Literature DB >> 32168351

The global seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in women who had spontaneous abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tooran Nayeri1,2,3, Shahabeddin Sarvi1,2, Mahmood Moosazadeh4, Afsaneh Amouei1,2, Zahra Hosseininejad1,2,3, Ahmad Daryani1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is an intracellular pathogen that can lead to abortion in pregnant women infected with this parasite. Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate the global seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had spontaneous abortion based on the results of published articles and evaluate the relationship between seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and abortion via a systematical review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: Different databases were searched in order to gain access to all studies on the seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii antibodies in women who had spontaneous abortion and association between seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and abortion published up to April 25th, 2019. Odds ratio (OR) and the pooled rate seroprevalence of T. gondii with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effects model.
RESULTS: In total, 8 cross-sectional studies conducted on 1275 women who had abortion in present pregnancy, 40 cross-sectional studies performed on 9122 women who had a history of abortion, and 60 articles (involving 35 cross-sectional studies including 4436 women who had spontaneous abortion as case and 10398 as control and 25 case-control studies entailing 4656 cases and 3178 controls) were included for the final analyses. The random-effects estimates of the prevalence of anti-T. gondii IgG antibody in women who had abortion in present pregnancy and women who had a history of abortion were 33% (95% CI: 17%-49%) and 43% (95% CI: 27%-60%), respectively. In addition, the pooled OR for anti-T. gondii IgG antibody in cross-sectional and case-control studies among women who had spontaneous abortion were 1.65 (95% CI: 1.31-2.09) and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.56-3.28), respectively. Also, statistical analysis showed that the pooled OR of the risk of anti-T. gondii IgM antibody 1.39 (95% CI: 0.61-3.15) in cross-sectional and 4.33 (95% CI: 2.42-7.76) in case-control studies.
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the current study, T. gondii infection could be considered a potential risk factor for abortion. It is recommended to carry out further and more comprehensive investigations to determine the effect of T. gondii infection on abortion to prevent and control toxoplasmosis among pregnant women around the world.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32168351      PMCID: PMC7069604          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


Introduction

Toxoplasmosis is a serious endemic disease caused by an intracellular parasite called Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii). According to the seroepidemiological studies, this parasite infects about 15–85% of the total population of the world [1-3]. The only known definitive hosts for T. gondii are members of family Felidae, including domestic and wild cats. On the other hand, various warm-blooded mammals, including humans and rodents can be the intermediate host of this parasite [4]. Human infections are acquired through several major ways: 1) consumption of undercooked meat especially pork and mutton and unpasteurized milk from infected animals, 2) direct or indirect contact with oocysts from the environment, 3) vertical transmission during pregnancy, 4) blood transfusions, and 5) organ transplants [5-8]. T. gondii infection is generally asymptomatic in immunologically healthy adults. However, it can cause a variety of life-threatening clinical complications in immunocompromised patients [9]. This parasite is of utmost importance during pregnancy since it can cross the placental barrier to infect embryonic tissues [10, 11]. If this infection occurs during the first and second trimester of pregnancy, it may manifest in severe symptoms, such as low birth weight, hydrocephaly, intracranial calcifications, and retinochoroiditis that are recognizable at birth [12]. On the other hand, infections in the third trimester of pregnancy do generally not show symptoms at birth; however, they may develop intracranial calcifications, hearing impairment, visual disorders, and developmental delay later in life [13]. The global annual incidence rate of congenital toxoplasmosis (CT) is estimated to be 190,100 cases with an approximate incidence rate of 1.5 cases per 1000 live births [14]. Effective factor in transplacental transmission and severity of CT depends on the time of maternal infection [15]. There are two types of miscarriage: sporadic and recurrent [16]. Spontaneous pregnancy loss is a clinical problem of pregnancy occurring in 15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies [17]. The diagnosis of CT for the prevention of abortion is based on laboratory techniques, monitoring the immune response, direct detection of the parasite by animal or tissue inoculation, and molecular techniques [18]. Some of the risk factors of abortion cited in different studies include ethnicity, stress, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory or some antidepressant drugs, smoking, use of cocaine, caffeine and alcohol abuse, and obesity [19-29]. Specifically, 15% of early abortions and 66% of late abortions are attributed to infections [30, 31]. T. gondii, Toxocara cati, Toxocara canis, Plasmodium falciparum, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Brucella species, Klebsiella pneumonia, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella—Zoster Virus, human immunodeficiency virus, and human papillomavirus are the most common causes of intrauterine infections [32, 33]. Congenital infections, such as CT, are the main causes of miscarriage [33]. Habitual abortion or recurrent miscarriage is the three consecutive pregnancy loss prior to 20 weeks from the last menstrual period [17]. The common causes of habitual abortion include untreated hypothyroidism [34], parental chromosomal abnormalities [35], certain uterine anatomic abnormalities [36], uncontrolled diabetes mellitus [37], immunologic abnormalities [38], infections [39], and environmental factors [40]. The prevalence of T. gondii infection in pregnant women varies significantly across different continents and countries around the world. Seroprevalence of T. gondii is reported to be high in Europe, up to 54% in Southern European countries, whereas this value was found to be within 18.5%-92.5% in sub-Saharan Africa [41, 42]. Given the important role of T. gondii infection in abortion and indefinite rate of T. gondii-associated abortion around the world, the present study aimed to determine the rate of seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies among women who had abortion or a history of abortion, and evaluate the relationship between seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and abortion in women.

Methods

Design and protocol registration

A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42019124531) and published and the methods are briefly reported here [43]. We used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines for the performance of this study (S1 Table) [44].

