| Literature DB >> 32170188 |
Hui Zhang1, Yinhua Jiang2, Mingwei Song3, Jiajun He4, Dongsheng Guan5.
Abstract
Surveying the quality and quantity of carbon stock in litter layer and woody debris of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations is critical in understanding their carbon pools. Here, the focus of the present study was on a number of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations of different stand aged in the Pearl River Delta region of southern China. The plantation type proved to be a crucial driver of the carbon concentration in litter layer and woody debris, with Acacia exhibiting a superior ability to Eucalyptus to accumulate carbon with stand age in both these materials. The relative contribution of the litter layer and woody debris to the carbon stock of the ecosystem was also significantly higher under mature Acacia (8% and 7%, respectively) than that under mature Eucalyptus (4% and 1%, respectively). Most of the carbon stock within the litter layer was present in the leaf debris. The carbon stock in woody debris was mainly contained in the components within the 10-20 cm diameter class during the primary decay stage, represented as snags in middle-aged and mature Acacia, and as logs for mature Eucalyptus, respectively. The results indicate that both plantation type and stand age influence the characteristics of carbon stored in litter layer and woody debris significantly.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32170188 PMCID: PMC7069954 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61476-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The basic characteristics in the experimental forest stands.
| No. | Latitude | Longitude | Constructive Species | Stand age (a) | Mean DBH (cm) | Mean tree height (m) | Stand density (trees·hm−2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N.23°11′ | E.113°22′ | 18.0 | 17.8 ± 13.1 | 19.4 ± 6.8 | 933.3 | |
| 2 | N.23°11′ | E.113°22′ | 4.0 | 8.7 ± 4.0 | 12.0 ± 3.9 | 2777.8 | |
| 3 | N.23°18′ | E.113°23′ | 16.0 | 15.2 ± 15.3 | 16.9 ± 4.6 | 1344.4 | |
| 4 | N.22°57′ | E.113°18′ | 8.0 | 12.3 ± 5.9 | 14.9 ± 3.4 | 1600.0 | |
| 5 | N.23°18′ | E.113°25′ | 11.0 | 13.6 ± 4.2 | 14.8 ± 3.9 | 1744.4 | |
| 6 | N.22°21′ | E.113°34′ | 1.5 | 6.1 ± 3.2 | 7.1 ± 2.6 | 2866.7 | |
| 7 | N.23°11′ | E.113°23′ | 2.5 | 7.8 ± 4.0 | 10.0 ± 3.9 | 2622.2 | |
| 8 | N.22°21′ | E.113°34′ | 6.0 | 11.3 ± 4.9 | 14.7 ± 3.0 | 1653.3 | |
| 9 | N.22°40′ | E.112°54′ | 1.0 | 5.9 ± 2.5 | 5.1 ± 2.9 | 2777.8 | |
| 10 | N.22°40′ | E.113°54′ | 25.0 | 12.2 ± 4.7 | 20.3 ± 3.1 | 1822.2 | |
| 11 | N.22°40′ | E.112°54′ | 10.0 | 12.3 ± 4.9 | 14.2 ± 3.5 | 1877.8 | |
| 12 | N.23°40′ | E.113°25′ | 12.0 | 12.6 ± 8.4 | 9.7 ± 4.2 | 1111.1 | |
| 13 | N.23°18′ | E.113°25′ | 17.0 | 17.8 ± 8.9 | 13.6 ± 3.9 | 816.7 | |
| 14 | N.23°18′ | E.113°23′ | 5.5 | 9.1 ± 7.8 | 7.1 ± 2.0 | 1544.4 | |
| 15 | N.23°18′ | E.113°23′ | 4.5 | 8.9 ± 4.4 | 7.0 ± 2.4 | 1555.6 | |
| 16 | N.22°21′ | E.113°34′ | 15.0 | 14.7 ± 7.8 | 11.9 ± 4.6 | 1200.0 | |
| 17 | N.22°21′ | E.113°34′ | 13.0 | 12.2 ± 5.0 | 9.5 ± 3.7 | 1222.2 | |
| 18 | N.22°20′ | E.113°34′ | 8.0 | 10.2 ± 4.7 | 8.2 ± 2.7 | 1444.4 | |
| 19 | N.22°40′ | E.112°53′ | 26.0 | 20.7 ± 10.2 | 16.1 ± 4.4 | 833.3 | |
| 20 | N.22°40′ | E.112°54′ | 5.0 | 8.1 ± 2.8 | 7.1 ± 1.4 | 1522.2 | |
| 21 | N.22°41′ | E.112°53′ | 18.0 | 17.7 ± 6.2 | 15.0 ± 2.2 | 840.0 |
Note: Values given as mean ± SD.
