 90%, respectively. After exposure to insecticide, survivors and dead mosquitoes were stored in silica gel for further analysis.
Genotyping of L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1
In An. gambiae (s.l.), the L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 mutations are the major insecticide target-site resistance alleles for PYRs and CXs resistance, respectively. After exposure to permethrin (PYRs) or bendiocarb (CXs), survivors and dead individuals were genotyped using classical molecular tests [24, 25]. Moreover, 2263 individuals from the 13 localities, unexposed to insecticides, were also genotyped for these mutations to assess resistant alleles frequency dynamics in natural populations.In populations where a heterozygote deficit was found, the VGSC locus was Sanger-sequenced to confirm VGSC genotypes using the Agd1 and Agd2 primers (293 bp PCR fragment), as described in [22]. We also sequenced (i) two resistant homozygotes An. arabiensis from Djougou (2015); (ii) one resistant homozygote An. arabiensis, one heterozygote and one resistant homozygote An. coluzzii from Bembèrèkè (2015); and (iii) one susceptible homozygote and one heterozygote An. arabiensis, as well as one susceptible homozygote An. coluzzii from Glazoué (2015).
Statistical analyses
Data from bioassays
To test whether the mortality (Mortal) was impacted by several variables, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was computed as: Mortal= Select + Year + Select:Year + (1| Pop) + ε, where Select is a 3-level factor indicating the nature of the insecticide pressure, Pop is a multi-level factor corresponding to the sampled population and Year is a 3-level factor corresponding to the year of sampling (Table 1); “:” indicates an interaction between factors, ε is the error parameter, following a binomial distribution. The Pop factor was computed as a random effect, because each population was exposed to only one kind of insecticide pressure. As bioassays were performed on adults and they were all morphological identified belonging to An. gambiae (s.l.), it was not possible to take into account the Anopheles species independently. The Pop factor thus includes inter-population differences in urbanness, bioclimate and species. The model was simplified as follows: significance of the different fixed terms was tested, starting from the interaction term, using likelihood ratio tests (LRT) corrected for overdispersion [26, 27] as described by Crawley [28]; non-significant terms (P > 0.05) were removed.Fisherʼs exact test was used to compare the L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 phenotypic distributions (i.e. number of RR, RS and SS individuals) between dead mosquitoes and survivors, independently in each population, each year and for each species. Sequential Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used to identify potential false positives [29].
Population genetics analysis
To analyze the population genetic structure, we used Genepop version 4.2 online (http://genepop.curtin.edu.au). In the 2013–2015 samples, F (assessing deviation from the panmictic equilibrium) were estimated independently in each species, each population and each year and F (assessing differentiation between populations, i.e. population structure) independently for each year and species (according to Weir & Cockerham [30]).To analyze the distribution and long-term dynamics of the resistance allele frequencies, L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 genotyping data, collected in the same sampling sites between 2006 and 2010 and published in previous studies [7, 11, 31–35], or collected during this study (2013–2015), were combined. Multinomial log-linear models (multinom function in the R package nnet) were computed independently for each locus as: Geno = Pop + Year + Sp + Pop: Year + Pop: Sp + Year: Sp + Pop:Year:Sp + ε, where Geno is a 3-level response variable corresponding to numbers of individuals for each genotype RR, RS and SS, Pop is a multi-level factor corresponding to the sampled population, Year is a continuous variable corresponding to the year of sampling (to test for temporal variations) and Sp is a 3-level factor corresponding to the species (arabiensis, gambiae or coluzzii); “:” indicates an interaction between variables, ε is the error parameter, following a multinomial distribution.These models were simplified as indicated above. When significant Year effect or Year:Pop interactions were detected, thus suggesting inter-annual variations of the genotype distribution, we analyzed each population of each species independently. We tested the significance of the Year variable by comparing (using LRT) the models Geno = Year + ε and Geno = 1 + ε. Sequential Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was used to identify potential false positives [29]. All computations were performed using the R free software (v.3.3.3) [28].
Results
High permethrin resistance but low bendiocarb resistance
In Benin, exposure of An. gambiae (s.l.). populations to insecticides has two main origins: agriculture or vector control. During three years, we surveyed 13 populations from Benin, to assess their potential impacts on insecticide resistance dynamics (Table 1, Fig. 1). These localities were chosen because they presented strong contrasts in their main selective pressure. In crop production localities, agricultural usages of insecticides exceed by far the public-health exposure (“Agriculture” localities, Table 1). Other localities, with only limited crop farming, were chosen because vector control (“MVCI” localities, Table 1) is increased through more frequent distribution of impregnated bednets (1-year turnover) and indoor residual spraying in houses, so that public health is the main source of insecticides. Other localities were chosen because they present more limited insecticide usage (“Average” localities, Table 1). Note however, that agricultural usage for domestic production, as well as exposure to impregnated bednets (3-year turnover), are present in all these populations.To first assess differences in resistance levels, larvae were collected in natural populations, emerged in the laboratory and 3–5-days-old females were exposed to permethrin or bendiocarb at the WHO discriminating doses. Mortality in control groups (i.e. unexposed to insecticides) was consistently < 5%, while the mortality of Kisumu individuals (the susceptible reference strain) was above 99% for both insecticides. All tested populations showed resistance to permethrin (mortality < 90%), but the mortality rate was highly variable between populations and between years (Fig. 2, permethrin).