Search strategy

A literature search was performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar search engine from inception until 25th of April 2019. Search terms are applied alone or in combination as follows: (Toxoplasma gondii OR T. gondii OR toxoplasmosis) AND (abortion OR miscarriage OR fetal loss) AND pregnant women. In addition, the search was restricted to English language articles; therefore, published articles in non-English languages and unpublished studies were not investigated. Moreover, citation lists of relevant papers were checked.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria entailed English language articles evaluating the effects of T. gondii on abortion only among human subjects in cross-sectional and case-control studies. On the other hand, we excluded non-original papers (reviews, systematic reviews, editorials or letters), and conference papers. Also, the studies that T. gondii infection was diagnosed by molecular methods in women who had spontaneous abortion, paraffin-embedded blocks and placenta tissues were excluded from our study.

Study selection and data extraction

All retrieved articles were stored in EndNote X9 to organize the summaries. Search results were merged, duplicates were removed automatically and all the titles and abstracts and identified relevant articles were independently scanned by two team members (Fig 1). Two reviewers independently extracted the data using a standardized form. The extracted variables included the name of the first author, year of publication, location of the study, diagnostic method, serological results, number of seropositive cases, as well as the age of the participants.
Fig 1

Flow diagram of the study design process.

Quality assessment

The quality of the articles was assessed independently in terms of selection, comparability, and exposure. Quality was scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scales (NOS) [45]. The quality scale was within the range of 0–9 points with a score of ≤ 3 representing a low-quality study. On the other hand, studies with a NOS score > 6 in case-control and > 5 in cross-sectional studies are considered high quality.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed in Stata software (version 14; Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). The odds ratio (ORs) was used for this meta-analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the relationship between seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and abortion in women who had spontaneous abortion. Moreover, the pooled seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies was calculated in women with either a recent abortion or a history of abortion. In the forest plots, OR > 1 denotes the positive effect of T. gondii on abortion, whereas an OR < 1 is indicative of the protective effect of T. gondii on abortion. In addition, I2 statistics were applied to represent the heterogeneity index [46]. Only when I2 > 50%, the heterogeneity was considered significant. Publication bias was evaluated through Egger’s test and it was considered significant when P-value was less than 0.05 [47]. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis test was performed by removing the effect of each study on the overall results. In addition, the method of “trim and fill” has been used for a comprehensive evaluation of the possible effects of publication bias. The subgroup analysis and meta-regression test were conducted according to the diagnostic methods and type of study.

Results

Study identification and selection

A total of 35105 publications were identified and archived in EndNote (version X9) to organize the resources used in the research process. Duplicates were removed by automation followed by a manual duplicate search. The duplication search included a comparison of the authors’ name, journals name, year of publication, volume number, issue number, page number, and the titles. In the next step, the titles and abstracts of full texts were independently reviewed by two researchers (TN and ZH). Finally, 244 papers were selected for the accurate evaluation of full texts out of which 72 papers were included in the systematic review. One study was not analyzed because it did not accurately quantify the number of IgM and IgG positive cases separately [48], and its data were only systematically presented; therefore, 71 papers were included in the meta-analysis. Eight articles were related to the seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had spontaneous abortion in present pregnancy [49-56]. Moreover, serologic methods were used in six of these studies [49–52, 55, 56]. Two out of 8 articles used both serological and molecular methods in the diagnosis of T. gondii [53, 54]. The seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had a history of abortion (one or more times) was investigated in 40 articles. In addition, 60 articles were reviewed to estimate the relationship between seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and abortion, out of which 35 articles were cross-sectional studies that examined the seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had a history of abortion; however, it was possible to calculate the ORs for them due to the nature of the studies. Therefore, they were also used to evaluate the relationship between seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and abortion. Fig 1 demonstrates the process of articles screening and selection.

General characteristics of included studies

General characteristics of included studies are depicted in Tables 1–3. These studies which were published between 1971 and 2019 included 25 case-control and 47 cross-sectional studies. As shown in the Tables 1–3, various studies have used the different diagnostic methods, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), direct agglutination test (DAT), complement fixation test (CFT), latex agglutination test (LAT), indirect haemagglutination (IHA), haemagglutination (HA), indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), avidity test, Remington test, mini VIDAS technique, and one step advanced quality. Participants in the majority of articles were ascertained by ELISA (50 studies). Some studies used two or more diagnostic methods for T. gondii infection. It is noted that most researchers performed the tests using commercial kits and some of them used in house tests.
Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies for seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had a history of abortion.

