Geraldine J Ooi1,2, Andrew Clouston3,4,5, Yazmin Johari6,7, William W Kemp8, Stuart K Roberts8, Wendy A Brown6,7, Paul R Burton6,7. 1. Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Prahran, Melbourne, Australia. geraldine.ooi@monash.edu. 2. Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. geraldine.ooi@monash.edu. 3. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 5. Envoi Specialist Pathology, Brisbane, Australia. 6. Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Prahran, Melbourne, Australia. 7. Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 8. Department of Gastroenterology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for characterizing and evaluating treatment response in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Liver heterogeneity and sampling variability can affect the reliability of results. This study aimed to compare histological variability of intraoperative wedge and core liver biopsies from different lobes in bariatric patients, to better inform surgeons on biopsy method and guide interpretation of results. METHODS: We prospectively recruited bariatric surgical patients. Intraoperative core biopsies were taken from the left and right lobe, with a wedge biopsy taken from the left. All biopsies were graded by a specialist liver pathologist, blinded to clinical details and biopsy site. Concordance of histological findings between sites was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 91 participants (72.2% female), mean age 46.8 ± 12.0 years, body mass index 45.9 ± 9.4 kg/m2. There was no significant pattern for up- or down-grading disease dependent on biopsy technique. Moderate to strong agreement was seen in the presence of NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, κ = 0.609-0.865, p < 0.001) between biopsy sites. Individual components (steatosis, inflammation, ballooning) showed weaker agreement (κ = 0.386-0.656, p < 0.01). Fibrosis showed particularly poor agreement (κ = 0.223-0.496, p < 0.01). Detection of pathology improved with a combination of biopsy techniques, compared to a single biopsy method. CONCLUSION: Overall diagnosis of NAFLD or NASH shows good agreement between biopsy sites, but individual components, particularly fibrosis stage, vary significantly. Clinicians should consider biopsies from varied sites, to better assess liver disease severity. These data have important implications in fibrosis assessment of NAFLD and are relevant in the interpretation of histological efficacy of investigational pharmacotherapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000875505 (Australian Clinical Trials Register).
BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for characterizing and evaluating treatment response in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Liver heterogeneity and sampling variability can affect the reliability of results. This study aimed to compare histological variability of intraoperative wedge and core liver biopsies from different lobes in bariatric patients, to better inform surgeons on biopsy method and guide interpretation of results. METHODS: We prospectively recruited bariatric surgical patients. Intraoperative core biopsies were taken from the left and right lobe, with a wedge biopsy taken from the left. All biopsies were graded by a specialist liver pathologist, blinded to clinical details and biopsy site. Concordance of histological findings between sites was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 91 participants (72.2% female), mean age 46.8 ± 12.0 years, body mass index 45.9 ± 9.4 kg/m2. There was no significant pattern for up- or down-grading disease dependent on biopsy technique. Moderate to strong agreement was seen in the presence of NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, κ = 0.609-0.865, p < 0.001) between biopsy sites. Individual components (steatosis, inflammation, ballooning) showed weaker agreement (κ = 0.386-0.656, p < 0.01). Fibrosis showed particularly poor agreement (κ = 0.223-0.496, p < 0.01). Detection of pathology improved with a combination of biopsy techniques, compared to a single biopsy method. CONCLUSION: Overall diagnosis of NAFLD or NASH shows good agreement between biopsy sites, but individual components, particularly fibrosis stage, vary significantly. Clinicians should consider biopsies from varied sites, to better assess liver disease severity. These data have important implications in fibrosis assessment of NAFLD and are relevant in the interpretation of histological efficacy of investigational pharmacotherapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000875505 (Australian Clinical Trials Register).
Authors: Magdalene K Montgomery; Jacqueline Bayliss; Shuai Nie; William De Nardo; Stacey N Keenan; Paula M Miotto; Hamzeh Karimkhanloo; Cheng Huang; Ralf B Schittenhelm; Anthony S Don; Andrew Ryan; Nicholas A Williamson; Geraldine J Ooi; Wendy A Brown; Paul R Burton; Benjamin L Parker; Matthew J Watt Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 14.919