| Literature DB >> 32170023 |
Eric A Muller1,2,3, Thomas P Gray4,2,3, Zhou Zhou5, Xinbin Cheng5, Omar Khatib4,2,3,6, Hans A Bechtel6, Markus B Raschke1,2,3.
Abstract
Much of the electronic transport, photophysical, or biological functions of molecular materials emerge from intermolecular interactions and associated nanoscale structure and morphology. However, competing phases, defects, and disorder give rise to confinement and many-body localization of the associated wavefunction, disturbing the performance of the material. Here, we employ vibrational excitons as a sensitive local probe of intermolecular coupling in hyperspectral infrared scattering scanning near-field optical microscopy (IR s-SNOM) with complementary small-angle X-ray scattering to map multiscale structure from molecular coupling to long-range order. In the model organic electronic material octaethyl porphyrin ruthenium(II) carbonyl (RuOEP), we observe the evolution of competing ordered and disordered phases, in nucleation, growth, and ripening of porphyrin nanocrystals. From measurement of vibrational exciton delocalization, we identify coexistence of ordered and disordered phases in RuOEP that extend down to the molecular scale. Even when reaching a high degree of macroscopic crystallinity, identify significant local disorder with correlation lengths of only a few nanometers. This minimally invasive approach of vibrational exciton nanospectroscopy and -imaging is generally applicable to provide the molecular-level insight into photoresponse and energy transport in organic photovoltaics, electronics, or proteins.Entities:
Keywords: infrared spectroscopy; molecular energy transport; molecular vibrations; scattering-scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM); vibrational exciton
Year: 2020 PMID: 32170023 PMCID: PMC7132254 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1914172117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.(A) Schematic of broadband nano-FTIR s-SNOM. MCT, mercury, cadmium, telluride. (B) Molecular structure of RuOEP. (C) Broadband SINS reference spectrum of pure RuOEP with 1,931-cm−1 metal carbonyl stretching mode and 1,350- to 1,600-cm−1 weaker aromatic modes indicated in arbitrary units (arb. u.). (D) Schematic of vibrational nanospectroscopy imaging of both weakly coupled RuOEP molecules (right) and strongly coupled RuOEP crystalline domains within RuOEP nanocrystals (left).
Fig. 2.(A) FTIR reflectance spectra of RuOEP metal carbonyl as a function of solvent annealing after 0-min (blue), 10-min (green), 20-min (orange), and 60-min (red) chloroform vapor exposure with corresponding fits (dashed). (B) Schematic showing dipole coupling between neighboring molecules (green and blue arrows) inducing peak splitting of carbonyl stretch into and for in-phase and out-of-phase interactions, respectively. (C) Representative near-field s-SNOM spectrum from within individual RuOEP nanocrystals after 10-min vapor annealing (green) and after 60-min annealing (red). (D–F) Evolution of morphology from AFM height images of RuOEP–P3HT blend measured as a function of solvent annealing after 0-min (D), 20-min (E), and 150-min (F) vapor exposure.
Fig. 3.(A) Nanoscale map of derived from fits of the voxel array at an intermediate stage of RuOEP aggregate formation. (B) Representative spectra and fits for locations indicated in A. (C) Corresponding 3D surface plot of over the region in A. (D–F) Nanoscale map of crystallinity as determined by Eq. and fits to the voxel arrays measured at an intermediate stage of RuOEP aggregate formation (D), with representative fits shown in E and corresponding interpolated 3D surface plots of crystallinity shown in F.
Fig. 4.(A) Nanoscale map of measured with 20-nm grid spacing for a RuOEP aggregate with high crystallinity. (B) Representative spectra and fits for locations indicated in A. (C) Corresponding 3D surface plot of over the region in A.
Fig. 5.(A) IR s-SNOM spectra measured at four locations within RuOEP nanocrystals showing spectral shifts of . (B) Histogram of peak center versus for voxel arrays from multiple RuOEP nanocrystals within the same sample. Max, maximum; min, minimum. (C) Vibrational exciton model calculation with splitting of and as a function of aggregate size for several models: (blue), (red), (green), and (black). (D) Nanoimaging of crystalline domain size. Overlay shows delocalization length as determined by spectral shifts of the vibrational exciton spectra, measured with 20-nm grid spacing, with topography shown in the background. (E) Schematic of phase segregation during solvent annealing. Initially, seed crystals form and increase in size, followed by Ostwald ripening and associated increase in crystallinity. Dark blue circles indicate amorphous porphyrin; light blue through red circles indicate the size of crystalline domains.
Range of vibrational line shape parameters of metal-carbonyl response within RuOEP nanocrystals as a function of crystallinity with the corresponding number of coupled molecules as derived from the vibrational exciton model
| 0% | — | — | 1,930 to 1,932 | 15 to 30 | — | — | 1 | 0 |
| 40 to 70% | 1,920 to 1,923 | 6 to 9 | 1,930 to 1,932 | 11 to 15 | 1,945 to 1,949 | 6 to 12 | 2 to 6 | 1 to 5 |
| >90% | 1,917 to 1,921 | 5 to 10 | — | — | 1,945 to 1,949 | 6 to 12 | ||
| 1,917 | — | 1,931 | — | 1,949 | — | 1.2 |
Spectroscopic parameters are in cm−1.
N is the number of molecules based on 1Deff model with inter molecular spacing of 1 nm.
Values , , and calculated for infinite chain with model parameters cm−1 (fixed).
Coupling parameters and predicted values of , , for different models of RuOEP
Superscripts are as follows: NN, model with nearest-neighbor interactions; tetragonal, based on structure by Miranda et al. (40); triclinic, based on structure by Salzmann et al. (42).