First authorPublication yearPlace of studyType of studyMethod (s)TestSample size (n)IgG+ n (%)IgM+ n (%)Age (years)
Kimball, 1971 [55]1971USACsDATCFTIgGIgM941355 (37.72)----
Stray-Pedersen, 1979 [57]1979NorwayCsDATIFAIgG2048279 (13.62)--≥ 35
Decavalas, 1990 [58]1990GreeceCsIFA for IgGRemington for IgMIgGIgM12666 (52.38)0 (0)--
Singh, 1998 [59]1998United Arab EmiratesCsIFAIgGIgM1823547 (30)3 (0.16)--
Qublan, 2002 [60]2002AmmanCsIFAIgGIgM10464 (61.53)--15–46
Elnahas, 2003 [5]2003SudanCsELISAIgGIgM12946 (35.65)----
Nissapatorn, 2003 [61]2003MalaysiaCsELISAIgGIgM1410 (71.42)--15–44
Chopra, 2004 [62]2004IndiaCsELISAIgM11861 (51.69)15–45
Ertug, 2005 [63]2005TurkeyCsELISAIFADATAvidity testIgG9033 (36.7)--15–40
Barbosa, 2009 [64]2009BrazilCsEIAIgGIgM7146 (64.78)--13–40
Nijem, 2009 [65]2009PalestineCsELISAIgGIgM7625 (32.89)14 (18.42)16–43
Mousa, 2011 [66]2011LibyaCsELISAIgGIgM11755 (47.1)--18–44
Drueish, 2011 [67]2011IraqCsELISAIgGIgM12225 (20.49)17 (13.93)15–45
Pavlinová, 2011 [32]2011Slovak RepublicCsEIAIgGIgM22193 (42.1)4 (1.8)31.3 ± 5.6
Jasim, 2011 [68]2011IraqCsELISAIgGIgM162144 (88.88)148 (91.35)15–65
Nissapatorn, 2011 [69]2011ThailandCsELISAIgGIgM14743 (29.25)--15–45
Hajsoleimani, 2012 [6]2012IranCsELISAIgGIgM423159 (37.6)--> 30
Malarvizhi, 2012 [70]2012IndiaCsELISAIgGIgM6712 (17.91)(11.94)> 40
Padmavathy, 2013 [71]2013IndiaCsELISAIgGIgM4727 (57.44)4 (8.51)19.36
Ebrahimzadeh, 2013 [72]2013IranCsELISAIgGIgM7117 (23.94)--14–44
Moura, 2013 [73]2013BrasilCsIFAELISAIgGIgM9259 (64.13)--14–45
Babaie, 2013 [74]2013IranCsELISAIgGIgM8231 (37.80)--16–47
Chintapalli, 2013 [75]2013IndiaCsELISAIgGIgM2015 (75)5 (25)15–34
Alvarado-Esquivel, 2014 [76]2014MexicoCsEIAIgGIgM32622 (6.7)2 (0.6)35.57 ± 12.43
Almushait, 2014 [77]2014Saudi ArabiaCsELISAIgGIgM16271 (43.82)12 (7.40)16–41
Abedi, 2015 [78]2015IranCsELISAIgG300111 (37)--16–39
Awoke, 2015 [42]2015EthiopiaCsLATIgGIgM9529 (30.5)--15–44
Gelaye, 2015 [79]2015EthiopiaCsLATIgGIgM7162 (87.3)--15–35
Alvarado-Esquivel, 2015 [80]2015MexicoCsEIAIgGIgM432 (4.7)--16–50
Anubhuti, 2015 [81]2015IndiaCsLFIAIgGIgM6012 (20)0 (0)21–35
Mohamed, 2016 [82]2016Saudi ArabiaCsEIAIgGIgM12623 (18.25)0 (0)16–40
Mohaghegh, 2016 [83]2016IranCsELISAIgGIgM3535 (100)--18–45
Imam, 2016 [84]2016EgyptCsELISAIgGIgM11222 (19.6)--15–49
Nazir, 2017 [85]2017PakistanCsELISAIgG9331 (33.33)--≥ 36
Yasmeen, 2017 [86]2017IndiaCsELISAIgGIgM3910 (25.6)--18–35
Negero, 2017 [41]2017EthiopiaCsLATIgGIgM207176 (83.8)--15–34
Matin, 2017 [87]2017IranCsELISANested-PCRIgGIgM20086 (43)8 (4)16–41
Costa, 2018 [88]2018BrazilCsELISAIgGIgM8964 (71.9)--> 19
Hafez Hassanain [89]2018EgyptCsELISAIgGIgMIgG avidity4720 (42.5)--15–44
Rashno, 2019 [90]2019IranCsELISAPCRIgGIgM63 (50)0 (0)--

Cs: cross-sectional, DAT: direct agglutination test, CFT: complement fixation test, LAT: latex agglutination test, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, IFA: indirect immunofluorescence assay, EIA: enzyme immunoassay, LFIA: lateral flow immunoassay, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M

Table 3

Description of the studies included looking for an association between seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and abortion.

