Literature DB >> 32169955

Use of health services by preschool-aged children who are developmentally vulnerable and socioeconomically disadvantaged: testing the inverse care law.

Sue Woolfenden1,2, Claire Galea3,4, Hannah Badland5, Hayley Smithers Sheedy3,4, Katrina Williams6, Anne M Kavanagh7, Dinah Reddihough8,9, Sharon Goldfeld10,11, Raghu Lingam2, Nadia Badawi3,4, Meredith O'Connor10.   

Abstract

AIM: The inverse care law suggests that those with the greatest need for services are least likely to receive them. Our aim of this study was to test the inverse care law in relation to the use of health services by children aged 4-5 years in Australia who were developmentally vulnerable and socioeconomically disadvantaged.
METHOD: Cross-sectional data were collected from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children birth cohort when the children were aged 4-5 years. Children were grouped according to the combination of developmental vulnerability (yes, no) and socioeconomic disadvantage (lower, higher), resulting in four groups (reference group: developmentally vulnerable and disadvantaged). Multivariate regression was used to examine the impact of the combination of developmental vulnerability and disadvantage on health service use, adjusting for other sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: 3967 (90%) of children had data on developmental vulnerability at 4-5 years. A third of children (32.6%) were classified as developmentally vulnerable, and 10%-25% of these children had used health services. Non-disadvantaged children who were developmentally vulnerable (middle need) had 1.4-2.0 times greater odds of using primary healthcare, specialist and hospital services; and non-disadvantaged children who were not developmentally vulnerable (lowest need) had 1.6-1.8 times greater odds of using primary healthcare services, compared with children who were developmentally vulnerable and disadvantaged (highest need).
CONCLUSION: We found some evidence of the inverse care law. Equity in service delivery remains a challenge that is critically important to tackle in ensuring a healthy start for children. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child health; disability; paediatric; social inequalities

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32169955     DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  2 in total

1.  Use of administrative record linkage to examine patterns of universal early childhood health and education service use from birth to Kindergarten (age four years) and developmental vulnerability in the Preparatory Year (age five years) in Tasmania, Australia.

Authors:  Catherine L Taylor; Daniel Christensen; Alison J Venn; David B Preen; Joel Stafford; Emily Hansen; Kim Jose; Stephen R Zubrick
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 2.  Delivering paediatric precision medicine: Genomic and environmental considerations along the causal pathway of childhood neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Sue Woolfenden; Michelle A Farrar; Valsamma Eapen; Anne Masi; Claire E Wakefield; Nadia Badawi; Iona Novak; Natasha Nassar; Raghu Lingam; Russell C Dale
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.864

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.