The C concentration in the various component of litter layer and woody debris for Acacia and Eucalyptus plantations (%).
| Type | Period | Leaf | Brach | Bark | Fruit | Litter layer | Snags | logs | woody debris |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | 46.13 ± 0.89 | 44.22 ± 3.86 | 41.45 ± 1.24 | 42.20 ± 4.06 | 45.03 ± 1.54 | — | — | — | |
| Middle-aged | 44.18 ± 1.82 | 42.91 ± 2.00 | 39.91 ± 2.09 | 43.31 ± 2.38 | 43.26 ± 1.78 | 46.54 ± 2.92 | 45.72 ± 1.68 | 46.02 ± 2.23 | |
| Mature | 47.29 ± 3.00 | 42.82 ± 1.61 | 43.05 ± 2.22 | 40.59 ± 0.69 | 45.27 ± 1.86 | 47.11 ± 1.10 | 44.80 ± 0.83 | 45.48 ± 1.07 | |
| Young | 47.58 ± 0.91 | 46.36 ± 1.38 | 43.31 ± 0.56 | 44.11 ± 1.22 | 47.25 ± 0.56 | 47.40 ± 1.92 | 47.55 ± 1.30 | 47.52 ± 1.37 | |
| Middle-aged | 49.33 ± 3.30 | 49.60 ± 2.58 | 42.79 ± 1.71 | 45.32 ± 1.50 | 49.09 ± 2.67 | 50.25 ± 2.13 | 46.87 ± 1.83 | 49.30 ± 1.58 | |
| Mature | 49.21 ± 2.28 | 46.91 ± 4.04 | 42.36 ± 0.87 | 43.44 ± 2.84 | 48.60 ± 2.61 | 51.03 ± 1.56 | 47.95 ± 1.20 | 49.96 ± 0.84 | |
| Forest types | ** | ** | ns | * | ** | * | * | ** | |
Note: — means no statistic data, ns denotes not significant, while * and ** represent significant differences at P < 0.05 level and extremely significant difference at P <0.01 level between the Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations, respectively, same as blow.
The C stored in the various component of litter layer and woody debris of Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations (t·ha−1).
| Type | Period | Leaf | Brach | Bark | Fruit | Litter layer | Snags | logs | WD | C stock of ecosystem |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | 0.49 ± 0.14Aa | 0.29 ± 0.26a | 0.05 ± 0.04a | 0.08 ± 0.07a | 0.91 ± 0.40A | — | — | — | 29.75 ± 17.42a | |
| Middle-aged | 1.37 ± 0.43a | 1.26 ± 0.75b | 0.22 ± 0.11ab | 0.12 ± 0.08a | 2.97 ± 0.66Ba | 0.40 ± 0.20 | 0.18 ± 0.14 | 0.58 ± 0.23 | 75.67 ± 12.44b | |
| Mature | 2.73 ± 1.02Bb | 1.07 ± 0.20ab | 0.39 ± 0.32b | 0.16 ± 0.14a | 4.34 ± 0.63Bb | 0.46 ± 0.36 | 0.75 ± 0.06 | 1.21 ± 0.30 | 103.16 ± 3.69c | |
| Young | 1.55 ± 0.09Aa | 0.28 ± 0.06Aa | 0.05 ± 0.01a | 0.02 ± 0.02a | 1.91 ± 0.17A | 0.10 ± 0.05A | 0.33 ± 0.10a | 0.43 ± 0.13A | 43.84 ± 2.70a | |
| Middle-aged | 3.42 ± 0.78Ab | 2.04 ± 0.48Bb | 0.15 ± 0.09ab | 0.11 ± 0.05b | 5.73 ± 1.12Ba | 2.76 ± 1.04Ba | 1.80 ± 1.33ab | 4.56 ± 1.11B | 70.53 ± 13.02b | |
| Mature | 5.83 ± 1.21B | 1.43 ± 0.68Ab | 0.22 ± 0.06b | 0.09 ± 0.07ab | 7.57 ± 0.95Bb | 3.94 ± 1.01Ba | 2.74 ± 1.30b | 6.68 ± 0.38C | 94.47 ± 11.95c | |
| Forest types | ** | ns | ns | ns | * | ** | ** | ** | ns | |
Note: Values are shown as mean ± SD; different lower case (P < 0.05) and upper case (P < 0.01) letters within a column indicate a significant difference between the various ages of a given forest type; for instance, for C stored in leaf in Acacia plantations, the only significant difference (P < 0.05) was presented between young plantations and middle-aged plantations, while an extremely difference (P < 0.01) was observed between young plantations and mature plantations; ns: not significant, *significant difference (P < 0.05), **extremely significant difference (P < 0.01) between the Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations. The C stock of the ecosystem was obtained by multiplying the mass of each component by its C concentration. Thus, the ecosystem’s C stock represents the sum of the C stock of the canopy layer, the understory layer, the litter layer and the woody debris.