First authorPublication yearPlace of studyType of studyMethod (s)TestNCase (n)Case & IgG+ (n, %)Case & IgM+ (n, %)Control (n)Control & IgG+ (n, %)Control & IgM+ (n, %)Age (years)
Kimball, 1971 [55]1971USACsDATCFTIgGIgM4832941355 (37.72)--38911206 (31)--P: --C: 25
Stray-Pedersen, 1977 [91]1977NorwayCcDATIFACFTIgG21615739 (25)--5911 (19)--P: 29.4C: 29.4
Lolis, 1978 [92]1978GreeceCcHAIFAIgGIgM IgA23215262 (40.8)--8010 (12.5)----
Decavalas, 1990 [58]1990GreeceCsIFA for IgGRemington for IgMIgG IgM30312666 (52.38)0 (0)17788 (49.71)0 (0)P: 27.8C: 25.9
Galvan Ramirez, 1995 [93]1995MexicoCcELISAIgG IgM15510548 (44.9)35 (33.3)5013(26.01)1 (1.9)P: 32.3 ± 7C: 31.7 ± 7.1
Sahwi, 1995 [94]1995EgyptCcIHAIgG IgM14010037 (37)19 (19)404 (10)3 (7.5)P: 30 ± 5.975C: 28 ± 5.236
Djurkovic-Djakovic, 1995 [95]1995YogoslaviCcDATIgG IgM23151747570 (32.62)94 (5.38)568193 (33.97)27 (4.75)14–45
Al Hamdani, 1997 [96]1997IraqCcIHAIFAIgG IgM2008115 (18.5)--1197 (5.9)--P: 29 ± 7.9C: 27 ±6.93
Zargar, 1998 [97]1998IndiaCcELISAIgM454285--141 (49.47)169--15 (8.87)P: 27.73 ± 4.57C: 28.59 ±5.13
Qublan, 2002 [60]2002AmmanCsIFAIgG IgM28010464 (61.53)--17668 (38.63)--15–46
Elnahas, 2003 [5]2003SudanCsELISAIgG IgM48712946 (35.65)--358120 (33.51)----
Nissapatorn, 2003 [61]2003MalaysiaCsELISAIgG IgM2001410 (71.42)18688 (47.3)15–44
Chopra, 2004 [62]2004IndiaCsELISAIgM21811861 (51.69)1000 (0)15–45
Nimri, 2004 [98]2004FranceCcELISANested PCRIgG IgM24814880 (54.0)4 (2.7)10012 (12.0)0 (0)P: 28C: 28
Ertug, 2005 [63]2005TurkeyCsELISAIFADATAvidity TestIgG3579033 (36.7)--26778 (29.2)--15–40
Surpam, 2006 [99]2006IndiaCcELISAIgM11944--12 (27.27)75--1 (1.33)20–38
Sebastian, 2008 [100]2008IndiaCcELISAIgG IgM1017136 (50.7)30--6 (20)15–34
Al-Saeed, 2008 [101]2008IraqCcLATIgG IgM14012050 (41.7)--200 (0)----
Barbosa, 2009 [64]2009BrazilCsEIAIgG IgM1907146 (64.78)--11981 (68.06)--13–40
Nijem, 2009 [65]2009PalestineCsELISAIgG IgM2047625 (32.89)14 (18.42)12832 (25)22 (17.18)16–43
AL–Taie, 2010 [102]2009IraqCcELISAIgM8838--15 (39.4)50--6 (12)> 41
Hassan, 2009 [103]2009IraqCcELISAIgG IgM119967 (7.29)20 (20.83)232 (8.7)0 (0)23.9–28.5
Drueish, 2011 [67]2011IraqCsELISAIgG IgM17712225 (20.49)17 (13.93)5012(24)0 (0)15–45
Pavlinová, 2011 [32]2011Slovak RepublicCsEIAIgG IgM53722193 (42.1)4 (1.8)17945 (25.1)5 (2.8)P: 31.3 ± 5.6C: 29.4 ± 5.6
Jasim, 2011 [68]2011IraqCsELISAIgG IgM300162144 (88.88)148 (91.35)138123 (89.13)122 (88.40)15–65
Mousa, 2011 [66]2011LibyaCsELISAIgG IgM14311755 (47.1)--269 (34.6)--18–44
Nissapatorn, 2011 [69]2011ThailandCsELISAIgG IgM64014743 (29.25)--493138 (28)--15–45
Hajsoleimani, 2012 [6]2012IranCsELISAIgG IgM500423159 (37.6)--7730 (39)--> 30
Malarvizhi, 2012 [70]2012IndiaCsELISAIgG IgM2326712 (17.91)8 (11.94)16511 (4.74)1 (0.43)> 40
Elamin, 2012 [104]2012Saudi ArabiaCcELISAPCRIgG IgM1889433 (35.1)5 (15.2)9437 (39.4)6 (16.2)--
Ebrahimzadeh, 2013 [72]2013IranCsELISAIgG IgM2217117 (23.94)--15051 (34)--14–44
Babaie, 2013 [74]2013IranCsELISAIgG IgM4198231 (37.80)--337113 (33.5)--16–47
Moura, 2013 [73]2013BrazilCsIFAELISAIgG IgM4009259 (64.13)--308175 (56.81)--14–45
Chintapalli, 2013 [75]2013IndiaCsELISAIgG IgM322015 (75)5 (25)121 (8.33)1 (8.33)15–34
Hussan, 2013 [105]2013IraqCcELISAIgG IgM25521046 (22)32 (15.23)453 (6.66)0 (0)--
Abou-Gabal, 2013 [48]2013EgyptCcOne step advanced qualityIgG IgM8040----40----P: 33.13 ± 10.341C: 33.05 ± 8.941
Siddiqui, 2014 [106]2014IndiaCcELISAIgG IgM6348--17 (35.4)15--0 (0)> 30
Almushait, 2014 [77]2014Saudi ArabiaCsELISAIgG IgM48716271 (43.82)12 (7.40)325118 (36.3)18 (5.5)16–41
Sultana, 2014 [107]2014BangladeshCcELISAIgG IgM91468 (17.4)7 (15.2)454 (8.9)0 (0)P: 24.43 ± 4.17C: 24.56 ±4.36
Abbas, 2014 [108]2014IraqCcELISAIgG IgM13010042 (42)12 (12)300 (0)0 (0)--
Awoke, 2015 [42]2015EthiopiaCsLATIgG IgM3849529 (30.5)--28942 (14.5)--15–44
Gelaye, 2015 [79]2015EthiopiaCsLATIgG IgM2887162 (87.3)--217184 (84.8)--15–35
Saki, 2015 [109]2015IranCcELISAIgG IgM26013032 (24.6)1 (0.76)13028 (21.5)0 (0)--
Kamal, 2015 [110]2015EgyptCcELISAIgG IgM1492918 (62.0)--1208 (6.66)--18–40
Anubhuti, 2015 [81]2015IndiaCsLFIAIgG IgM1206012 (20)0 (0)603 (5)0 (0)21–35
Alvarado-Esquivel, 2015 [80]2015MexicoCsEIAIgG IgM150432 (4.7)--10712 (11.2)--16–50
Ghasemi, 2016 [111]2016IranCcELISAPCRIgG IgM1928222 (26.8)3 (3.6)11029 (26.4)1 (0.9)P: 28.29C: 28.58
Mohaghegh, 2016 [83]2016IranCsELISAIgG IgM3503535 (100)--31575 (23.8)--18–45
Mohamed, 2016 [82]2016Saudi ArabiaCsELISAIgG IgM32612623 (18.25)0 (0)20046 (23)4 (2)16–40
Nazir, 2017 [85]2016PakistanCsELISAIgG4039331 (33.33)--31040 (12.90)--≥ 36
Imam, 2016 [84]2016EgyptCsELISAIgG IgM13811222 (19.6)--264 (15.4)--15–49
Rasti, 2016 [112]2016IranCcELISAIgG IgM1798122 (27.2)1 (1.2)9828 (28.6)2 (2)P: 28.2C: 28.6
Yasmeen, 2017 [86]2017IndiaCsELISAIgG IgM2513910 (25.6)--21243 (20.3)--18–35
Negero, 2017 [41]2017EthiopiaCsLATIgG IgM369207176 (83.8)--16234 (16.2)--15–34
Matin, 2017 [87]2017IranCsELISA Nested-PCRIgG IgM2005831 (53.44)0 (0)14255 (38.73)8 (5.63)16–41
Costa, 2018 [88]2018BrazilCsELISAIgG IgM3528964 (71.9)--263189 (71.8)--> 19
Çakmak, 2018 [113]2018TurkeyCcELISAIgG IgM1240412125 (30.6)27 (6.6)828157 (19.2)35 (4.2)P: 27.6 ± 11.4C: 29.1 ± 9.87
Hafez Hassanain, 2018 [89]2018EgyptCsELISAIgGIgM IgG avidity3884720 (42.5)--34159 (17.3)--15–44
Rashno, 2019 [90]2019IranCsELISAPCRIgG IgM9863 (50)0 (0)9231 (33.69)0 (0)--
Kheirandish, 2019 [114]2019IranCcELISAIgG IgM480240114 (47.5)8 (3.3)240111 (46.3)1 (0.4)P: 27 ± 6.499C: 27.01 ± 6.459