Fig. 2
Mortality and susceptibility to insecticides status of An. gambiae (s.l.) from 13 localities of Benin sampled in September 2013, 2014 and 2015. The bars indicate the mortality percentage with 95% confidence intervals after one hour of exposure to impregnated paper in the WHO test kits and mortality reading after 24 h. The status “Susceptible”, “Likely resistant” and “Resistant” correspond to 98–100%, 90–98% and less than 90% mortality, respectively (WHO, 2016 [23]). Kisumu is the An. gambiae (s.s.) susceptible reference strain for the insecticides tested. The nature of the main insecticide exposure, agriculture, malaria vector control initiative (MVCI) or not identified (NI), is indicated
Mortality and susceptibility to insecticides status of An. gambiae (s.l.) from 13 localities of Benin sampled in September 2013, 2014 and 2015. The bars indicate the mortality percentage with 95% confidence intervals after one hour of exposure to impregnated paper in the WHO test kits and mortality reading after 24 h. The status “Susceptible”, “Likely resistant” and “Resistant” correspond to 98–100%, 90–98% and less than 90% mortality, respectively (WHO, 2016 [23]). Kisumu is the An. gambiae (s.s.) susceptible reference strain for the insecticides tested. The nature of the main insecticide exposure, agriculture, malaria vector control initiative (MVCI) or not identified (NI), is indicatedWe found a significant effect of the interaction between the nature of the main insecticide pressures and the collection year on mortality (GLMM, LRT corrected for overdispersion, P < 0.001; note that a large overdispersion, 3.01, was observed). Therefore, the effect of the nature of insecticide pressures on mortality was analyzed for each year independently. While no significant difference was found in 2013 and 2014 (GLMM, LRT, P-value > 0.05; no overdispersion), in 2015 the mortality in populations exposed to insecticides mostly from agriculture origins (Bohicon, Kandi and Bembèrèkè) was significantly higher than in populations exposed mostly to MVCI (Djougou and Natitingou) (GLMM, LRT, P < 0.001; no overdispersion).Bendiocarb susceptibility was generally high (Fig. 2, bendiocarb), although some variability was observed between populations and between years. The interaction between the nature of the insecticide pressures and the collection year again showed a significant effect on mortality (GLMM, LRT corrected for overdispersion, P-value < 0.001; moderate overdispersion, 1.46). Analyzing each year independently, we found no significant effect of the nature of insecticide pressures on mortality (GLMM, LRT, P-value > 0.05; no overdispersion).For each population independently, the dead or surviving larvae after exposure to permethrin or bendiocarb were genotyped for the L1014F-VGSC or G119S-ace-1 mutations, respectively.After exposure to permethrin, the frequency of L1014F-VGSC mutation was very high in both the dead and surviving individuals for all populations, usually over 0.7 (Additional file 1: Table S1). The L1014F-VGSC phenotypic distributions (i.e. numbers of RR, RS and SS individuals) were, however, significantly different between dead and surviving larvae overall (i.e. pooling all samples) for each year independently (Fisherʼs exact test on all dead and surviving larvae and all species, P < 0.001, Additional file 1: Table S3). However, there was no consistent difference between species or between years for any population (ex. for Anopheles arabiensis, we found no phenotypic distribution difference between dead and surviving larvae in 2013, significant differences in 2014, but again none in 2015; Additional file 1: Table S3).After exposure to bendiocarb, there were overall very few individuals carrying the G119S-ace-1 mutation in both the dead and surviving individuals for all populations and the mutation frequency was usually below 0.05 in dead and usually over 0.2 in surviving larvae (Additional file 1: Table S2). Again, there was no consistent G119S-ace-1 phenotypic distribution difference between the dead and surviving larvae, be it between species or between years for any population (Additional file 1: Table S3).
Heterogeneous resistance allele frequencies in natural populations of An. gambiae (s.l.)
A total of 2263 individuals collected from the same sites from 2013 to 2015, but unexposed to insecticides (50–60 from each site, Table 2) were then analyzed at the molecular level. We first assessed to which species these individuals belonged and found three Anopheles species, An. coluzzii (n = 1198), An. gambiae (s.s.) (n = 782) and An. arabiensis (n = 271), as well as very rare coluzzii-gambiae (s.s.) hybrids (n = 12) (see Table 2). These individuals were then screened for L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 mutations to assess their frequencies and follow-up their evolution in natural populations.
