Jeffrey E Korte1, Rose Kisa2, Caroline J Vrana-Diaz1, Angela M Malek1, Esther Buregyeya2, Joseph K B Matovu2, Joseph Kagaayi3,4, William Musoke5, Harriet Chemusto6, Semei C Mukama6, Anthony Ndyanabo3, Shaban Mugerwa7, Rhoda K Wanyenze2. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 2. Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. 3. Rakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. 5. Clinical Services, Mildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda. 6. Research and Strategic Information, Mildmay Uganda, Kampala, Uganda. 7. AIDS Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Uganda, HIV testing rates are approximately 90% among women in antenatal care, with male rates much lower. The World Health Organization has recommended HIV self-testing (HIVST), and one promising model is for women in antenatal care to deliver HIVST kits to their male partners. We investigated the impact of this model on male partner testing rates. SETTING: Three high-volume antenatal clinics in central Uganda. METHODS: We implemented a cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing standard of care to intervention, with the primary outcome of self-reported male partner HIV testing. Women and male partners were followed at 1 and 3 months. We used unadjusted analyses and log-linear models with an intent-to-treat approach accounting for clustering. RESULTS: Study coordinators randomized 1514 women (777 intervention and 737 control). Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms with mean age (SD) of 25.2 (5.5) years and >44% with secondary education or higher. More male partners tested for HIV in intervention [576/746 (77.2%)] versus control [264/709 (37.2%)], P < 0.01. We identified 34 HIV-positive men in intervention versus 10 in control, with 6/26 (23%) and 4/6 (67%), respectively, reporting linking to care. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate an enormous increase in self-reported partner HIV testing when HIVST is available at home. However, men testing positive through HIVST appeared less likely to link to care than men testing positive at a clinic. These results highlight the potential of HIVST in increasing HIV testing rates, while underscoring the importance of developing effective approaches to maximizing linkage to care among those testing positive through HIVST.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In Uganda, HIV testing rates are approximately 90% among women in antenatal care, with male rates much lower. The World Health Organization has recommended HIV self-testing (HIVST), and one promising model is for women in antenatal care to deliver HIVST kits to their male partners. We investigated the impact of this model on male partner testing rates. SETTING: Three high-volume antenatal clinics in central Uganda. METHODS: We implemented a cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing standard of care to intervention, with the primary outcome of self-reported male partner HIV testing. Women and male partners were followed at 1 and 3 months. We used unadjusted analyses and log-linear models with an intent-to-treat approach accounting for clustering. RESULTS: Study coordinators randomized 1514 women (777 intervention and 737 control). Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms with mean age (SD) of 25.2 (5.5) years and >44% with secondary education or higher. More male partners tested for HIV in intervention [576/746 (77.2%)] versus control [264/709 (37.2%)], P < 0.01. We identified 34 HIV-positive men in intervention versus 10 in control, with 6/26 (23%) and 4/6 (67%), respectively, reporting linking to care. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate an enormous increase in self-reported partner HIV testing when HIVST is available at home. However, men testing positive through HIVST appeared less likely to link to care than men testing positive at a clinic. These results highlight the potential of HIVST in increasing HIV testing rates, while underscoring the importance of developing effective approaches to maximizing linkage to care among those testing positive through HIVST.
Authors: Wilbroad Mutale; Kellie Freeborn; Lauren A Graybill; Mildred M Lusaka; Katie R Mollan; Oliver Mweemba; Margaret Kasaro; Rose Lungu; Andrew Kumwenda; Friday Saidi; Kimberly A Powers; Suzanne Maman; Nora E Rosenberg; Benjamin H Chi Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Rohan D Jeremiah; Dhruvi R Patel; Ellen Chirwa; Esnath Kapito; Xiaohan Mei; Linda L McCreary; Kathleen F Norr; Li Liu; Crystal L Patil Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Joseph K B Matovu; Aminah Nambuusi; Scovia Nakabirye; Rhoda K Wanyenze; David Serwadda Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Joseph Rujumba; Jaco Homsy; Femke Bannink Mbazzi; Zikulah Namukwaya; Alexander Amone; Gordon Rukundo; Elly Katabira; Josaphat Byamugisha; Mary Glenn Fowler; Rachel L King Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.240