Literature DB >> 32168112

Staffing Trends in Magnet and Non-Magnet Hospitals After State Legislation.

Pamela B de Cordova1, Terry Jones, Kathryn A Riman, Jeannette Rogowski, Matthew D McHugh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals differ with respect to quality of care.
PURPOSE: Our study examined registered nurse (RN) staffing over time in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals using unit-level, publicly available data in New Jersey.
METHODS: A secondary analysis of longitudinal RN staffing data was conducted using mandated, publicly reported data of 64 hospitals representing 12 nursing specialties across 8 years (2008-2015). Staffing ratios were trended over time to compare RN staffing changes in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals.
RESULTS: Staffing was comparable in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals for 9 of 12 specialties. On average, from 2008 until 2015, RN staffing slightly increased, with a greater percent increase in Magnet hospitals (6.9%) than in non-Magnet hospitals (4.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Over 8 years in New Jersey, RN staffing improved in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. Although there was a slight increase for Magnet hospitals, there was no meaningful difference in staffing for all 12 specialties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32168112      PMCID: PMC8011811          DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual        ISSN: 1057-3631            Impact factor:   1.728


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of patient outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals.

Authors:  Colleen J Goode; Mary A Blegen; Shin Hye Park; Thomas Vaughn; Joanne Spetz
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.737

2.  The Magnet process: one appraiser's perspective.

Authors:  Amy Steinbinder
Journal:  Nurs Adm Q       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep

3.  Association of Magnet Nursing Status With Hospital Performance on Nationwide Quality Metrics.

Authors:  Matthew R Boylan; Kelly I Suchman; Helen Korolikova; James D Slover; Joseph A Bosco
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.095

4.  Comparison of Nurse Staffing Measurements in Staffing-Outcomes Research.

Authors:  Shin Hye Park; Mary A Blegen; Joanne Spetz; Susan A Chapman; Holly A De Groot
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Is there a business case for magnet hospitals? Estimates of the cost and revenue implications of becoming a magnet.

Authors:  Jayani Jayawardhana; John M Welton; Richard C Lindrooth
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Do staffing levels predict missed nursing care?

Authors:  Beatrice J Kalisch; Dana Tschannen; Kyung Hee Lee
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals.

Authors:  Lesly A Kelly; Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.737

Review 8.  The association of registered nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert L Kane; Tatyana A Shamliyan; Christine Mueller; Sue Duval; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Ratios and nurse staffing: the vexed case of emergency departments.

Authors:  Sarah Wise; Margaret Fry; Christine Duffield; Michael Roche; John Buchanan
Journal:  Australas Emerg Nurs J       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 10.  Do Magnet®-accredited hospitals show improvements in nurse and patient outcomes compared to non-Magnet hospitals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Odessa Petit Dit Dariel; Jean-Phillipe Regnaux
Journal:  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep       Date:  2015-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.