Literature DB >> 32170961

Combined use of cytology, p16 immunostaining and genotyping for triage of women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus at primary screening.

Jack Cuzick1, Rachael Adcock1, Francesca Carozzi2, Anna Gillio-Tos3, Laura De Marco3, Annarosa Del Mistro4, Helena Frayle4, Salvatore Girlando5, Cristina Sani2, Massimo Confortini2, Manuel Zorzi6, Paolo Giorgi-Rossi7, Raffaella Rizzolo8, Guglielmo Ronco8,9.   

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is very sensitive for primary cervical screening but has low specificity. Triage tests that improve specificity but maintain high sensitivity are needed. Women enrolled in the experimental arm of Phase 2 of the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer randomized controlled cervical screening trial were tested for high-risk HPV (hrHPV) and referred to colposcopy if positive. hrHPV-positive women also had HPV genotyping (by polymerase chain reaction with GP5+/GP6+ primers and reverse line blotting), immunostaining for p16 overexpression and cytology. We computed sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for different combinations of tests and determined potential hierarchical ordering of triage tests. A number of 1,091 HPV-positive women had valid tests for cytology, p16 and genotyping. Ninety-two of them had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) histology and 40 of them had CIN grade 3+ (CIN3+) histology. The PPV for CIN2+ was >10% in hrHPV-positive women with positive high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (61.3%), positive low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL+) (18.3%) and positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (14.8%) cytology, p16 positive (16.7%) and, hierarchically, for infections by HPV33, 16, 35, 59, 31 and 52 (in decreasing order). Referral of women positive for either p16 or LSIL+ cytology had 97.8% sensitivity for CIN2+ and women negative for both of these had a 3-year CIN3+ risk of 0.2%. Similar results were seen for women being either p16 or HPV16/33 positive. hrHPV-positive women who were negative for p16 and cytology (LSIL threshold) had a very low CIN3+ rate in the following 3 years. Recalling them after that interval and referring those positive for either test to immediate colposcopy seem to be an efficient triage strategy. The same applies to p16 and HPV16.
© 2020 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPV genotyping; HPV testing; cervical screening; cytology; p16 immunocytochemistry; triage of HPV-positive women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32170961     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  2 in total

1.  DNA methylation testing with S5 for triage of high-risk HPV positive women.

Authors:  Rachael Adcock; Belinda Nedjai; Attila T Lorincz; Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska; Rawinder Banwait; Norah Torrez-Martinez; Michael Robertson; Jack Cuzick; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 7.316

2.  p16/ki67 and E6/E7 mRNA Accuracy and Prognostic Value in Triaging HPV DNA-Positive Women.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Francesca Carozzi; Guglielmo Ronco; Elena Allia; Simonetta Bisanzi; Anna Gillio-Tos; Laura De Marco; Raffaella Rizzolo; Daniela Gustinucci; Annarosa Del Mistro; Helena Frayle; Massimo Confortini; Anna Iossa; Elena Cesarini; Simonetta Bulletti; Basilio Passamonti; Silvia Gori; Laura Toniolo; Alessandra Barca; Laura Bonvicini; Pamela Mancuso; Francesco Venturelli; Maria Benevolo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.