Table 2
Frequencies of L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 mutations over ten years (2006–2015) in Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) populations of Benin
Species
Locality
Year
Insecticide resistance alleles
Reference
G119S-ace-1
P-value
L1014F-VGSC
P-value
SS
RS
RR
f
SS
RS
RR
f
An. arabiensis
Bembèrèkè
2013
10
0
0
0
ns
7
0
3
0.30
ns
Present study
2014
39
0
0
0
39
0
0
0
Present study
2015
15
0
0
0
14
1
0
0.03
Present study
Bohicon
2006
66
0
0
0
ns
66
0
0
0
ns
[6]
2008
–
–
–
–
1
4
2
0.57
[29]
2014
15
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
Present study
Djougou
2014
1
0
0
0
ns
1
0
0
0
ns
Present study
2015
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
Present study
Glazoué
2007
57
0
0
0
ns
57
0
0
0
***
[6]
2013
36
0
0
0
36
0
0
0
Present study
2014
39
0
0
0
39
0
0
0
Present study
2015
58
0
0
0
2
0
56
0.97
Present study
Kandi
2007
32
0
0
0
ns
32
0
0
0
ns
[6]
2013
16
0
0
0
13
0
3
0.19
Present study
2014
38
0
0
0
36
0
2
0.05
Present study
2015
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Present study
An. coluzzii
Abomey
2006
3
0
0
0
ns
2
1
0
0.17
ns
[6]
2013
6
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
Present study
2014
50
3
0
0.03
0
0
53
1
Present study
2015
29
0
0
0
0
0
29
1
Present study
Avrankou
2013
35
2
0
0
ns
5
8
24
0.76
ns
Present study
2014
59
1
0
0
3
13
44
0.84
Present study
2015
60
0
0
0
10
20
30
0.67
Present study
Bembèrèkè
2015
13
0
0
0
–
3
7
3
0.50
–
Present study
Bohicon
2006
2
0
0
0
ns
0
0
2
1
***(ns)
[6]
2008
–
–
–
–
5
1
1
0.21
[29]
2010
–
–
–
–
1
0
11
0.92
[29]
2013
44
0
0
0
1
3
40
0.94
Present study
2014
28
0
0
0
1
3
24
0.91
Present study
2015
25
0
0
0
0
1
24
0.98
Present study
Comè
2009
30
0
0
0
ns
1
11
18
0.78
*(ns)
[30]
2013
56
0
0
0
0
3
53
0.97
Present study
2014
51
1
0
0.01
2
12
37
0.84
Present study
2015
60
0
0
0
0
7
53
0.94
Present study
Cotonou
2006
–
–
–
–
ns
93
140
67
0.46
***
[31]
2007
92
0
0
0
3
13
79
0.90
[6]
2008
–
–
–
–
3
5
31
0.86
[29]
2009
72
0
0
0
3
29
97
0.86
[29, 30]
2010
–
–
–
–
0
9
37
0.90
[29]
2013
60
0
0
0
0
3
57
0.98
Present study
2014
33
3
0
0.04
0
1
35
0.99
Present study
2015
59
0
0
0
8
27
24
0.64
Present study
Covè
2013
58
0
0
0
ns
0
11
47
0.91
ns
Present study
2014
59
0
0
0
1
12
46
0.88
Present study
2015
59
0
0
0
1
2
56
0.97
Present study
Djougou
2015
1
0
0
0
–
1
0
0
0
–
Present study
Glazoué
2013
1
0
0
0
ns
0
0
1
1
ns
Present study
2014
4
0
0
0
1
0
3
0.75
Present study
2015
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Present study
Grand-Popo
2013
56
7
0
0.06
ns
0
3
60
0.98
ns
Present study
2014
60
0
0
0
1
21
38
0.81
Present study
2015
57
1
0
0.01
11
19
28
0.65
Present study
Kandi
2014
2
0
0
0
–
1
1
0
0.25
–
Present study
Tori Bossito
2007
41
0
0
0
ns
33
8
0
0.10
***
[32]
2008
62
0
0
0
33
16
13
0.34
[32]
2009
–
–
–
–
0
5
25
0.92
[29]
2010
–
–
–
–
0
14
16
0.77
[29]
2013
60
0
0
0
0
2
58
0.98
Present study
2014
36
0
0
0
1
6
29
0.89
Present study
2015
58
0
0
0
5
24
29
0.71
Present study
An. gambiae (s.s.)
