Literature DB >> 32171140

Comparative life cycle assessment of microalgae cultivation for non-energy purposes using different carbon dioxide sources.

Roberto Porcelli1, Federica Dotto2, Laura Pezzolesi3, Diego Marazza4, Nicolas Greggio5, Serena Righi4.   

Abstract

The ability of microalgae to sequester carbon and at the same time synthesise valuable compounds with potential applications in nutraceutical, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries makes them attractive for commercial deployment, especially in view of a blue bioeconomy. Among microalgae, the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum is considered as an important potential source of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as eicosapentanoic acid, an essential polyunsaturated fatty acid with anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. The aim of this study was to perform the Life Cycle Assessment of the cultivation of P. tricornutum - at semi-industrial scale in photobioreactor - for the production of high-quality bioactive compounds comparing synthetic carbon dioxide supply to a supply with waste carbon dioxide from a biogas upgrading process hypothesizing industrial symbiosis network. The effect of renewable energy use instead of the European electricity mix was also examined. Primary data on the production process, including the stages of cleaning and sterilisation, cultivation, harvesting and freeze-drying, were used. The midpoint impact categories recommended in the ILCD Handbook were used for performing the impact assessment. A sensitivity analysis was also performed on algal productivity, culture medium recirculation factor and amount of solvents per cleaning cycle. Firstly, results indicate in general cultivation and freeze-drying as the most contributing stages to the impacts. Secondly, they demonstrate in the comparative assessment that the use of carbon dioxide from the biogas upgrading is a feasible and attractive alternative to the synthetic one, as it allows for the improvement of the environmental performance of the production process in all the analysed impact categories. Finally, sensitivity analysis suggests that the environmental performance could be further improved by acting on other key factors, such as electricity source, nutrients culture medium and cleaning solutions.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioactive compounds; CO(2) fixation; Environmental assessment; High-value products; Marine microalgae; Waste CO(2)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32171140     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

Review 1.  Health benefits of microalgae and their microbiomes.

Authors:  Ines Krohn; Simon Menanteau-Ledouble; Gunhild Hageskal; Yekaterina Astafyeva; Pierre Jouannais; Jeppe Lund Nielsen; Massimo Pizzol; Alexander Wentzel; Wolfgang R Streit
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Drying Microalgae Using an Industrial Solar Dryer: A Biomass Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Benjamin Schmid; Sofia Navalho; Peter S C Schulze; Simon Van De Walle; Geert Van Royen; Lisa M Schüler; Inês B Maia; Carolina R V Bastos; Marie-Christin Baune; Edwin Januschewski; Ana Coelho; Hugo Pereira; João Varela; João Navalho; Alexandre Miguel Cavaco Rodrigues
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 3.  The limitations of bioeconomy LCA studies for understanding the transition to sustainable bioeconomy.

Authors:  Nishtha Talwar; Nicholas M Holden
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.257

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.