| Literature DB >> 32168777 |
Simranjeet Singh1, Vijay Kumar2, Sourav Singla1, Minaxi Sharma3, Dhananjaya P Singh4, Ram Prasad5, Vijay Kumar Thakur6, Joginder Singh1.
Abstract
Many bacteria have the potential to use specific pesticides as a source of carbon, phosphorous, nitrogen and sulphur. Acephate degradation by microbes is considered to be a safe and effective method. The overall aim of the present study was to identify acephate biodegrading microorganisms and to investigate the degradation rates of acephate under the stress of humic acid and most common metal ions Fe(III) and copper Cu(II). Pseudomonas azotoformanss strain ACP1, Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain ACP2, and Pseudomonas putida ACP3 were isolated from acephate contaminated soils. Acephate of concentration 100 ppm was incubated with separate strain inoculums and periodic samples were drawn for UV-visible, FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy) and MS (Mass Spectrometry) analysis. Methamidophos, S-methyl O-hydrogen phosphorothioamidate, phosphenothioic S-acid, and phosphenamide were the major metabolites formed during the degradation of acephate. The rate of degradation was applied using pseudo-first-order kinetics to calculate the half-life (t1/2) values, which were 14.33-16.72 d-1 (strain(s) + acephate), 18.81-21.50 d-1 (strain(s) + acephate + Cu(II)), 20.06 -23.15 d-1 (strain(s) + acephate + Fe(II)), and 15.05-17.70 d-1 (strains + acephate + HA). The biodegradation efficiency of the three bacterial strains can be ordered as P. aeruginosa > P. putida > P. azotoformans. The present study illustrated the decomposition mechanism of acephate under different conditions, and the same may be applied to the removal of other xenobiotic compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas; acephate; humic acid; metal stress; toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32168777 PMCID: PMC7175145 DOI: 10.3390/biom10030433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree of isolated Pseudomonas strains from Jalandhar, Punjab, showing relations of the strains ACP1, ACP2, and ACP3 with the closest relatives on the basis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis.
UV—visible study (at 600 nm) for cell growth (%) under the influence of acephate/humic acid/metal ions by three bacterial strains in M9 medium.
| Time Period (days) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Conditions | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 |
| Cell Growth (%) with | ||||
| Inoculum + acephate | 14 ± 0.85 a,b | 25 ± 2.44 a,b* | 42 ± 3.44 a,b* | 77 ± 4.55 a,b |
| Inoculum + acephate + Cu(II) | 10 ± 0.71 a,b* | 22 ± 1.05 a,b | 43 ± 3.21 a,b* | 67 ± 3.72 a,b* |
| Inoculum + acephate + Fe(III) | 10 ± 0.79 a*,b* | 26 ± 2.85 a,b* | 39 ± 2.97 a*,b | 66 ± 3.44 a,b* |
| Inoculum + acephate + HA | 8 ± 0.57 a*,b | 28 ± 2.45 a*,b | 47 ± 3.01 a,b | 74 ± 4.22 a,b |
| Cell Growth (%) with | ||||
| Inoculum + acephate | 11 ± 0.65 a,b* | 27 ± 1.58 a,b* | 54 ± 2.95 a,b | 74 ± 4.55 a,b |
| Inoculum + acephate + Cu(II) | 9 ± 0.25 a*,b | 24 ± 1.58 a,b* | 39 ± 2.33 a,b | 64 ± 3.09 a*,b |
| Inoculum + acephate + Fe(III) | 7 ± 0.38 a,b | 25 ± 1.11 a,b* | 33 ± 2.08 a,b | 60 ± 4.27 a*,b |
| Inoculum + acephate + HA | 11 ± 0.61 a,b* | 26 ± 1.44 a,b* | 44 ± 2.81 a,b | 71 ± 4.92 a,b |
| Cell Growth (%) with | ||||
| Inoculum + acephate | 12 ± 0.66 a,b | 22 ± 1.25 a,b* | 41 ± 2.58 a,b | 69 ± 4.11 a,b* |
| Inoculum + acephate + Cu(II) | 9 ± 0.40 a*,b | 18 ± 1.03 a,b | 37 ± 2.08 a,b | 64 ± 3.55 a*,b |
| Inoculum + acephate + Fe(III) | 10 ± 0.53 a*,b | 23 ± 1.44 a,b* | 39 ± 2.35 a*,b | 61 ± 3.77 a*,b |
| Inoculum + acephate + HA | 8 ± 0.33 a*,b | 28 ± 1.42 a*,b | 45 ± 2.48 a,b | 69 ± 4.02 a,b* |
a = results significantly differed (at p < 0.05) for three strains in the same experimental conditions. a* = results did not differ significantly (at p < 0.05) for two or more than two strains in the same experimental conditions. b = results significantly differed (at p < 0.05) for each strain in four different experimental conditions. b* = results did not differ significantly (at p < 0.05) for each strain in different four experimental conditions.
Kinetics of biodegradation of acephate by three bacterial strains in M9 medium.
| Experimental Conditions | K | t1/2 (days) | Equation of line | r2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Inoculum + acephate | 0.021 | 14.33 a,b | y = −0.021x + 2.024 | 0.98 |
| Inoculum + acephate + Cu(II) | 0.016 | 18.81 a,b | y = −0.016x + 2.002 | 0.94 |
| Inoculum + acephate + Fe(III) | 0.015 | 20.06 a,b | y = −0.015x + 1.991 | 0.96 |
| Inoculum + acephate + HA | 0.020 | 15.05 a,b | y = −0.02x + 2.009 | 0.97 |
|
| ||||
| Inoculum + acephate | 0.019 | 15.84 a,b | y = −0.019x + 2.009 | 0.97 |
| Inoculum + acephate + Cu(II) | 0.014 | 21.50 a,b | y = −0.014x + 1.993 | 0.98 |
| Inoculum + acephate + Fe(III) | 0.013 | 23.15 a*,b | y = −0.013x + 1.992 | 0.96 |
| Inoculum + acephate + HA | 0.017 | 17.70 a*,b | y = −0.017x + 1.999 | 0.95 |
|
| ||||
| Inoculum + acephate | 0.018 | 16.72 a,b | y = −0.018x + 2.012 | 0.97 |
| Inoculum + acephate + Cu(II) | 0.015 | 20.06 a,b | y = −0.015x + 2.011 | 0.98 |
| Inoculum + acephate + Fe(III) | 0.013 | 23.15 a*,b | y = −0.013x + 1.983 | 0.96 |
| Inoculum + acephate + HA | 0.017 | 17.70 a*,b | y = −0.017x + 1.992 | 0.97 |
a = results significantly differed (at p < 0.05) for three strains in the same experimental conditions. a* = results did not differ significantly (at p < 0.05) for two or more than two strains in the same experimental conditions. b = results significantly differed (at p < 0.05) for each strain in four different experimental conditions.
Figure 2Removal (%) of acephate after incubation with three strains in M9 medium under different conditions.
Figure 3FTIR analysis of acephate (a), and its metabolites after 30th day (b, c & d). Here a, b, and c represent the FTIR spectrum of metabolites with respect to P. aeruginosa, P. putida, and P. azotoformans strains.
Figure 4LC-MS(Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry) chromatogram (after 30th day) of (1) acephate + strain, (2) acephate + strain + Cu(II), (3) acephate + strain + Fe(III), and (4) acephate + strain + humic acid (here strain is P. aeruginosa).
Figure 5Most probable mechanistic pathway of decomposition of acephate in M9 medium.