Literature DB >> 32167884

Automatic Spine Ultrasound Segmentation for Scoliosis Visualization and Measurement.

Tamas Ungi, Hastings Greer, Kyle R Sunderland, Victoria Wu, Zachary M C Baum, Christopher Schlenger, Matthew Oetgen, Kevin Cleary, Stephen R Aylward, Gabor Fichtinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Integrate tracked ultrasound and AI methods to provide a safer and more accessible alternative to X-ray for scoliosis measurement. We propose automatic ultrasound segmentation for 3-dimensional spine visualization and scoliosis measurement to address difficulties in using ultrasound for spine imaging.
METHODS: We trained a convolutional neural network for spine segmentation on ultrasound scans using data from eight healthy adult volunteers. We tested the trained network on eight pediatric patients. We evaluated image segmentation and 3-dimensional volume reconstruction for scoliosis measurement.
RESULTS: As expected, fuzzy segmentation metrics reduced when trained networks were translated from healthy volunteers to patients. Recall decreased from 0.72 to 0.64 (8.2% decrease), and precision from 0.31 to 0.27 (3.7% decrease). However, after finding optimal thresholds for prediction maps, binary segmentation metrics performed better on patient data. Recall decreased from 0.98 to 0.97 (1.6% decrease), and precision from 0.10 to 0.06 (4.5% decrease). Segmentation prediction maps were reconstructed to 3-dimensional volumes and scoliosis was measured in all patients. Measurement in these reconstructions took less than 1 minute and had a maximum error of 2.2° compared to X-ray.
CONCLUSION: automatic spine segmentation makes scoliosis measurement both efficient and accurate in tracked ultrasound scans. SIGNIFICANCE: Automatic segmentation may overcome the limitations of tracked ultrasound that so far prevented its use as an alternative of X-ray in scoliosis measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32167884      PMCID: PMC7654705          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2980540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  26 in total

1.  Automatic detection of lumbar anatomy in ultrasound images of human subjects.

Authors:  Denis Tran; Robert N Rohling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Localization of pelvic anatomical coordinate system using US/atlas registration for total hip replacement.

Authors:  Pezhman Foroughi; Danny Song; Gouthami Chintalapani; Russell H Taylor; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

3.  Spinal curvature measurement by tracked ultrasound snapshots.

Authors:  Tamas Ungi; Franklin King; Michael Kempston; Zsuzsanna Keri; Andras Lasso; Parvin Mousavi; John Rudan; Daniel P Borschneck; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Spinal needle navigation by tracked ultrasound snapshots.

Authors:  Tamas Ungi; Purang Abolmaesumi; Rayhan Jalal; Mattea Welch; Irene Ayukawa; Simrin Nagpal; Andras Lasso; Melanie Jaeger; Daniel P Borschneck; Gabor Fichtinger; Parvin Mousavi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Open-source platforms for navigated image-guided interventions.

Authors:  Tamas Ungi; Andras Lasso; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Cancer mortality among women frequently exposed to radiographic examinations for spinal disorders.

Authors:  Cécile M Ronckers; Charles E Land; Jeremy S Miller; Marilyn Stovall; John E Lonstein; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Feasibility of Spinal Anesthesia Placement Using Automated Interpretation of Lumbar Ultrasound Images: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Priyanka Singla; Adam J Dixon; Jessica L Sheeran; David Scalzo; Frank W Mauldin; Mohamed Tiouririne
Journal:  J Anesth Clin Res       Date:  2019-02-25

8.  Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology.

Authors:  Rikiya Yamashita; Mizuho Nishio; Richard Kinh Gian Do; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-06-22

10.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool.

Authors:  Abdel Aziz Taha; Allan Hanbury
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  2 in total

1.  Investigating training-test data splitting strategies for automated segmentation and scoring of COVID-19 lung ultrasound images.

Authors:  Roshan Roshankhah; Yasamin Karbalaeisadegh; Hastings Greer; Federico Mento; Gino Soldati; Andrea Smargiassi; Riccardo Inchingolo; Elena Torri; Tiziano Perrone; Stephen Aylward; Libertario Demi; Marie Muller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Three-dimensional ultrasound for knee osteophyte depiction: a comparative study to computed tomography.

Authors:  Valeria Vendries; Tamas Ungi; Jordan Harry; Manuela Kunz; Jana Podlipská; Les MacKenzie; Gabriel Venne
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.924

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.