| Literature DB >> 32170596 |
Li Shi1,2, Liang Zhou3, Juan Liu4, Yang Ding3, Xin-Hua Ye3, Jin-Luo Cheng5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Different types of ketosis-prone obese diabetic patients are seen in the clinic. At present, the mechanism responsible for ketosis onset in these patients remains unclear, and we do not know how these patients should be optimally treated to prevent recurrent ketosis. Therefore, this study aims to investigate risk factors of ketosis in obese ketosis-prone diabetic (OB-KPD) patients.Entities:
Keywords: Free fatty acids; Insulin sensitivity index; Ketosis-prone diabetes; Obesity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32170596 PMCID: PMC7136370 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00800-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Ther ISSN: 1869-6961 Impact factor: 2.945
Fig. 1A stepwise method for the introduction of basal-bolus insulin dose adjustment during follow-up. At discharge, the treatment is a basal bolus regimen (insulin glargine once daily and prandial pre-meal insulin aspart). After discharge, the insulin dose is adjusted according to the SMBG results and the above algorithm
Fig. 2Enrollment process and follow-up of study subjects
Comparison of general information between the two groups
| OB-KPD | OB-T2DM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 40 | 20 | ||
| Age (years) | 33.20 ± 9.12 | 40.50 ± 11.42 | 2.68 | 0.01 |
| Gender (male/female) | 34/6 | 13/7 | 3.14 | 0.10 |
| Family history (yes/no) | 23/17 | 14/6 | 0.88 | 0.41 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 134.82 ± 13.57 | 132.75 ± 18.69 | 0.49 | 0.63 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 84.30 ± 11.36 | 86.65 ± 10.73 | − 0.77 | 0.45 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 30.33 ± 2.00 | 31.02 ± 1.85 | − 1.30 | 0.20 |
Comparison of blood glucose, blood lipids and FFA between the two groups
| OB-KPD | OB-T2DM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPG (mmol/l) | 12.05 ± 3.02 | 9.84 ± 1.65 | 3.67 | 0.00 |
| HbA1c (%) | 12.58 ± 1.95 | 9.33 ± 1.50 | 7.14 | 0.00 |
| TCH (mmol/l) | 5.22 ± 1.23 | 5.01 ± 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.40 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 2.64 (1.71, 3.69) | 2.11(1.55, 4.61) | − 0.59 | 0.56 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.97 ± 0.99 | 3.02 ± 0.64 | − 0.17 | 0.86 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.94 ± 0.25 | 1.05 ± 0.32 | − 1.49 | 0.14 |
| FFA (umol/l) | 1156.18 ± 371.88 | 649.38 ± 149.92 | 7.49 | 0.00 |
| β-HB (umol/l) | 1700.58 ± 1379.52 | 250.65 ± 111.37 | 6.60 | 0.00 |
Comparison of islet β-cell function and insulin sensitivity between the two groups at enrollment
| OB-KPD | OB-T2DM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUCGLU | 80.44 ± 14.72 | 72.35 ± 6.29 | 2.98 | 0.00 |
| AUCC-P | 9.06 ± 4.09 | 20.99 ± 11.14 | − 4.64 | 0.00 |
| ISI | 2.43 ± 0.68 | 2.86 ± 0.72 | − 2.24 | 0.03 |
Comparison of the relevant indicators in the OB-KPD group at the time of enrollment and 1 year later
| At enrollment | One year later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPG (mmol/l) | 11.97 ± 3.01 | 6.88 ± 1.66 | 10.08 | 0.00 |
| HbA1c (%) | 12.75 ± 1.87 | 7.09 ± 1.04 | 13.16 | 0.00 |
| AUCGLU | 81.14 ± 15.47 | 54.31 ± 10.77 | 8.55 | 0.00 |
| TCH (mmol/l) | 5.26 ± 1.36 | 4.47 ± 0.93 | 2.56 | 0.02 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 2.46 (1.75, 3.81) | 1.99 (1.29, 2.34) | − 2.40 | 0.02 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.86 ± 1.14 | 2.62 ± 0.73 | 0.90 | 0.38 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.92 ± 0.22 | 1.01 ± 0.15 | − 2.55 | 0.02 |
| FFA (umol/l) | 1171.08 ± 425.77 | 950.80 ± 261.13 | 3.36 | 0.00 |
| AUCC-P | 7.95 ± 2.79 | 16.38 ± 7.65 | − 5.43 | 0.00 |
| ISI | 2.39 ± 0.73 | 2.93 ± 0.55 | − 4.30 | 0.00 |
| Body weight (kg) | 92.29 ± 10.02 | 90.46 ± 8.46 | 1.86 | 0.08 |
Correlation analysis of β-HB
| HbA1c | TCH | TG | HDL-C | FFA | AUCc-p | ISI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-HB | |||||||
| | 0.71 | 0.28 | 0.62 | 0.1 | 0.69 | − 0.64 | − 0.60 |
| | 0 | 0.08 | 0 | 0.54 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Correlation analysis of AUCC-P with HbA1c, TG, FFA and ISI
| HbA1c | TG | FFA | ISI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUCC-P | ||||
| | − 0.61 | − 0.37 | − 0.48 | − 0.26 |
| | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.11 |
Effect of islet β-cell function on whether insulin discontinuation could be performed after improving the condition in the OB-KPD group
| Whether insulin treatment can be discontinued after ketosis is improved | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ||
| Islet β-cell function | |||
| Absence group | 2 | 3 | 0.02 |
| Presence group | 0 | 26 | |
Body weight changes of subjects in the OB-KPD group during 1-year follow-up
| Non-recurrent group (24 patients) | Recurrent group (5 patients) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before enrollment | After enrollment | Before enrollment | After enrollment | |||||
| Body weight (kg) | 92.29 ± 10.02 | 90.46 ± 8.47 | 1.86 | 0.08 | 88.00 ± 6.82 | 91.80 ± 8.64 | − 3.41 | 0.03 |
|
|
| Different types of ketosis-prone obese diabetic patients are seen in the clinic. At present, the mechanism responsible for ketosis onset in these patients remains unclear. |
| We do not know how these patients should be optimally treated to prevent recurrent ketosis. |
|
|
| The occurrence of ketosis in ketosis-prone obese diabetic patients may be related to glucose and lipid metabolism disorders, increased insulin resistance and decreased islet β-cell secretory functions. |
| We recommend that treatment of obese ketosis-prone diabetes should be focused on the control of blood glucose, blood lipid and body weight values after correcting for ketosis, with the intention of preventing the recurrence of ketosis. |