Literature DB >> 32167864

Prognostic Value of Tumor Deposits for Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the IDEA France Phase III Trial (PRODIGE-GERCOR).

Jean-François Delattre1, Romain Cohen1,2, Julie Henriques3,4, Antoine Falcoz3,4, Jean-François Emile5,6, Serge Fratte7, Benoist Chibaudel8, Jérôme Dauba9, Olivier Dupuis10, Yves Bécouarn11, Frédéric Bibeau12, Julien Taieb13, Christophe Louvet14, Dewi Vernerey3,4, Thierry André1,2, Magali Svrcek2,15.   

Abstract

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis of all pathologic reports from patients with stage III CC included in the IDEA France phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00958737) investigating the duration of adjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin or capecitabine and oxaliplatin therapy (3 v 6 months) was performed. The primary objective was to determine the prognostic impact of TD on disease-free survival (DFS). The effect of the addition of TD to LNM count on pN restaging was also evaluated. A multivariable analysis was performed to establish the association between TD and DFS.
RESULTS: Of 1,942 patients, 184 (9.5%) had TDs. The pN1a/b and pN1c populations showed similar DFS. TD-positive patients had worse prognosis compared with TD-negative patients, with 3-year DFS rates of 65.6% (95% CI, 58.0% to 72.1%) and 74.7% (95% CI, 72.6% to 76.7%; P = .0079), respectively. On multivariable analysis, TDs were associated with a higher risk of recurrence or death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; P = .0201). Other adverse factors included pT4 and/or pN2 disease (HR, 2.21; P < .001), the 3 months of adjuvant treatment (HR, 1.29; P = .0029), tumor obstruction (HR, 1.28; P = .0233), and male sex (HR, 1.24; P = .0151). Patients restaged as having pN2 disease (n = 35, 2.3%) had similar DFS as patients initially classified as pN2.
CONCLUSION: The presence of TDs is an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients with stage III CC. The addition of TD to LNM may help to better define the duration of adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32167864     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.01960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of tumor deposits for long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae Young Moon; Min Ro Lee; Gi Won Ha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A Six-microRNA Signature Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhikang Chen; Chen Lai; Shihan Xiao; Jianping Guo; Wuming Zhang; Xianqin Hu; Ran Wang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-01-18

3.  Prognostic Nomogram for Rectal Cancer Patients With Tumor Deposits.

Authors:  Xiaohong Zhong; Lei Wang; Lingdong Shao; Xueqing Zhang; Liang Hong; Gang Chen; Junxin Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Predictive and Prognostic Assessment Models for Tumor Deposit in Colorectal Cancer Patients With No Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Jingyu Chen; Zizhen Zhang; Jiaojiao Ni; Jiawei Sun; Wenhao Ren; Yan Shen; Liuhong Shi; Meng Xue
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Tumor Deposits and Perineural Invasion had Comparable Impacts on the Survival of Patients With Non-metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Propensity Score Matching and Competing Risk Analysis.

Authors:  Bin Luo; Xianzhe Chen; Guanfu Cai; Weixian Hu; Yong Li; Junjiang Wang
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  The Prognostic Value of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer With Solitary Tumor Deposit.

Authors:  Qiangkang Lin; Huizhen Zhou; Si Shi; Jixu Lin; Wangxin Yan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Beyond N staging in colorectal cancer: Current approaches and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gianluca Arrichiello; Mario Pirozzi; Bianca Arianna Facchini; Sergio Facchini; Fernando Paragliola; Valeria Nacca; Antonella Nicastro; Maria Anna Canciello; Adele Orlando; Marianna Caterino; Davide Ciardiello; Carminia Maria Della Corte; Morena Fasano; Stefania Napolitano; Teresa Troiani; Fortunato Ciardiello; Giulia Martini; Erika Martinelli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Prognostic impact of tumor deposits on overall survival in colorectal cancer: Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  Wen-Xiao Wu; Da-Kui Zhang; Shao-Xuan Chen; Zhi-Yong Hou; Bai-Long Sun; Li Yao; Jian-Zheng Jie
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-09-15

9.  Combining tumor deposits with the number of lymph node metastases to improve the prognostic accuracy in stage III colon cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CALGB/SWOG 80702 phase III study (Alliance).

Authors:  R Cohen; Q Shi; J Meyers; Z Jin; M Svrcek; C Fuchs; F Couture; P Kuebler; K K Ciombor; J Bendell; A De Jesus-Acosta; P Kumar; D Lewis; B Tan; M M Bertagnolli; P Philip; C Blanke; E M O'Reilly; A Shields; J A Meyerhardt
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 51.769

10.  Prognostic and staging value of tumor deposits in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Tianlei Xu; Zhuo Yu; Qian Zhang; Botao Liu; Yuanxin Li; Feng Wang
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.