Cs: cross-sectional, CC: case-control, DAT: direct agglutination test, CFT: complement fixation test, LAT: latex agglutination test, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, IHA: indirect haemagglutination, HA: haemagglutination, IFA: indirect immunofluorescence assay, EIA: enzyme immunoassay, LFIA: lateral flow immunoassay, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M, Case: women who had abortion, Control: women who had not abortion

Cs: cross-sectional, DAT: direct agglutination test, CFT: complement fixation test, LAT: latex agglutination test, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, IFA: indirect immunofluorescence assay, EIA: enzyme immunoassay, LFIA: lateral flow immunoassay, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M Cs: cross-sectional, DAT: direct agglutination test, CFT: complement fixation test, LAT: latex agglutination test, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, Q-PCR: quantitative PCR, LAMP: loop-mediated isothermal amplification, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M Cs: cross-sectional, CC: case-control, DAT: direct agglutination test, CFT: complement fixation test, LAT: latex agglutination test, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, IHA: indirect haemagglutination, HA: haemagglutination, IFA: indirect immunofluorescence assay, EIA: enzyme immunoassay, LFIA: lateral flow immunoassay, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M, Case: women who had abortion, Control: women who had not abortion In addition, the included articles in the present meta-analysis showed an acceptable quality (i.e., ≥ 3 for cross-sectional studies and ≥ 4 for case-control studies). S2 Table represents the quality score of different eligible studies.

Seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had a history of abortion

A total of 9004 women who had a history of abortion were investigated for the seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii IgG antibody in 39 articles, out of which 2930 were positive using several serological methods. In addition, 16 studies entailing 3662 women who had spontaneous abortion were reviewed for the seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii IgM antibody out of which 286 women were seropositive. According to forest plot diagram in Fig 2 and S1 Fig, the pooled seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies in women who had a history of abortion based on a random effects model was estimated at 43% (95% CI: 27%-60%) and 3% (95% CI: 3%-4%), respectively. Furthermore, I2 statistic revealed a significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 99.87%, P = 0.00). Moreover, subgroup analysis results based on diagnostic methods showed that heterogeneity for ELISA and other methods (DAT, CFT, LAT, IFA, EIA, LFIA, and Remington test) were I2 = 99.53%, P = 0.00 and I2 = 99.22%, P = 0.00, respectively. In addition, heterogeneity between groups was P = 0.744 (Fig 2).
Fig 2

The reported seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii IgG antibody in women who had a history of abortion.

The horizontal lines define the reported 95% confidence interval for the seroprevalence in each study, and the diamond below the graph shows the pooled seroprevalence.

The reported seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii IgG antibody in women who had a history of abortion.

The horizontal lines define the reported 95% confidence interval for the seroprevalence in each study, and the diamond below the graph shows the pooled seroprevalence.

Seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had abortion in present pregnancy

A total number of 1275 women who had spontaneous abortion in present pregnancy were examined for the seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii antibodies using different serologic tests. 1275 serum samples in eight studies and 1136 serum samples of women who had abortion in present pregnancy in seven studies were evaluated for anti- T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies using serologic tests out of which 443 and 67 cases were positive for anti- T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies, respectively. The pooled seroprevalence rates of anti- T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies in women who had abortion in present pregnancy using a random-effects model were determined to be 33% (95% CI: 17%-49%) and 1% (95% CI: 1%-2%), respectively (Fig 3 and S2 Fig). The results of heterogeneity test in different studies for IgG and IgM antibodies were I2 = 99.14%, P = 0.00; I2 = 92.06%, P = 0.00, respectively.
Fig 3

The reported seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii IgG antibody in women who had abortion in present pregnancy.

Relationship between anti-T. gondii IgG antibody and abortion

A total of 53 studies entailing 8448 women who had spontaneous abortion and 13097 control individuals were evaluated in the current study. This meta-analysis included 34 cross-sectional studies evaluating anti-T. gondii IgG antibody and abortion with 4318 women who had spontaneous abortion (1889 positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies) and 10298 women as the control group (3404 positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies). Moreover, 19 case-control articles evaluating anti-T. gondii IgG antibody and abortion were entered into the meta-analysis including 4130 women who had spontaneous abortion (1370 positive for anti- T. gondii antibodies) and 2799 controls (657 positive for anti- T. gondii antibodies). As depicted in the forest plot diagram, the pooled ORs of the risk of anti-T. gondii IgG antibody investigated in women who had spontaneous abortion in cross-sectional and case-control studies were 1.65 (95% CI: 1.31–2.09) and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.56–3.28), respectively (Figs 4 and 5). Additionally, the test of heterogeneity revealed significant heterogeneity among cross-sectional and case-control studies as I2 = 82.2%, P = 0.00 and I2 = 84.8%, P = 0.00, respectively. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test in cross-sectional studies (P = 0.194) and no publication bias was observed (S3 Fig). On the other hand, the results of Eggert’s test were statistically significant in case-control studies (P = 0.007) (S4 Fig). In addition, there was no change in the results of pooled random-effects analysis corrected by using “trim and fill” method (S5 Fig). The robustness and reliability of the results of this meta-analysis were indicated by sensitivity analysis (S6 and S7 Figs). In order to improve the interpretation of the meta-analysis results, a meta-regression test was performed based on the type of study revealing the significant effect of type of study on the heterogeneity of the studies (P = 0.032).
Fig 4