C stored in the woody debris classified by the various diameter class in Acacia and Eucalyptus plantations of different stand age (t·ha−1).
| Type | Period | 2.5~10 cm | 10~20 cm | 20~30 cm | >30 cm | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snags | Logs | Total | Snags | Logs | Total | Snags | Logs | Total | Snags | Logs | Total | ||
| Young | 0a | 0Aa | 0Aa | 0a | 0Aa | 0A | 0a | 0Aa | 0Aa | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| Middle-aged | 0.117 ± 0.11b | 0.050 ± 0.11Bb | 0.167 ± 0.15ABb | 0.199 ± 0.11b | 0.116 ± 0.09Ab | 0.314 ± 0.12Ba | 0.085 ± 0.09a | 0.014 ± 0.01Aa | 0.098 ± 0.09ABa | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | |
| Mature | 0.051 ± 0.01ab | 0.158 ± 0.05Bc | 0.210 ± 0.03Bb | 0.202 ± 0.13b | 0.405 ± 0.07Bc | 0.606 ± 0.13Bb | 0.157 ± 0.17a | 0.124 ± 0.08Bb | 0.280 ± 0.12Bb | 0.047 ± 0.05b | 0.064 ± 0.06b | 0.111 ± 0.10b | |
| Young | 0.044 ± 0.04a | 0.213 ± 0.12a | 0.256 ± 0.15a | 0.056 ± 0.03a | 0.117 ± 0.04a | 0.174 ± 0.07Aa | 0a | 0a | 0Aa | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| Middle-aged | 0.210 ± 0.15a | 1.232 ± 1.44a | 1.442 ± 1.35a | 1.183 ± 0.87ab | 0.334 ± 0.15a | 1.518 ± 0.73ab | 0.813 ± 0.99ab | 0.220 ± 0.39a | 1.033 ± 0.96ab | 0.556 ± 0.69a | 0.012 ± 0.02a | 0.568 ± 0.69a | |
| Mature | 0.125 ± 0.06a | 0.941 ± 0.43a | 1.067 ± 0.45a | 1.994 ± 1.04b | 1.069 ± 1.46a | 3.063 ± 1.52Bb | 1.420 ± 0.58b | 0.500 ± 0.06a | 1.920 ± 0.62Bb | 0.407 ± 0.31a | 0.223 ± 0.39a | 0.630 ± 0.40a | |
| Forest types | ns | * | ** | ** | ns | ** | * | * | ** | * | ns | * | |
Note: Values are shown as mean ± SD; different lower case (P < 0.05) and upper case (P < 0.01) letters within a column indicate a significant difference between the various ages of a given forest type; ns: not significant, *significant difference (P < 0.05), **extremely significant difference (P < 0.01) between the Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations.
Characteristics of woody debris at different decay classes in the forest ecosystem.
| Item | Primary | Intermediate | Advanced | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V | |
| Leaf | Present | Disappear | Disappear | Disappear | Disappear |
| Bark | Intact, tight | Intact on the whole, tight | Partly present, loose | Trace present, loose | Disappear |
| Branch | Twigs less than 3cm present, Branches keep intact | Twigs less than 3cm partly present, Branches keep intact | Absent of twigs, Branches present, but mostly broken | Absent of twigs, Branches partly present | Disappear |
| Wood consistency and color | Solid, original color | Solid, original color | Semi-solid, faded | Party solid, breakable | Soft, powdery |
| Moss or fungi | Disappear | Cover less than 25% of surface area | Cover 25%~50% of surface area | Cover more than 50% of surface area | Cover more than 50% of surface area |
| Root invading | Disappear | Disappear | Disappear | In sapwood | In heartwood |
Note: Data is from Tang and Zhou[30].
The C stock in woody debris across various decay classes and plantation ages (t·ha−1).