Abomey
2006
52
16
0
0.12
***
2
8
58
0.91
ns
[6]
2013
47
2
0
0.02
0
0
49
1
Present study
2014
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
Present study
2015
30
1
0
0.02
0
0
31
1
Present study
Avrankou
2013
22
1
0
0.02
–
3
5
15
1
–
Present study
Bembèrèkè
2007
57
5
0
0.04
* (ns)
5
15
42
0.80
ns
[6]
2013
47
0
0
0
0
1
46
0.99
Present study
2014
21
0
0
0
4
0
17
0.81
Present study
2015
19
0
0
0
6
8
5
0.47
Present study
Bohicon
2006
2
1
0
0.17
ns
0
1
3
0.88
ns
[6]
2008
–
–
–
–
3
6
16
0.76
[29]
2009
–
–
–
–
0
4
41
0.96
[29]
2010
–
–
–
–
0
7
26
0.89
[29]
2013
15
0
0
0
0
0
15
1
Present study
2014
14
0
0
0
0
1
13
0.96
Present study
2015
35
0
0
0
0
2
33
0.97
Present study
Comè
2013
4
0
0
0
–
0
0
4
1.00
–
Present study
Covè
2014
1
0
0
0
ns
0
0
1
1.00
ns
Present study
2015
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.00
Present study
Djougou
2007
39
3
0
0.04
ns
1
10
31
0.86
ns
[6]
2013
60
0
0
0
0
3
57
0.98
Present study
2014
55
0
0
0
1
2
52
0.96
Present study
2015
51
4
0
0.04
1
0
54
0.98
Present study
Glazoué
2007
5
0
0
0
ns
4
1
0
0.10
ns
[6]
2013
23
0
0
0
0
0
23
1
Present study
2014
14
1
0
0.03
0
1
14
0.97
Present study
2015
0
1
0
0.50
0
0
1
1
Present study
Kandi
2007
30
0
0
0
ns
7
8
15
0.63
***
[6]
2009
90
3
0
0.02
80
104
90
0.52
[11]
2013
44
0
0
0
3
0
41
0.93
Present study
2014
20
0
0
0
4
0
16
0.80
Present study
2015
58
0
0
0
13
0
45
0.78
Present study
Natitingou
2007
47
1
0
0.01
ns
1
13
47
0.88
***
[6]
2012
–
–
–
–
33
11
0
0.13
[33]
2013
60
0
0
0
0
0
60
1
Present study
2014
46
3
0
0.03
0
0
49
1
Present study
2015
46
12
0
0.10
0
0
58
1
Present study
Tori Bossito
2007
144
2
0
0.01
ns
74
62
10
0.28
***
[32]
2008
71
0
0
0
43
32
32
0.45
[29, 32]
2009
–
–
–
–
0
5
20
0.90
[29]
2010
–
–
–
–
1
5
5
0.68
[29]
2014
20
0
0
0
0
0
20
1
Present study
An. coluzii × An. gambiae (s.s.) hybrids
Abomey
2013
5
0
0
0
–
0
0
5
1
–
Present study
Bohicon
2013
1
0
0
0
–
0
0
1
1
–
Present study
Bembèrèkè
2015
1
0
0
0
–
0
1
0
0.5
–
Present study
Djougou
2015
1
0
0
0
–
0
0
1
1
–
Present study
Tori Bossito
2014
4
0
0
0
–
0
0
4
1
–
Present study
Notes: For each species of the complex, the year of sampling and the number of individuals per genotype are indicated for both resistance mutations, as well as the source of the data. For each resistance mutation, the frequency of the resistant allele is calculated for each sample (f) and the P-value indicates whether there is a significant interannual variation (multinomial log-linear model, Year effect, see “Methods”): ns, P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 (when the Bonferroni correction suggests that the significant P-value is probably a false positive, ns is indicated within brackets). “–” is indicated when no data were available
Frequencies of L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 mutations over ten years (2006–2015) in Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) populations of BeninNotes: For each species of the complex, the year of sampling and the number of individuals per genotype are indicated for both resistance mutations, as well as the source of the data. For each resistance mutation, the frequency of the resistant allele is calculated for each sample (f) and the P-value indicates whether there is a significant interannual variation (multinomial log-linear model, Year effect, see “Methods”): ns, P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 (when the Bonferroni correction suggests that the significant P-value is probably a false positive, ns is indicated within brackets). “–” is indicated when no data were availableThe L1014F-VGSC mutation was found in all three Anopheles species. However, its frequency was relatively low in An. arabiensis (0–0.3, with an average 0.21 ± 0.37, Fig, 3, Table 2), except in Glazoué in 2015, where the frequency was 0.97 (NB: genotype and species were confirmed by Sanger-sequencing three RR individuals). By contrast, the mutation was found in all localities and almost fixed in An. coluzzii and An. gambiae (s.s.), with average frequencies of 0.79 ± 0.27 and 0.93 ± 0.12, respectively (Fig. 3, Table 2). We then analyzed the population genetic structure (using F statistics in the sense of Weir & Cockerham [30]) and found that most populations were not different from a panmictic equilibrium (most F were not statistically different from 0, Table 3), with significant differentiation between populations (F < 0.2), that could reach high values as in 2015 (Table 3).