Forest plot diagram of cross-sectional studies showing IgG seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

Fig 5

Forest plot diagram of case-control studies showing IgG seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

Relationship between anti-T. gondii IgM antibody and abortion

A total of 29 papers were entered into the meta-analysis including 1132 women who had spontaneous abortion (269 positive for anti- T. gondii antibodies) and 1439 controls (198 positive for anti- T. gondii antibodies) in 10 cross-sectional studies, as well as 4077 women who had spontaneous abortion (489 positive for anti- T. gondii antibodies) and 2740 controls (104 positive for anti- T. gondii antibodies) in 19 case-control studies evaluating anti-T. gondii IgM antibody. The results of the meta-analysis indicated a common OR of the risk of anti-T. gondii IgM antibody 1.39 (95% CI: 0.61-3.15) in cross-sectional studies (Fig 6) and 4.33 (95% CI: 2.42–7.76) in case-control ones (Fig 7). Moreover, the results illustrated a significant heterogeneity in cross-sectional and case-control studies (I2 = 75.9%, P = 0.00 and I2 = 71.5%, P = 0.00), respectively.
Fig 6

Forest plot diagram of cross-sectional studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

Fig 7

Forest plot diagram of case-control studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

The results of Egger’s test were not statistically significant in cross-sectional studies (P = 0.36), which indicates no publication bias. However, the funnel plot shows asymmetric pattern (S8 Fig). Based on the results of “trim and fill” method, publication bias does not appear to have a significant impact on the results (S9 Fig). On the other hand, the results of Egger’s test were statistically significant in case-control studies (P = 0.02) (S10 Fig). According to the results of “trim and fill” method, publication bias does not have a significant effect on the results of the pooled random-effects analysis (S11 Fig). The results confirmed the reliability and stability of the present meta-analysis after the performance of sensitivity analyses (S12 and S13 Figs). In addition, we performed the meta-regression analysis based on the type of study suggesting type of study had no significant effect on the heterogeneity among the studies included in the present meta-analysis (P = 0.77).

