Literature DB >> 32167269

Risk factors for 90-day reoperation and readmission after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

Haariss Ilyas1,2, Joshua L Golubovsky2, Jingxiao Chen3, Robert D Winkelman2, Thomas E Mroz1,2, Michael P Steinmetz1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for 90-day readmission and reoperation after elective surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective consecutive cohort analysis of patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression with or without fusion for LSS with claudication from January 2014 through December 2015.
RESULTS: Data were collected on 1592 consecutive patients. The mean age at surgery was 67.4 ± 10.1 years and 45% of patients were female. The 90-day reoperation rate was 4.7%, and 69.3% of the reoperations occurred within the first 30 days. The 90-day readmission rate was 7.2%. Multivariable analysis showed that postoperative development of a surgical site infection (SSI; odds ratio [OR] 14.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.86–25.18), acute kidney injury (AKI; OR 6.76, 95% CI 2.39–19.57), and urinary tract infection (UTI; OR 3.96, 95% CI 2.43–6.37), as well as a history of congestive heart failure (CHF; OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.69–5.28), were significant risk factors for readmission within 90 days. Male sex (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38–0.92) was associated with decreased odds for readmission. With regards to reoperation, development of SSI (OR 25.06, 95% CI 13.54–46.51), sepsis (OR 7.63, 95% CI 1.52–40.59), UTI (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.31–4.76), and increased length of stay (LOS; OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17–1.33) were found to be significant risk factors. A subsequent analysis found that morbid obesity (OR 6.99), history of coronary artery disease (OR 2.263), increased duration of surgery (OR 1.004), and LOS (OR 1.07) were significant risk factors for developing an SSI.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study found rates of 4.7% and 7.2% for reoperation and readmission, respectively, within 90 days: 30.7% of the reoperations and 44.7% of the readmissions occurred beyond the first 30 days. A diagnosis of SSI, AKI, UTI, and history of CHF were significant factors for readmission, while male sex was associated with decreased odds for readmission. A diagnosis of SSI, sepsis, UTI, and increased LOS were found to be significant predictors for reoperation. Understanding 90-day complication rates is imperative because there has been increased discussion and healthcare policy extending the global postoperative window to 90 days. Current literature supports a readmission rate of 3%–9% after spine surgery. However, this literature either is limited to a 30-day window or does not stratify between different types of spine surgeries. ABBREVIATIONS: AKI = acute kidney injury; BPH = benign prostate hyperplasia; CAD = coronary artery disease; CHF = congestive heart failure; CI = confidence interval; CMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM = diabetes mellitus; EBL = estimated blood loss; LOS = length of stay; LSS = lumbar spinal stenosis; OR = odds ratio; POUR = postoperative urinary retention; SSI = surgical site infection; UTI = urinary tract infection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  reoperation; readmission; complications; lumbar stenosis; lumbar surgery; outcomes; 90-day; 30-day

Year:  2019        PMID: 32167269     DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.SPINE18878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Akash A Shah; Sai K Devana; Changhee Lee; Amador Bugarin; Elizabeth L Lord; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park; Mihaela van der Schaar; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Morphological parameters of fourth lumbar spinous process palpation: a three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography.

Authors:  Qi Feng; Lei Zhang; Mengyao Zhang; Youliang Wen; Ping Zhang; Yi Wang; Yan Zeng; Junqiu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yijian Zhang; Dongdong Lu; Wei Ji; Fan He; Angela Carley Chen; Huilin Yang; Xuesong Zhu
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Readmissions after elective orthopedic surgery in a comprehensive co-management care system-a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Felix Rohrer; David Haddenbruch; Hubert Noetzli; Brigitta Gahl; Andreas Limacher; Tanja Hermann; Jan Bruegger
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 5.  The influence of comorbidities on the treatment outcome in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amandine Bays; Andrea Stieger; Ulrike Held; Lisa J Hofer; Eva Rasmussen-Barr; Florian Brunner; Johann Steurer; Maria M Wertli
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-06-02

6.  Comparison of PLIF and TLIF in the Treatment of LDH Complicated with Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Xinbo Fang; Mingjie Zhang; Lili Wang; Zhengke Hao
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  A novel hospital capacity versus clinical justification triage score (CCTS) for prioritization of spinal surgeries in the "new normal state" of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Gabriel Liu; Jun-Hao Tan; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Leok Lim Lau; Joseph Thambiah; Naresh Kumar; Jonathan Tan; John Ruiz; Vincent Nga; Sein Lwin; Kejia Teo; Chou Ning; Rohit Vijay Agrawal; Bryan Ng; Weng Hoa Wong; Tseng Tsai Yeo; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.