Literature DB >> 32167561

Low-level expression of the Type II restriction-modification system confers potent bacteriophage resistance in Escherichia coli.

Karolina Wilkowska1, Iwona Mruk1, Beata Furmanek-Blaszk1, Marian Sektas1.   

Abstract

Restriction-modification systems (R-M) are one of the antiviral defense tools used by bacteria, and those of the Type II family are composed of a restriction endonuclease (REase) and a DNA methyltransferase (MTase). Most entering DNA molecules are usually cleaved by the REase before they can be methylated by MTase, although the observed level of fragmented DNA may vary significantly. Using a model EcoRI R-M system, we report that the balance between DNA methylation and cleavage may be severely affected by transcriptional signals coming from outside the R-M operon. By modulating the activity of the promoter, we obtained a broad range of restriction phenotypes for the EcoRI R-M system that differed by up to 4 orders of magnitude in our biological assays. Surprisingly, we found that high expression levels of the R-M proteins were associated with reduced restriction of invading bacteriophage DNA. Our results suggested that the regulatory balance of cleavage and methylation was highly sensitive to fluctuations in transcriptional signals both up- and downstream of the R-M operon. Our data provided further insights into Type II R-M system maintenance and the potential conflict within the host bacterium.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Kazusa DNA Research Institute.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA restriction; SOS response; promoter; restriction–modification system expression; transcription regulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32167561      PMCID: PMC7315355          DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsaa003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Res        ISSN: 1340-2838            Impact factor:   4.458


  100 in total

1.  Transfer of the genes for the StyLTI restriction-modification system of Salmonella typhimurium to strains lacking modification ability results in death of the recipient cells and degradation of their DNA.

Authors:  O De Backer; C Colson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Contribution of facilitated diffusion and processive catalysis to enzyme efficiency: implications for the EcoRI restriction-modification system.

Authors:  M A Surby; N O Reich
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-02-20       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Restriction-modification gene complexes as selfish gene entities: roles of a regulatory system in their establishment, maintenance, and apoptotic mutual exclusion.

Authors:  Y Nakayama; I Kobayashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multimer resolution systems of ColE1 and ColK: localisation of the crossover site.

Authors:  D Summers; S Yaish; J Archer; D Sherratt
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1985

5.  Regulation and SOS induction of division inhibition in Escherichia coli K12.

Authors:  G R Drapeau; F Gariépy; M Boulé
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1984

6.  Detection of XerC and XerD recombinases in gram-negative bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S Sirois; G Szatmari
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Bacteriophage λ N protein inhibits transcription slippage by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Adam R Parks; Carolyn Court; Lucyna Lubkowska; Ding J Jin; Mikhail Kashlev; Donald L Court
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Natural tuning of restriction endonuclease synthesis by cluster of rare arginine codons.

Authors:  Iwona Mruk; Tadeusz Kaczorowski; Agata Witczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Massively parallel characterization of restriction endonucleases.

Authors:  Nick Kamps-Hughes; Aine Quimby; Zhenyu Zhu; Eric A Johnson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Fidelity Index provides a systematic quantitation of star activity of DNA restriction endonucleases.

Authors:  Hua Wei; Caitlin Therrien; Aine Blanchard; Shengxi Guan; Zhenyu Zhu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regulator-dependent temporal dynamics of a restriction-modification system's gene expression upon entering new host cells: single-cell and population studies.

Authors:  Alessandro Negri; Olesia Werbowy; Ewa Wons; Simon Dersch; Rebecca Hinrichs; Peter L Graumann; Iwona Mruk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Phages against Pathogenic Bacterial Biofilms and Biofilm-Based Infections: A Review.

Authors:  Siyu Liu; Hongyun Lu; Shengliang Zhang; Ying Shi; Qihe Chen
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  MamA essentiality in Mycobacterium smegmatis is explained by the presence of an apparent cognate restriction endonuclease.

Authors:  Samantha E Randall; Maria Carla Martini; Ying Zhou; Samantha R Joubran; Scarlet S Shell
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-09-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.