Discussion

Fetuses are at high risk of this parasite during acute infection due to Toxoplasma's ability to cross the placental barrier and infect the fetus before it can acquire immunity [115]. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii antibodies in women who had abortion in present pregnancy or a history of abortion and the relationship between the seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii antibodies and abortion. The obtained results indicated that the overall estimation for the prevalence of anti- T. gondii IgG antibodies in women who had a history of abortion (43%; 95% CI: 27%-60%) was higher than those with present abortion (33%; 95% CI: 17%-49%). According to Figs 2 and 3, the highest and lowest seroprevalence rates of anti- T. gondii antibodies in women who had a history of abortion were related to the studies performed by Mohaghegh et al. as 100% (95% CI: 0–100%) [83] and Alvarado-Esquivel et al. as 5% (95% CI: 1–15%) [80]. Additionally, the highest and lowest seroprevalence rates of anti- T. gondii antibodies in women who had abortion in present pregnancy were observed in studies conducted by Hernández-Cortazar et al. as 59% (95% CI: 51–66%) [54] and Sanghi et al. as 0% (95% CI: 0–4%) [52]. IgG seropevalence is dependent on age and the risk of fetal loss increases after the age of 35 years. The risk of fetal loss is 9% in women aged 20–24 years and increases to 75% among women aged 45 and over. Because in the included articles the relationship of age and the seropositivity of T.gondii antibodies was not evaluated, we avoided the analysis of this main risk factor and this can be considered as a basic gap. The prevalence of this infection varies according to geographical area and differences in climate, dietary habits, hygiene, and susceptibility of the host [116]. The global prevalence of T. gondii infection in pregnant women is within the range of 7%-51.3% and seroprevalence in women with abnormal pregnancies is within the range of 17.5–52.3% [93, 97]. The overall prevalence of T. gondii varies from country to country. Moreover, in some countries it has declined dramatically over the years. For example, in France, the prevalence of T. gondii infection in pregnant women in the 1960s was 84%, in 1995, it was 54% and in 2003, it was 44%. Since France operates a congenital toxoplasmosis surveillance system; so, this system appears to be an essential tool for evaluating the efficacy of new screening strategies [117]. Moreover, this study assessed the relationship between seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii antibodies and abortion. The results revealed that the ORs of prevalence of anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies in women who had spontaneous abortion were 1.65 (95% CI: 1.31–2.09) in cross-sectional and 2.26 (95% CI: 1.56–3.28) in case-control studies, compared to control group. In all of these analyses, heterogeneity was significant (I2 > 50%). Variation in these studies in terms of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the diverse populations, the difference in the methods of selection of the target populations, the age of the participants in the studies, the type of study (cross-sectional or case-control studies) may contribute to heterogeneity among studies. Therefore, a meta-regression test was performed to investigate the impact of the type of study on heterogeneity. The results suggested that the type of study had a significant effect on the assessment of the relationship between anti-T. gondii IgG antibody and abortion. However, this effect was not significant for anti-T. gondii IgM antibody. Based on results of the Egger’s test, there is no significant publication bias in cross-sectional studies. However, the results of Eggert’s test were statistically significant in case-control studies. These findings are likely to be related to the variability of the results of preliminary studies entered the meta-analysis. It is worthy to note that usually language-bias can be a possible reason for publication bias since only English-language articles were used in this study. As the results of the "trim and fill" method showed that the publication bias did not have a significant effect on the study results; so, the results presented in this paper seem to be valid and it is not necessary to use other languages. Furthermore, English abstracts of articles with non- English languages, due to the lack of sufficient information for analysis, were not included in our study. Out of 72 studies, 43 were conducted in Asia, 12 in Africa, 9 in America and 8 in Europe and none in Australia and many European and American countries have no published articles in this field. There are several risk factors for the prevalence of T. gondii in women who had spontaneous abortion, such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, history of contact with cats, raw meat consumption, strain’s virulence of T. gondii, immunological competence of the mother, smoking, and alcohol abuse. However, these risk factors were not specifically investigated in most studies and it was not possible to perform meta-analysis these risk factors. It is important to determine the timing of abortion in relation to the measurement of seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii antibodies; because, occurrence of infection in the first trimester, when hormone levels are low and there is little helper T cell type 2 (Th2) bias, reduces the chance of transmission to the fetus but increases the likelihood of miscarriage. In contrast, the occurrence of infection in the third trimester, when there is a strong Th2 bias, makes abortion unlikely, but increases congenital transmission. The helper T cell type 1 responses caused by T. gondii infection in early pregnancy may induce miscarriage. In contrast, the strong Th2 bias and decreased natural killer cells, macrophages and CD8+ T cells function occur in the late stages of pregnancy that may contribute to parasite survival and increase the chance of congenital transmission [118]. However, due to the lack of evaluation of this risk factor in most studies assessing the relationship between abortion and the seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii antibodies, or incomplete data in some studies, the timing of abortion was not analyzed and this is considered as a major gap. On the other hand, in cross-sectional studies, it is not known when the abortion or the seroconversion happened. Results of IgG calculated in this study (43% and 33%) do not provide sufficient data for the evaluation of CT. This can be due to the fact that IgG appears approximately 2 weeks after IgM, reaches peak levels within 6–8 weeks, and starts to slowly decrease to lower levels after 1 year until the end of infected subject’s life due to the persistence of latent cysts in immune-privileged organs [18, 119, 120]. In the current study, the overall prevalence of anti- T. gondii IgM antibodies in women who had abortion in present pregnancy or a history of abortion was estimated at 1% (95% CI: 1%-2%) and 3% (95% CI: 3%-4%), respectively. IgM antibody is an indicator of recent infection and detection of specific IgM antibody can assist in the determination of acute infection. It is usually detectable 1 week after infection and declines more rapidly, compared to IgG antibody. Level of IgM antibody increases to reach peak levels after 1–3 months. There is a slow decline in antibody levels over the next 9 months until negativation [121, 122]. It was revealed that IgM antibodies can be detected for 12 years following the acute phase of infection [121]. On the other hand, autoimmune antibodies, such as rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibodies, non-specific in vitro binding and acute viral infection, can cause false-positive IgM results up to 60% and results of commercial kits used in reference laboratories. This can be viewed as the limitation of this method since it cannot be determined whether the patient has contracted this infection a few months ago or is in the acute phase of the disease which can put the fetus at risk [123, 124]. Positive IgM test results should be confirmed in reference laboratories using specific tests, such as IgG avidity, or by evaluation of IgA and IgE antibodies [125]. When the IgM serologic reaction is positive in an asymptomatic patient, the IgG avidity test is an auxiliary test to distinguish between acute and chronic infection. Avidity antibodies are low in pregnant women who were infected at least 3–5 months earlier. Low-avidity may persist for 1 year. In these cases, the interpretation of the results needs more precision [125, 126]. It is better to study IgA antibody in pregnant women to continue the evaluation of the acute form of T.gondii infection. IgA production is similar to that of IgM and it appears during the first week, whereas IgA antibody peak occurs later than IgM and persist more than 3 or 4 months following primary infection; therefore, they disappear earlier than IgM [127]. IgA may persist for more than a year [18, 120, 127]. Therefore, it is not also sufficient in the detection of acute infection in adults [128]. On the other hand, specific IgE antibodies are produced rapidly and remain detectable less than 4 months after infection by ELISA in sera of adults with acute infection, neonates infected with congenital infection, and children with chorioretinitis [129]. IgE antibody may be helpful in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathies, and the persistence of IgE can be an indicator of active toxoplasmosis [130]. Although IgE seropositivity occurs for a briefer period than IgM or IgA antibodies and it is useful for the diagnosis of the acute form [131, 132], it does not have enough sensitivity [130]. In pregnant women, confirmation of active toxoplasmosis in reference laboratories can be achieved by the inoculation of body fluids or tissues in mouse or cell culture [18]. Mouse inoculation is absolutely sensitive; however, it requires the use of live animals, housing, euthanasia, autopsy and antibody testing. In addition, it takes a maximum of 6 weeks to obtain a diagnosis and is not widely available method for modem clinical laboratories [133, 134]. Cell culture is a practical method for the detection of T. gondii than mouse inoculation; however, it is relatively slow and may not be sensitive [135]. Unfortunately, in spite of the importance of cell culture and mouse inoculation for the detection of T. gondii, most researchers have not used these techniques in their researches. Moreover, polymerase chain reaction can be performed on amniotic fluid to detect T. gondii-specific DNA after 18 weeks of pregnancy [136].

Limitations

The limitations of the present study include: 1) lack of large cohort of women with T. gondii infection, as compared to controls for the investigation of the association between abortion and T. gondii infection (because cross-sectional and case-control studies due to their nature, do not provide the possibility to explore the causal relationship), 2) the diversity of the diagnostic methods with different sensitivity and specificity, 3) The use of English articles due to lack of fluency in other languages.

Conclusion

Since the pooled ORs for anti-T. gondii IgG and IgM antibodies in different studies among women who had spontaneous abortion were higher than controls, it shows a possible relationship between T. gondii and spontaneous abortion. Hence, emphasize on health education especially on the Toxoplasma transmission routes in the childhood, and performance of screening program using regular serologic tests during pregnancy could help physicians in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of toxoplasmosis and reduction of the economic burden of the disease on society.