Fig. 3
L1014F-VGSC genotype frequencies. The cumulated frequencies of SS, RS and RR genotypes are presented for each sample with more than 10 individuals analyzed (N ≥ 10). The locality and year of collection are also indicated (bottom), as well as the number of analyzed individuals (N) and the species (top). “*” indicates that the inter-annual variations are significant (multinomial log-linear model, Year effect, see “Methods”)
Table 3
Population genetics analyses at VGSC and ace-1 locus
Species
Population
ace-1
VGSC
2013
2014
2015
2013
2014
2015
FIS
FIS
FIS
FIS
FIS
FIS
An. arabiensis
Bèmbèrèkè
–
–
–
1
**
–
–
Bohicon
–
–
–
–
–
–
Djougou
–
–
–
–
–
–
Glazoué
–
–
–
–
–
1
***
Kandi
–
–
–
1
***
1
***
–
FST
FST
–
FST
–
FST
–
FST
0.211**
FST
0.011 ns
FST
0.917***
An. coluzzii
Abomey
–
− 0.02
ns
–
–
–
–
Avrankou
− 0.014
ns
–
–
0.432
*
0.195
ns
0.258
ns
Bèmbèrèkè
–
–
–
–
–
− 0.037
ns
Bohicon
–
–
–
0.38
ns
0.357
ns
–
Comè
–
–
–
− 0.019
ns
0.12
ns
− 0.054
ns
Cotonou
–
− 0.03
ns
–
− 0.017
ns
–
0.021
ns
Covè
–
–
–
− 0.097
ns
0.036
ns
0.489
ns
Djougou
–
–
–
–
–
–
Glazoué
–
–
–
–
1
ns
–
Grand-Popo
− 0.051
ns
–
–
− 0.016
ns
− 0.121
ns
0.291
*
Kandi
–
–
–
–
–
−
Tori-Bossito
–
–
–
− 0.009
ns
0.17
ns
0.010
ns
FST
FST
0.033***
FST
0.008 ns
FST
–
FST
0.078***
FST
0.058***
FST
0.165***
An. gambiae (s.s.)
Abomey
− 0.01
ns
–
–
–
–
–
Avrankou
–
–
–
0.421
ns
–
–
Bèmbèrèkè
–
–
–
–
1
***
0.182
ns
Bohicon
–
–
–
–
–
− 0.015
ns
Comè
–
–
–
–
–
–
Covè
–
–
–
–
–
–
Djougou
–
–
− 0.029
ns
− 0.017
ns
0.488
ns
1
**
Glazoué
–
–
–
–
–
–
Kandi
–
–
–
1
ns
1
***
1
***
Natitingou
–
− 0.021
ns
0.036
ns
–
–
–
Tori-Bossito
–
–
–
–
–
–
FST
FST
–
FST
0.002 ns
FST
0.082***
FST
0.119***
FST
0.082**
FST
0.660***
Notes: F is an estimation of deviation from the panmictic equilibrium in each species, each population and each year. F is an estimation of differentiation between populations independently for each year and species (tested using Genepop option 3.3). ns, P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001). “–” is indicated when no data are available
L1014F-VGSC genotype frequencies. The cumulated frequencies of SS, RS and RR genotypes are presented for each sample with more than 10 individuals analyzed (N ≥ 10). The locality and year of collection are also indicated (bottom), as well as the number of analyzed individuals (N) and the species (top). “*” indicates that the inter-annual variations are significant (multinomial log-linear model, Year effect, see “Methods”)Population genetics analyses at VGSC and ace-1 locusNotes: F is an estimation of deviation from the panmictic equilibrium in each species, each population and each year. F is an estimation of differentiation between populations independently for each year and species (tested using Genepop option 3.3). ns, P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001). “–” is indicated when no data are availableThe same samples were also screened for the G119S-ace-1 mutation. A total of 271 An. arabiensis individuals carried the mutation; it was found in some populations for An. coluzzii and An. gambiae (s.s.), only in heterozygotes (Fig. 4). Frequencies were low (between 0–0.1, Table 2) and the mutation was often not detected in overall sampling years in some populations (Fig. 4). Due to the rarity of the mutation, most populations were SS monomorphic, which generally prevented the analysis of the F (Tables 2, 3). Similarly, only low differentiation was found between populations (F < 0.1, Table 3).
