Literature DB >> 32170881

Psychological safety in feedback: What does it look like and how can educators work with learners to foster it?

Christina E Johnson1,2, Jennifer L Keating3, Elizabeth K Molloy2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Feedback conversations play a central role in health professions workplace learning. However, learners face a dilemma: if they engage in productive learning behaviours (such as asking questions, raising difficulties, offering opinions or contesting ideas), they risk exposing their limitations or offending the educator. This highlights the importance of psychological safety in encouraging learners to candidly engage in interactive dialogue and the co-construction of knowledge. Previous research has recommended that building safety, trust or an educational alliance is key to productive feedback encounters. Yet it is unclear how to translate this into practice. Hence our research question was: What does psychological safety look like in workplace feedback and how can educators work with learners to foster it?
METHODS: We analysed 36 videos of routine formal feedback episodes in clinical practice involving diverse health professionals. A psychologically safe learning environment was inferred when learners progressively disclosed information and engaged in productive learning behaviours during the conversation. We used thematic analysis to identify associated educator strategies, which seemed to promote psychological safety.
RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (a) setting the scene for dialogue and candour; (b) educator as ally; (c) a continuing improvement orientation, and (d) encouraging interactive dialogue. Educators approaches captured within these themes, seemed to foster a psychologically safe environment by conveying a focus on learning, and demonstrating respect and support to learners.
CONCLUSIONS: This study builds on claims regarding the importance of psychological safety in feedback by clarifying what psychological safety in workplace feedback conversations might look like and identifying associated educator approaches. The results may offer educators practical ways they could work with learners to encourage candid dialogue focused on improving performance.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32170881     DOI: 10.1111/medu.14154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  5 in total

1.  Effects of Longitudinal Coaching on Relationships and Feedback Processes in Pediatric Subspecialty Fellowships-An Interpretive Description Study.

Authors:  Priya G Jain; Mary E McBride; Anne Caliendo; Walter Eppich
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-08

2.  Growth, Engagement, and Belonging in the Clinical Learning Environment: the Role of Psychological Safety and the Work Ahead.

Authors:  Adelaide H McClintock; Tyra Fainstad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 3.  Emotion as reflexive practice: A new discourse for feedback practice and research.

Authors:  Rola Ajjawi; Rebecca E Olson; Nancy McNaughton
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.647

4.  Teaching the technical performance of bronchoscopy to residents in a step-wise simulated approach: factors supporting learning and impacts on clinical work - a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Anne Kathrin Eickelmann; Noemi Jelena Waldner; Sören Huwendiek
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review.

Authors:  Henrik Andersson; Anders Svensson; Catharina Frank; Andreas Rantala; Mats Holmberg; Anders Bremer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.