PRISMA 2009 checklist.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

NOS checklist.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

The reported seroprevalence of anti- T. gondii IgM antibody in women who had a history of abortion.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

The reported seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma IgM antibody in women who had abortion in present pregnancy.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Funnel plot to detect publication bias in cross-sectional studies showing IgG seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Funnel plot to detect publication bias in case-control studies showing IgG seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Funnel plot to detect publication bias in case-control studies showing IgG seropositivity rates of T. gondii after estimating censored studies.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Sensitivity analysis for assessing the effect of each primary study on the total estimates in cross-sectional studies showing IgG seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Sensitivity analysis for assessing the effect of each primary study on the total estimates in case-control studies showing IgG seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Funnel plot to detect publication bias in cross-sectional studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Funnel plot to detect publication bias in cross-sectional studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii after estimating censored studies.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Funnel plot to detect publication bias in case-control studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Funnel plot to detect publication bias in case-control studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii after estimating censored studies.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Sensitivity analysis for assessing the effect of each primary study on the total estimates in cross-sectional studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Sensitivity analysis for assessing the effect of each primary study on the total estimates in case-control studies showing IgM seropositivity rates of T. gondii.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.
Table 2

Characteristics of the included studies for seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in women who had abortion in present pregnancy.

First authorPublication yearPlace of studyType of studyMethod (s)TestSample size (n)IgG+ n (%)IgM+ n (%)Age (years)
Kimball, 1971 [55]1971USACsDATCFTIgGIgM260109 (41.9)0 (0)--
Sanghi, 1997 [52]1997United KingdomCsLATELISAIgGIgM850 (0)0 (0)--
Hadi, 2011 [56]2011IraqCsMini VIDAS techniqueIgGIgM19011 (5.78)24 (12.63)15–45
Amin, 2012 [49]2012IranCsELISAIgGIgMIgA26499 (37.5)21 (8.0)14–57
Tammam, 2013 [50]2013EgyptCsELISAIgGIgM7635 (46.1)14 (18.4)19–36
Vado-Solis, 2013 [53]2013MexicoCsELISAPCRIgGIgM10032 (32)2 (2)25.3 ± 7.3
Hernández-Cortazar, 2016 [54]2016MexicoCsELISAQ-PCRNested PCRIgGIgM16195 (59)6 (3.72)--
El Aal, 2018 [51]2018EgyptCsELISAQ-PCRLAMPIgGIgM13962 (44.6)--21–34

Cs: cross-sectional, DAT: direct agglutination test, CFT: complement fixation test, LAT: latex agglutination test, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, Q-PCR: quantitative PCR, LAMP: loop-mediated isothermal amplification, IgG: immunoglobulin G, IgM: immunoglobulin M

  105 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

3.  Antibody Prevalence and Risk Factors for Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Women from Multan, Pakistan.

Authors:  M M Nazir; M Akhtar; A Maqbool; A Waheed; M A Sajid; M A Ali; M Oneeb; M A Alam; A N Ahmad; N Nazir; S Fatima; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.702

4.  Association between the risk of congenital toxoplasmosis and the classification of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women and prenatal treatment in Brazil, 1994-2009.

Authors:  Liú Campello Porto; Elisabeth Carmen Duarte
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ehsan Ahmadpour; Ahmad Daryani; Mahdi Sharif; Shahabeddin Sarvi; Mohsen Aarabi; Azadeh Mizani; Mohammad Taghi Rahimi; Azar Shokri
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Uterine toxoplasma infections and repeated abortions.

Authors:  B Stray-Pedersen; A M Lorentzen-Styr
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Emerging role of Chlamydia and Chlamydia-like organisms in adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  David Baud; Lesley Regan; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.915

8.  Miscarriage history and Toxoplasma gondii infection: A cross-sectional study in women in Durango City, Mexico.

Authors:  C Alvarado-Esquivel; S J Pacheco-Vega; J Hernández-Tinoco; M M Centeno-Tinoco; I Beristain-García; L F Sánchez-Anguiano; O Liesenfeld; E Rábago-Sánchez; L O Berumen-Segovia
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2014-05-21

9.  Evaluation of anti-toxoplasma IgG, IgM, and IgA in mothers with spontaneous abortion in Zanjan, Northwest Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Amin; S Mazloomzadeh; A Haniloo; F Mohammadian; Asghar Fazaeli
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 1.341

10.  Toxoplasma Serology Status and Risk of Miscarriage, A Case-Control Study among Women with A History of Spontaneous Abortion.

Authors:  Farnaz Kheirandish; Behrouz Ezatpour; S Hirzad Fallahi; Mohammad Javad Tarahi; Pardis Hosseini; Arian Karimi Rouzbahani; Seyyed Javad Seyyed Tabaei; Soheila Akbari
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-07-14
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Toxoplasma Effectors that Affect Pregnancy Outcome.

Authors:  David Arranz-Solís; Debanjan Mukhopadhyay; Jeroen J P Saeij
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2020-11-21

Review 2.  Vaccines in Congenital Toxoplasmosis: Advances and Perspectives.

Authors:  Mariana Barros; Daniela Teixeira; Manuel Vilanova; Alexandra Correia; Natercia Teixeira; Margarida Borges
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Ezetimibe blocks Toxoplasma gondii-, Neospora caninum- and Besnoitia besnoiti-tachyzoite infectivity and replication in primary bovine endothelial host cells.

Authors:  Camilo Larrazabal; Liliana M R Silva; Carlos Hermosilla; Anja Taubert
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Biyansa Adugna; Zewdu Seyoum Tarekegn; Debasu Damtie; Seleshe Nigatu Woldegebreal; R P Raju; Moges Maru; Abrham Ayele
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Toxoplasma gondii Infection and Threatened Abortion in Women from Northern Peru.

Authors:  Mario J Valladares-Garrido; Virgilio E Failoc-Rojas; C Ichiro-Peralta; David Astudillo-Rueda; Heber Silva-Díaz
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-08-08

6.  In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Tilmicosin and Acetylisovaleryltylosin Tartrate against Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Yazhen Ma; Xinru Cao; Hui Wang; Xingju Song; Dandan Hu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  P-Glycoprotein Inhibitors Differently Affect Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Besnoitia besnoiti Proliferation in Bovine Primary Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Camilo Larrazabal; Liliana M R Silva; Learta Pervizaj-Oruqaj; Susanne Herold; Carlos Hermosilla; Anja Taubert
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-03-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.