Fig. 4
G119S-ace-1 genotype frequencies. The cumulated frequencies of SS, RS and RR genotypes are presented for each sample with more than 10 individuals analyzed (N ≥ 10). The locality and year of collection are also indicated (bottom), as well as the number of analyzed individuals (N) and the species (top) “*” indicates that the inter-annual variations are significant (multinomial log-linear model, Year effect, see “Methods”)
G119S-ace-1 genotype frequencies. The cumulated frequencies of SS, RS and RR genotypes are presented for each sample with more than 10 individuals analyzed (N ≥ 10). The locality and year of collection are also indicated (bottom), as well as the number of analyzed individuals (N) and the species (top) “*” indicates that the inter-annual variations are significant (multinomial log-linear model, Year effect, see “Methods”)
Over ten years in Benin, kdr fluctuated at generally high frequencies, while ace-1 remained rare
Adding data published from 2006 to 2010 in previous studies to the 2013–2015 new data, we analysed the distribution and long-term dynamics of the resistance allele frequencies, L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1.For L1014F-VGSC, multinomial log-linear models showed no significant Pop:Year:Sp interaction (LRT, P-value > 0.05), although all Pop:Year, Pop:Sp or Year:Sp interactions were significant (LRT, P-value < 0.001). We thus analysed the Year effect independently in each species and population (Table 2, Fig. 3). In An. arabiensis, only Glaouzé showed significant variations in resistance allele frequencies over the years, with a sharp increase in 2015 (P-value < 0.001, Table 2); in An. coluzzii, significant variations were found in Cotonou and Tori Bossito (with no clear trend, but slight and recent reductions after years at high frequencies) and tendencies to increase in Bohicon and Comè that did not, however, pass correction for multi-testing; in An. gambiae (s.s.), significant variations were found in Kandi (no clear trend, but a slight and recent reduction after years at high frequencies) and Naititingou and Tori Bossito (increases) (Table 2).For G119S-ace-1, multinomial log-linear models showed no significant Pop:Year:Sp, Pop:Year, Pop:Sp or Year:Sp interactions (LRT, P-value > 0.05). Significant effects were, however, found for the simple factors Pop (LRT, P-value < 0.001), Sp (LRT, P-value < 0.01) and Year (LRT, P-value < 0.05). We again analyzed the Year effect independently in each species and population (Table 2, Fig. 4). Unsurprisingly considering the low mutation frequencies, we found no significant variations in resistance allele frequencies over the years, except in An. gambiae (s.s.) from Abomey, with no clear trend (Table 2).
Discussion
Environmental variations induced by insecticides used against crop pests or vectors pathogens have been a strong selection pressure on vector populations. To understand how it affects these populations over time at both the phenotypic and genotypic levels, we investigated the susceptibility of An. gambiae (s.l.) to insecticides (permethrin and bendiocarb) and the distribution of the resistance target-site mutations (L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1) in different agroclimatic zones, with different insecticide practices, across Benin. Indeed, climate and insecticide usage are key parameters in understanding the evolutionary dynamics of resistance genes.
Pyrethroids resistance is frequent in all vector populations from Benin, driven by vector control and agriculture
One of the key questions of our study was to assess whether the origin of the insecticide pressures impacted the spread of resistance in vector populations from Benin.We showed that all tested An. gambiae (s.l.) populations were consistently and often highly resistant to permethrin over the three consecutive years of our survey (Fig. 2, permethrin), which suggests that these mosquito populations are exposed to strong and pervasive pyrethroid insecticide pressures. Despite the difficulties of gathering information on the local treatment practices, we were able to compare populations exposed mainly to vector control treatments (MVCI) with populations exposed mainly to insecticides used for agriculture. As previous studies in Burkina Faso [2, 11], we found high PYR resistance in both kinds of localities, which strongly suggests that both practices are sources of selective pressure in Benin. There was, however, a high heterogeneity between populations, even under the same kind of treatment practices. This might be linked to the urban-ness or the bioclimate of the localities, although the number of populations investigated remains low and prevents definitive conclusions. We nevertheless found that, at least in 2015, MVCI resulted in significantly higher resistance levels than exposure to agriculture insecticides (Fig. 2).In line with these observations at the phenotypic level, we also found high frequencies of the 1014F-VGSC mutation in the 2263 screened individuals from 13 localities over three years (Table 2, Fig. 3), confirming the tendency observed in previous studies [36] (see Table 2) or more recent years in southern Benin [37]. While the mutation frequency was high (and sometimes fixed) in both dead and survivor mosquitoes after 24 h exposure to permethrin (Additional file 1: Table S1), there were significant differences that tend to confirm the mutation adaptive advantage (Additional file 1: Table S3). Note however, that metabolic insecticide resistance mechanisms (e.g. P450-monooxigenase) have also been shown by previous studies to contribute to pyrethroid resistance in Benin [36, 38].However, we show in this study that the distribution of the mutation in the different species of the An. gambiae (s.l.) complex is heterogeneous: while we found it in An. coluzzii, An. gambiae (s.s.), as well as in An. arabiensis, its frequency was much lower in the latter and higher in An. gambiae than in An. coluzzii (Fig. 3). This probably results from their ecological differences: while An. arabiensis is described as more zoophilic, exophagic and exophilic in savannah and sparse woodland, albeit with a high plasticity depending on the studies, including breeding in rice fields, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae (s.s.) are described as more anthropophilic, endophagic and endophilic (An. gambiae more so than An. coluzzii), again with variations [39, 40]. As such, An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. coluzzii (to a slightly lesser extent) would be more exposed than An. arabiensis to pyrethroids currently used in LLINs campaigns, which could explain the differences in L1014F-VGSC frequencies. Consequently, the higher prevalence of An. arabiensis in most populations exposed only to agriculture insecticides rather than MVCI (ex. Kandi, Glazoué, Bohicon and Bembèrèkè) could explain, at least in part, the higher mortality observed in bioassays (Figs. 2, 3).Our study thus supports the notion that the type of insecticide exposure and the Anopheles species composition interact to explain the observed pyrethroid resistance levels in natural populations.
