Literature DB >> 32168243

Effects of Mydriatics on Rod/Cone- and Melanopsin-driven Pupil Responses.

Sarah C Flanagan, Kathryn J Saunders1, Hope M Queener2, Patrick Richardson1, Lisa A Ostrin2.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Pupillometry protocols evaluating rod/cone- and melanopsin-driven responses often use mydriatics to ensure maximal stimulus exposure; however, retinal effects of mydriatics are not fully understood. We demonstrate that dilation with either atropine or phenylephrine results in similar enhancements of rod/cone- and melanopsin-driven pupil responses.
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to compare the effects of atropine, a muscarinic antagonist, and phenylephrine, an adrenergic agonist, on consensual pupil responses and to assess the repeatability of pupil metrics without mydriasis.
METHODS: Right eye pupil responses of 20 adults aged 21 to 42 years were recorded before and 45 minutes after instillation of 0.5% atropine or 2.5% phenylephrine in the left eye. Stimuli were presented to the left eye and included six alternating 1-second 651-nm "red" and 456-nm "blue" flashes. Metrics included baseline pupil diameter, maximal constriction, 6- and 30-second post-illumination pupil responses, and early (0 to 10 seconds) and late (10 to 30 seconds) areas under the curve.
RESULTS: Dilation of the stimulated eye with either mydriatic significantly increased the 6-second post-illumination pupil response and early and late areas under the curve for blue stimuli, and early area under the curve for red stimuli (P < .05 for all). Melanopsin-driven post-illumination pupil responses, achieved with either phenylephrine or atropine, did not significantly differ from each other (P > .05 for all). Without mydriasis, intersession intraclass correlation coefficients for pupil metrics were 0.63 and 0.50 (6- and 30-second post-illumination pupil responses, respectively) and 0.78 and 0.44 (early and late areas under the curve, respectively) for blue stimuli, with no significant difference between sessions (P > .05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: Dilation with phenylephrine or atropine resulted in similar enhancements of the rod/cone- and melanopsin-driven pupil responses, despite differing mechanisms. Early pupil metrics without mydriasis demonstrated moderate to good intersession repeatability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32168243      PMCID: PMC7080325          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   2.106


  53 in total

1.  Dopamine regulates melanopsin mRNA expression in intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Sakamoto; Cuimei Liu; Manami Kasamatsu; Nikita V Pozdeyev; P Michael Iuvone; Gianluca Tosini
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  The post-illumination pupil response of melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in diabetes.

Authors:  Beatrix Feigl; Andrew J Zele; Samantha M Fader; Annelisa N Howes; Catherine E Hughes; Kris A Jones; Rawlyn Jones
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 3.  Atropine for the Prevention of Myopia Progression in Children: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Raymond T Kraker; Deborah K VanderVeen; Amy K Hutchinson; Jennifer A Galvin; Lorri B Wilson; Scott R Lambert
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Attenuation of short wavelengths alters sleep and the ipRGC pupil response.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Kaleb S Abbott; Hope M Queener
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Pupillary responses driven by ipRGCs and classical photoreceptors are impaired in glaucoma.

Authors:  Carina Kelbsch; Fumiatsu Maeda; Torsten Strasser; Gunnar Blumenstock; Barbara Wilhelm; Helmut Wilhelm; Tobias Peters
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Intrinsic and extrinsic light responses in melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells during mouse development.

Authors:  Tiffany M Schmidt; Kenichiro Taniguchi; Paulo Kofuji
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The influence of intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells on the spectral sensitivity and response dynamics of the human pupillary light reflex.

Authors:  David H McDougal; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Parallel Inhibition of Dopamine Amacrine Cells and Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells in a Non-Image-Forming Visual Circuit of the Mouse Retina.

Authors:  Helen E Vuong; Claudia N Hardi; Steven Barnes; Nicholas C Brecha
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effect of Age and Refractive Error on the Melanopsin Mediated Post-Illumination Pupil Response (PIPR).

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Candice A Pearson; Alexandra M Anderson; Andrew J Zele; Beatrix Feigl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Rhodopsin and Melanopsin Contributions to the Early Redilation Phase of the Post-Illumination Pupil Response (PIPR).

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Beatrix Feigl; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Altered pupillary light responses are associated with the severity of autonomic symptoms in patients with Fabry disease.

Authors:  Gulfidan Bitirgen; Kultigin Turkmen; Nazmi Zengin; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jakaria Mostafa; Jason Porter; Hope M Queener; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.