| Item | Primary | Intermediate | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||||||||||
| Snags | logs | woody debris | Snags | logs | woody debris | Snags | logs | woody debris | Snags | logs | woody debris | ||
| Young | 0Aa | 0Aa | 0Aa | 0a | 0Aa | 0A | 0a | 0Aa | 0Aa | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| Middle-aged | 0.199 ± 0.10Bb | 0.064 ± 0.05AB | 0.263 ± 0.10Bb | 0.177 ± 0.09b | 0.100 ± 0.08Aa | 0.277 ± 0.89B | 0.024 ± 0.03ab | 0.016 ± 0.03Aa | 0.040 ± 0.05Aa | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| Mature | 0.142 ± 0.10Aa | 0.195 ± 0.05Bc | 0.337 ± 0.14Bb | 0.191 ± 0.13b | 0.301 ± 0.08Bb | 0.491 ± 0.04C | 0.124 ± 0.13b | 0.227 ± 0.07Bb | 0.351 ± 0.09Bb | 0a | 0.028 ± 0.05a | 0.028 ± 0.05a | |
| Young | 0.057 ± 0.03Aa | 0.124 ± 0.01a | 0.181 ± 0.04Aa | 0.043 ± 0.02Aa | 0.206 ± 0.09a | 0.249 ± 0.10a | 0a | 0a | 0Aa | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
| Middle-aged | 1.207 ± 0.56Bb | 0.693 ± 0.49a | 1.901 ± 0.65Bb | 1.032 ± 0.43ab | 0.542 ± 0.42a | 1.575 ± 0.45ab | 0.523 ± 0.74a | 0.523 ± 0.58ab | 1.046 ± 0.87ABa | 0a | 0.039 ± 0.08a | 0.039 ± 0.08a | |
| Mature | 1.01 ± 0.37ABb | 0.346 ± 0.30a | 1.358 ± 0.65ABb | 2.084 ± 1.11Bb | 0.354 ± 0.37a | 2.44 ± 1.48b | 0.803 ± 0.40a | 1.500 ± 1.14b | 2.303 ± 0.74Bb | 0.047 ± 0.08a | 0.533 ± 0.50b | 0.580 ± 0.57a | |
| Forest types | ** | * | ** | ** | * | ** | * | * | ** | ns | ns | ns | |
Note: Values shown as mean ± SD; different lower case (P < 0.05) and upper case (P < 0.01) letters within a column indicate a significant difference between the various ages of a given plantation type; ns: not significant, *: significant difference (P < 0.05), **: extremely significant difference (P < 0.01) between the Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations.
The C stock of the litter layer from the other types of broad-leaved forests (t·ha−1).
| Item | Forest Type | Stand age (a) | Mean Value (Standard Error) | References and description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest floor litter | 19 | 1.88 (0.28) | ||
| 19 | 3.74 (0.23) | |||
| 19 | 4.57 (0.15) | |||
| Litter layer | — | 3.21 | ||
| — | 4.25~5.57 |
Note: — indicates data unavailable or no data.
The C stock in the woody debris from other types of broad-leaved forests (t·ha−1).
| Item (Diameter) | Forest Type | The given year (stand age) | Mean Value (Standard Error) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wood debris >5 cm | 19 | 7.1 (0.39) | [ | |
| 19 | 0.34 (0.06) | |||
| 19 | 0.45 (0.04) | |||
| 19 | 0.33 (0.15) | |||
| woody debris (>=10 cm) | Young forests | <40 | 2.86 (0.48) | [ |
| Middle-aged forests | 60–100 | 5.75 (1.65) | ||
| Mature forests | >150 | 11.37 (0.20) | ||
| woody debris (>=10 cm) | Old evergreen broad-leaved forests | 1992 | 7.64 | [ |
| 1994 | 9.56 | |||
| 1999 | 11.09 | |||
| 2004 | 11.36 | |||
| 2008 | 19.66 | |||
| woody debris (>=2 cm) | Mixed | 2009 | 44.3 | [ |
| woody debris (>=10 cm) | Primary forests | 2007 | 31.61 | [ |
Note: The given year represents the estimated year.
The C stock of the woody debris and litter layer in subtropical broad-leaved forests (t·ha−1).
| Ages periods | woody debris/ Litter (mean value (SE)) | Ecosystem C stock | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Litter | woody debris | |||
| Young forests | 2.12 (0.26) | 2.86 (0.48) | 5.11 | Reference[ |
| Middle-aged forests | 2.45 (0.30) | 5.75 (1.65) | 116.62 | |
| Mature forests | 2.64 (0.31) | 11.37 (0.20) | 176.23 | |
| Young forests | 2.13 | 1.92 | 31.96 | [ |
| Middle-aged forests | 3.16 | 5.52 | 95.23 | |
| Mature forests | 4.37 | 8.78 | 194.28 | |
Note:This was the basic data used for the calculation of the proportional contribution to the ecosystem C stock of the woody debris and the litter layer in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests. SE: standard error of the mean; ecosystem biomass C stock: the sum of C stored in the arbor layer, shrub, herb, litter layer and woody debris; diameter of woody debris: ≥10 cm.
Figure 1The relationship between the total biomass and the C stock in the litter layer (and its various components) in Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations.
Figure 2The relationship between the total biomass and the C stock in the woody debris (and its various components) in Eucalyptus and Acacia plantations.