L1014F-VGSC frequency tends to increase in Benin
To assess the dynamics of pyrethroid resistance, we combined data published in previous studies (2006–2010) [7, 11, 31–35] with the data collected for this study (2013–2015) and analyzed the long-term dynamics of the resistance allele frequency. The number of individuals analyzed was variable (Table 2), particularly when taking the species into account, so that the statistical power of our analyses was not optimal. Consequently, while there seems to be a general trend towards an increase in L1014F-VGSC frequency (Table 2, Fig. 3), we only found significant inter-annual variations for some of the populations, but in all three species (Fig. 3). This trend seems to persist in more recent samples (although the authors give regional rather than population-level data [37]). This persistence at high frequencies, despite its fitness costs, indicates that the resistance allele is still under selection (even if metabolic resistance mechanisms are also present [36, 38]). A similar situation has also been reported in An. gambiae (s.l.) populations from Burkina Faso, where over a ten-year period (between 1999 and 2009), the frequency of L1014F-VGSC mutation increased from 0.2 to 0.8 [41]. In this case, as in a study carried out on vegetable farming sites in southern of Benin [42], indirect evidence suggests that residues of PYRs/OCs in soils might select the L1014F-VGSC mutation, so that agricultural intensification would be one cause for these increases [41]. However, as shown above, vector control interventions are also responsible: a study in Mali indeed suggested that the increasing L1014F-VGSC frequency in An. coluzzii was due to the intensive use of long-lasting insecticidal nets [43]. Our results on the sharp increase in frequency L1014F-VGSC following the distribution of impregnated mosquito nets may reflect the same impact. It is important to note however, that significant decreases were also found in some populations (Table 2, Fig. 3): this shows that, despite the global trends, the local practices, both in agriculture and vector control, can rapidly impact the dynamics of the pyrethroid resistance allele. This heterogeneity in the practices also probably explains the high L1014F-VGSC frequency heterogeneities observed between populations (Additional file 1: Table S1). Overall, our study highlights the finesse of the data required to precisely follow, understand and predict resistance dynamics, but also encourages further investigations to acquire this knowledge as it shows that PYR resistance is not irreversible.Moreover, this increase of PYR resistance mechanism may affect malaria parasite development within An. gambiae (s.l.) and thereby impact on malaria transmission. However, few studies have shown that the resistant vectors carrying L1014F-VGSC mutation increase the prevalence in oocysts and sporozoites development [44-46]. Moreover, studies designed to assess whether resistance has an impact on current vector control tools (LLINs and IRS), have shown the decrease of their effectiveness to kill resistant vectors [47-50]. Consequently, insecticide resistance could potentially maintain residual malaria transmission and jeopardize malaria elimination in many places of sub-Saharan Africa.
Resistance to carbamates and organophosphates remains low in Benin, despite high prevalence in neighbouring countries
From 2013 to 2015, bendiocarb resistance of An. gambiae (s.l.) remained generally low in Benin, with very few localities showing less than 90% mortalities (Abomey, Glazoué and Kandi, Fig. 2, bendiocarb). Although all these localities are mostly exposed to agriculture insecticides rather than MVCI, the nature of insecticide pressures had no statistically significant effect. Note however, that the low resistance levels largely impeded the statistical power of the analyses.Very few An. arabiensis surviving mosquitoes were obtained in bioassays, except in Glazoué and Cotonou and none carried the G119S mutation (Additional file 1: Table S2). This might signal a lack of adjustment for the bendiocarb diagnostic doses used in the WHO susceptibility tests for this species. It could also be due to the presence of metabolic resistance mechanisms like esterases, which have been described in An. gambiae from Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast, or Mayotte Island, Comoros [51-53]. There were only few survivors in bioassays for An. coluzzii and An. gambiae (s.s.) (Additional file 1: Table S2), with a higher, though still low, frequency of the G119S mutation (Fig. 4). Again, most surviving individuals did not carry this mutation, which could indicate the selection of other resistance mechanisms, such as detoxification.When pooling data published in previous studies (2006–2010) with the new ones (2263 samples from 2013 to 2015), we confirmed that, although present in most, the mutation remains very rare in natural populations (Fig. 4) with no apparent geographical structure (Table 3). This is actually surprising as many surrounding countries display much higher G119S frequencies (Fig. 5), with no obvious reasons to explain the differences.
Fig. 5
West-Africa map and G119S ace-1 mutation frequency in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.). Data were extracted from this study (Benin, 0.0095%), Assogba et al. (2018) [56] (Togo, 88.28%), Oduola et al. (2012) [57] (Nigeria, 0%), Essandoh et al. (2013) [58] (Ghana, 16.448%), Alou et al. (2010) [59] (Ivory Coast, 31.25%) and Dabiré et al. (2014) [60] (Burkina Faso, 18.54%)
West-Africa map and G119S ace-1 mutation frequency in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.). Data were extracted from this study (Benin, 0.0095%), Assogba et al. (2018) [56] (Togo, 88.28%), Oduola et al. (2012) [57] (Nigeria, 0%), Essandoh et al. (2013) [58] (Ghana, 16.448%), Alou et al. (2010) [59] (Ivory Coast, 31.25%) and Dabiré et al. (2014) [60] (Burkina Faso, 18.54%)However, these results, high susceptibility and very low frequency of G119S-ace-1 in vector populations, provide strong support for the proposed strategy of using CXs/OPs insecticides as an alternative to PYRs for vector control, at least in Benin. The pervasive and increasing PYR resistance in An. gambiae (s.l.) African populations indeed encouraged a switch from PYRs to CXs/OPs (or mixed applications) in several sub-Saharan African countries to preserve vector control effectiveness, with the support of the American President’s Malaria Initiative [10] and the National Malaria Control Programme (including Benin [54]). While this strategy appears interesting for short- or even medium terms, resistance will eventually spread, as the G119S-ace-1 mutation is already present in vector populations and will be selected. A tight monitoring of the resistance markers is thus mandatory from the start, to prevent as long as possible and then try to limit the spread. Again, our study over ten years shows strong fluctuations, with detection of the mutation in some localities (Fig. 4, Table 2). This again suggests that a smart use of the insecticides could be implemented to moderate the selective pressure to slow the mutation spread and to withdraw insecticides in time to benefit from the selective cost associated with G119S-ace-1 [22, 55]. It will in any case require fine monitoring and anticipation from the different actors involved in vector control, scientists and programme managers, to prevent repeating the previous decisions that led to the PYR resistance situation.
Conclusions
Our results confirm both the high prevalence of PYR resistance and the potential of CXs/OPs as short- to medium term alternatives in Benin. They also underline the need for regular resistance monitoring and informed management in their usage, as the G119S-ace-1 mutation is already present in Benin and surrounding countries. Unwise usage of CXs/OPs would rapidly lead to its spread, which would jeopardize PYR-resistant Anopheles control.Additional file 1: Table S1. L1014F-VGSC allele frequency in survivor and dead Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) after 1-hour exposure to permethrin insecticide. Table S2. G119S-ace-1 allele frequency in survivor and dead of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) after 1-hour exposure to bendiocarb insecticide. Table S3.P-values of Fisherʼs exact tests comparing the phenotypic distributions (i.e. numbers of SS, RS and RR individuals) between dead and surviving mosquitoes for the L1014F-VGSC and G119S-ace-1 mutations, after exposure respectively to permethrin and bendiocarb insecticides. P-values < 0.05 are bolded when still significant after sequential Bonferroni correction, italicized otherwise. NB: only populations where more than one phenotype was found are considered here.
Authors: Ludovic P Ahoua Alou; Alphonsine A Koffi; Maurice A Adja; Emmanuel Tia; Philippe K Kouassi; Moussa Koné; Fabrice Chandre Journal: Malar J Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Martin C Akogbéto; Rock Y Aïkpon; Roseric Azondékon; Gil G Padonou; Razaki A Ossè; Fiacre R Agossa; Raymond Beach; Michel Sèzonlin Journal: Malar J Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Bilali Kabula; Patrick Tungu; Emily J Rippon; Keith Steen; William Kisinza; Stephen Magesa; Franklin Mosha; Martin James Donnelly Journal: Malar J Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Eric R Lucas; Kirk A Rockett; Amy Lynd; John Essandoh; Nelson Grisales; Brigid Kemei; Harun Njoroge; Christina Hubbart; Emily J Rippon; John Morgan; Arjen E Van't Hof; Eric O Ochomo; Dominic P Kwiatkowski; David Weetman; Martin J Donnelly Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Adandé A Medjigbodo; Luc S Djogbenou; Aubin A Koumba; Laurette Djossou; Athanase Badolo; Constantin J Adoha; Guillaume K Ketoh; Jacques F Mavoungou Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 2.278